*EDITOR'S NOTE: All of the opinions represented in this story do not necessarily represent the opinions of All News Pipeline. This story is being published for the express purpose of needed discussion and debate.
As Paris terror attacks rock our fragile world by using the 9/11 false flag play book's script and choreography, a smashing theatrical hit, from bloody carnage to condemnations against terrorists and sympathy for victims, to increased public outrage at refugees, particularly Muslims, roots of the attacks remain deeply covered. Top world scholars concur this black-out serves to create more hatred against a needed enemy, and thus, justification for historical retaliative measures: obscenely profitable nuclear deployment.
Obvious Paris false flag attacks include not only a suicide bomber's passport found at the scene, but two other telltales. Some two weeks before the attacks, CIA director John Brennanmet with France’s security chief Bernard Bajolet, alongside former ranking British and Israeli spooks to discuss cyber and “homeland” security. Friday, same day as the attacks, a French multi-agency 'Security Drill'. Such "security drills" have coincided with real time major attacks, Coalition of the Obvious, an independent American watchdog group formed to warn people about their being possible false flags in their locales.
Which, if any, leaders will end this black-out on today's terror manufacturing business? Consortium News Journalist Robert Parry went as far Saturday as asking whether the Paris attacks Friday will prompt President Obama and other westernleaders to level with the world about real causes of terror, “the underlying reasons for this madness.”
"Will Obama explain how U.S. 'allies' in the Middle East, such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar, have been fueling Sunni extremism for years?” Parry asked. "Will he dare recognize that Israeli repression of the Palestinians is a major contributing factor, too?" Read: Muslims Did 911, Islam Out To Destroy Americans, So Torture Them ‘Nonsense’
To foster Islamophobia and justification for the imperialist “long war,” 28 pages of the congressional 9/11 report have been withheld from the public. Furthermore, not one Muslim was involved in 9/11, yet Bush-Obama regime's Psyop inflicted on an unwitting public collectively works. The George W. Bush administration demanded a fake 911 report, a fact only approximately one-third of Americans recognize, yet one that the American public and its leaders, Republican and Democrats alike, have used to justify carnage against millions of innocent people. Bush regime officials cited "the need to 'safeguard the national security, including protection of Americans from future terrorist attacks,' and demanded the Commission make no further attempts to conduct a deeper probe into the September 11 terror attacks.
Since publishing the 9/11 report, all of its authors, including its lead author, admitted almost everything in it is false. By maintaining that 9/11 false narrative, Americans cannot make informed decisions, behave rationally toward others, resist war, and increase probability of saving their own rights and even their lives. Senior 9-11 Commission Official, John Farmer later stated, "A government that conceals the truth puts the nation at risk." Continued terrorist cover up in the Paris attacks aftermath is putting not only the U.S. but also many other nations at risk. U.S., British and Australian governments publicly provided rapid expressions of support of France embarking on fighting fire with fire, declaring war.
In Sept. 2014 at his Alma Mater, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Noam Chomsky provided a broad primer for individuals keen to learn the truth behind chaos that imperialists have created in the Middle East. During an interview, according to the Levant Report, Chomsky explained the great terror cover up. He asserted that most Americans are not exposed to basic facts or even recent Middle East history because the U.S. government/corporate media alliance seeks to manufacture consent of the people in the direction of whatever current Washington policy goals dictate.
Regarding the powerful cover up of which Obama's complicity is creating terrorists, Parry asks: (edited for brevity)
“Will Obama finally release those 28 pages from the congressional 9/11 report that addressed evidence of Saudi support for the hijackers who attacked New York and Washington in 2001?" Parry asks.
Does Obama have courage to explain the scourge of Sunni terrorism traces back to the late 1970s when President Jimmy Carter started a small-scale covert operation in Afghanistan to destabilize a Moscow-backed secular regime in Kabul and that President Ronald Reagan then vastly expanded the with help of Saudis, pouring $1 billion a year, giving rise to Saudi militant Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda?
Can Obama be convinced that telling hard truths to Americans is not only vital to a democratic Republic in a philosophical way, but also can have a practical impact of creating crucial public support for rational policies?Will Obama realize that propaganda schemes or “strategic communications” might be clever short-term tricks to manipulate Americans, but are ultimately counterproductive and dangerous?
Will Obama finally take on Washington’s official well-entrenched neoconservatives and their “liberal interventionist" junior varsity by challenging their innumerable false narratives?
Will Obama pointedly blame neocons and liberal hawks, including those running editorial pages of The Washington Post and The New York Times, for the disastrous Iraq War?
Will Obama take on the “deep state” dug into big-name think tanks, not just at neocon havens like American Enterprise Institute but also at the center-left Brookings Institution?
Can Obama muster courage to ally himself with American people, arming them with real information, so they can behave like true citizens in a Republic rather than cattle being herded toward the slaughterhouse?
Can Obama shake his own elitism or fear of social ostracism to somehow become a true leader in his last year in office, rather than a timid follower of the prevailing “group think”?
Parry lists actions Obama could take: (edited for brevity)
Pressure his Saudi, Qatari and Turkish “friends” to halt financing and providing military support for Sunni jihadists associated with Al Qaeda and its spin-offs, like the Islamic State and al-Nusra Front.
Work cooperatively with Russian President Vladimir Putin to squeeze concessions from both the Assad regime and U.S.-financed “moderate” opposition so a unity government can begin restoring order in Syria and isolate extremists.
Once enough security is achieved, Syrian people could decide their future and elect their leaders, instead of Obama or Putin deciding and instating.
Then finally release U.S. intelligence analyses on jihadist funding and the lethal sarin attack outside Damascus on Aug. 21, 2013 circumstances, that the Obama administration hastily blamed on Assad’s regime, although evidence pointed to Sunni extremists' provocation. [See Consortiumnews.com’s The Collapsing Syria Sarin Case.]
Admit to Americans the reality about the 2014 Ukraine crisis (used by neocons and liberal hawks to drive a wedge between Obama and Putin [See: What Neocons Want from Ukraine Crisis.]) and thus create space for crucial cooperating with Putin. U.S. intelligence analysts know much about its key turning points, including the Feb. 20, 2014 sniper attacks used to oust elected President Viktor Yanukovych two days later, and the July 17, 2014 shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, used for anti-Putin hysteria. [See MH-17: The Dog Still Not Barking.] "Why has Obama withheld from the American people what U.S. intelligence analysts know about those three incidents?" Parry asks, reminding the reader that Obama's "change" election campaign emphasized a need for transparency.
Toward Nuclear War, WWIIIRecognizing Obama's past seven years' cover up of false flags past and recent, there's little doubt about the direction President Obama will take, as Parry agrees: Go with Official Washington’s flow; worry what editorialists at the Post and Times might think of him; and accommodate neocons and liberal hawks who remain influential inside his own administration.
Not only will Obama continue the terror root cover up, he also will continue persecuting innocent targeted individuals for suggesting his and US allies' complicity. "The American police state is working hard to criminalize all criticism of itself," as Counterpunch tweeted Saturday. Obama's police state targeting innocent individuals and their targeted killings are destined to continue with impunity, bar collective American awakening.
James Stavridis, retired Navy admiral who served as NATO’s top commander in Europe from 2009 to 2013, said NATO should play amilitary role now: “NATO’s actions need to be deliberate, meaningful and at a significant scale,” Stavridis said, adding that consultations among allies should begin soon. (US News and World Report)
In short, Obama will "continue down the road toward destruction," Parry says, continuing the imperialist drama that he and those before him created, placing all Americans and all of humanity at great risk,. Pope Francis names this destruction already begun World War III. Paris has the latest scars, said Pope Francis, from the “piecemeal Third World War."“While one can conceptualize the loss of life and destruction resulting from present-day wars including Iraq and Afghanistan, it is impossible to fully comprehend the devastation which might result from a Third World War, using 'new technologies' and advanced weapons, until it occurs and becomes a reality,” Prof. Michel Chossudovsky says in his book, Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War. Chossudovky is not the only world leading scholar warning about ab imminent World War III driven by nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Noam Chomsky also has warned that the world is cruising toward nuclear war, WWIII.
Qui bono? “Nuclear war has become a multi-billion dollar undertaking, which fills the pockets of US defense contractors,” Chossudovsky answers, adding, “What is at stake is the outright 'privatization of nuclear war'.
“The international community has endorsed nuclear war in the name of world peace. 'Making the world safer' is the justification for launching a military operation which could potentially result in a nuclear holocaust.”