If the Democrat/globalists have their way, the video directly below and the story you are about to read will one day be 'banned content'. So please spread them far and wide if you are a lover of freedom and are ready for a full-scale 'peaceful' revolution against tyranny.
Living within this Orwellian age where 'truth is treason' in the globalists 'empire of lies', it's time for a mass awakening that sends globalist tyranny back to the cesspits of Hades where it belongs. But as we'll explore within this story, should Democrats and globalists have their way, the blatant censorship of Conservatives we're seeing now will be nothing less than how the Democrats are able to steal the 2020 election.
With the websites of Jon Rappoport and Creeping Sharia just the latest websites to be memory-holed from Wordpress, with Rappoport banned for exposing the horrific dangers of vaccines while Creeping Sharia was banned for exposing the creeping of totalitarian Islam into American's lives, how much longer will free thought content like this story and the video below even be available to peruse online? We thank you, ANP readers, for helping us stay in this war! As many ANP readers know, the Poynter Institute for Journalism recently targeted ANP for 'extinction', just as the Washington Post libeled us as 'Russian propaganda' after the 2016 election. The 'book burners' taking ANP offline would be a feather in their caps.
So let's arm up with ideas and information, America, and prepare to take this country back in 2020 from the 'global government coup plotters' who long ago stole America away from the American people. For as Texas Congressman Louie Gohmert recently warned in far fewer words, if these 'scoundrel deep state coup plotters' are NOT held accountable for their crimes of treason against America, our nation and freedom will be forever dead and gone.
As Big League Politics reports in this new story, the video directly below is the trailer for a new movie coming out today called “You Can’t Watch This”. The movie will chronicle the big tech purges of Alex Jones, Laura Loomer, Tommy Robinson, Gavin McInnes, and Paul Joseph Watson with this blunt truth warning taken from the movie's description speaking much louder than mere words: "If the First Amendment isn't for EVERYONE, then it isn't for ANYONE". Think about that, Dems.
The movie, set to be released on May 15, will offer a behind-the-scenes perspective on the recent waves of censorship at the hands of big tech companies that has resulted in prominent conservatives being removed from the public sphere.
Responding to Big League Politics’ request for comment, British filmmaker George Llewellyn-John explains that he hopes to inform the world that social media is a vital part of modern life, and excluding members of the public from it represents a direct threat.
Llewellyn-John made clear that he does not politically align himself with some of the figures in the movie, but finds it important to tell their story because “if the First Amendment isn’t for everyone then it isn’t for anyone.”
In this new story over at the Daily Mail they report upon something that's really very old news to those of us who've been paying attention; google has a left-leaning media bias. As the DM story reports, stories from only 20 different media outlets were featured in google's top stories box in November of 2017, 62% of those from left-leaning media sources, with 10.9% of their links going to CNN, 6.5% to the NY Times, 5.6% to the Washington Post while Fox News only got 3% of their links.
While the mainstream media won't even report upon the massive censorship of Conservatives, it is finally getting a lot of attention in Congress though if nothing is done to fix this major problem before 2020, the damage to America and the credibility of our electoral system will be irreversible. The following excerpt comes to us from this Epoch Times story.
After a seemingly endless stream of conservative personalities being banned from social media platforms, the right-leaning community and even many anti-censorship supporters on the left have increasingly backed the idea that the government, not the private sector, may need to step in after all.
Conservatives have been reluctant to embrace government intervention in big tech’s policing of content, even while largely disagreeing with the policing framework, which includes a heavy focus on stamping out “hate speech,” a hatchling of the ideology of political correctness bemoaned by the majority of Americans, but more vocally on the right.
But with the censorship showing no sign of abating, ideas are beginning to be formulated by representatives on how to counter it.
And the ideas which some are suggesting include having 'big tech' stripped of their government protections.
One of the most commonly debated ideas is stripping social media of their “platform” designation if they continue to enforce rules akin to editorial policy.
Interactive computer service providers are shielded from liability for content created by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.
Some conservatives have argued that social media giants such as Facebook and Twitter have gone so far in restricting, filtering, and sorting users’ content on their platforms that they should be treated as providers of that information, and thus be liable for it.
“Twitter … can’t say on one hand, ‘We’re neutral and thus we shouldn’t have to respond to lawsuits,’ and then, on the other hand, tell me and other outspoken conservatives that our behavior results in suppression on their platform,’” said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) on Fox News on July 27. “They can’t have it both ways.”
Gaetz and at least three other Republican lawmakers had their accounts hidden from search suggestions on Twitter in 2018, until the company restored the functionality under media pressure. Twitter said the issue affected tens of thousands of accounts, but Gaetz questioned why among lawmakers only Republicans seemed to had been affected and filed a complaint against the company with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
As we see in the Infowars created graphic above, 'big tech' has embraced their role as 'modern day book burners' with all of the companies listed having taken it upon themselves to 'police' the speech and content of their users.
With big tech's book burning nothing less than an attempt to steal the 2020 presidential election for the Democrats and fully launch America into the globalists 'new world order' and global tyranny, as we had reported within this ANP story on Monday, from now through Tuesday, November 3rd of 2020, we should expect nothing less than the globalists doing everything within their power to ensure a Democrat victory and a President Trump defeat.
So why does 'big tech' seek to fully control our thoughts and the kinds of news that we're exposed to? In the book "World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech", author Franklin Foer lays out for us how the 'trojan horse of corporate control' is now inside our gates, having replicated itself a billion times over and shape-shifted into tools we use hundreds of times a day without even thinking.
As his book reports, a handful of humans in Silicon Valley, through their decisions, govern the lives of seven billion tech consumers every day. And it goes so far beyond just that. As this 2018 story over at Epoch Times titled "10 Ways Big Tech Can Shift Millions of Votes in the November Elections—Without Anyone Knowing" reported, the explosive growth of a handful of massive platforms on the internet—the largest, by far, being Google and the next largest being Facebook—has changed everything.
Millions of people and organizations are constantly trying to get their content in front of our eyes, but for more than 2.5 billion people around the world—soon to be more than 4 billion—the algorithms of Google and Facebook determine what material will be seen and where it will turn up in various lists.
In randomized, controlled, peer-reviewed research I’ve conducted with thousands of people, I’ve shown repeatedly that when people are undecided, I can shift their opinions on just about any topic just by changing how I filter and order the information I show them. I’ve also shown that when, in multiple searches, I show people more and more information that favors one candidate, I can shift opinions even farther. Even more disturbing, I can do these things in ways that are completely invisible to people and in ways that don’t leave paper trails for authorities to trace.
Worse still, these new forms of influence often rely on ephemeral content—information that is generated on the fly by an algorithm and then disappears forever, which means that it would be difficult, if not impossible, for authorities to reconstruct. If, on Election Day, Mark Zuckerberg decides to broadcast go-out-and-vote reminders mainly to members of one political party, how would we be able to detect such a manipulation? If we can’t detect it, how would we be able to reduce its impact? And how, days or weeks later, would we be able to turn back the clock to see what happened?
With 'big tech' clearly favoring Democrats while censoring Republicans and Conservatives, and proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that 'big tech' can influence the outcome of elections, should the modern day book burners be successful at helping the Democratic party steal the 2020 presidential election, all bets are off about what 'future America' might look like.
ONGOING FUNDRAISER:Despite generous donations, the still dwindling advertising revenue over the course of the last two years has forced us to completely deplete all our savings just to survive and continue to keep All News PipeLine online.
So ANP is accepting reader donations. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card: