The Arlington National Cemetery explains that Gold Star Mother's and Family's Day began during WWI with the wearing of a simple black armband with a gold star upon it. Grace Darling Seibold is credited with reaching out to other mothers who lost their children during the way. In 1928, Grace and 24 other women created American Gold Star Mothers, Inc. The goal of the organization is to honor their children, heal together, support Veterans, and support our nation.
On June 23, 1936, Congress passed SJR 115 (49 STAT 1895) designating the last Sunday in September as Gold Star Mother's Day (now called Gold Star Mother's and Family's Day). On August 12, 1998 Public Law 105-225, 112 STAT 1256 was signed into law designating the last Sunday in September as Gold Star Mother's Day. On September 25, 2009, President Obama signed Proclamation 8422 Gold Star Mother's and Families' Day, 2009 renaming Gold Star Mother's Day to Gold Star Mother's and Families' Day.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim Sunday, September 28, 2025, as Gold Star Mother’s and Family’s Day. I call upon all Government officials to display the flag of the United States over Government buildings, and I encourage the American people to display the flag and hold appropriate ceremonies as an expression of our Nation’s gratitude and respect.
On September 25, 2025, President Trump signed EO Saving TikTok While Protecting National Security explains in Section 1 that Public Law 118-50, Div H 15 USC 9901 138 STAT 959 enacted April 24, 2024 regulates "foreign adversary controlled applications" and specifically cites TikTok as well as other subsidiaries of ByteDance Ltd (a China-based company). Section 2(a) lists President Trump's EOs that delayed the action of this Act while he worked with various companies to purchase TikTok. Section 2(b) states that TikTok has now complied with the Act via a qualified divestiture as outlined in a Framework Agreement with ByteDance owning less than 20% with one board seat. The Act states that it is the President's role to make the determination that all aspects of the Act have been instituted, which has been completed.
Section 3 orders the USAG to wait for 120 days from the date of this EO before enforcing the Act. The USAG shall issue written guidance ensuring proper implementation of the Framework IAW the Act.
Section 4 amends and revokes previously issued Presidential Actions in light of this new Framework.
Finally, in Section 5 President Trump states he reserves his authority to issue further orders with respect to this matter in order to ensure our National Security.
The Accompanying Fact Sheet President Donald J. Trump Saves TikTok While Protecting National Security further explains that this EO will save TikTok for use by the American People while protecting US National Security. The approximately 170,000,000 US users of TikTok will not only continue to enjoy their access to TikTok; but, they will be made safer while doing so.
Of course, nothing is being said about all the tech companies who are banding together to control this platform and collect as much data about US users as they can until complaints start surfacing about misuse of users' data. But, like FaceBook, the companies will simply appear before Congress and say "we're not doing that (anymore)" while they continue to mine & sell the data they've gathered.
On September 25, 2025, President Trump signed the Memorandum [For The Attorney General of the US] Enforcing the Death Penalty Laws in the District of Columbia to Deter and Punish the Most Heinous Crimes begins with citing 18 U.S. Code § 3591 which then cites Public Law 103-322, Title VI § 60002(a), enacted Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1959 which provides for a death penalty for criminals who are convicted on aggravated crimes. This is an essential part of our justice system to punish the most reprehensible crimes against innocent Americans. President Trump signed EO 14164 Restoring The Death Penalty And Protecting Public Safety on January 20, 2025 establishing policy to ensure that capital punishment is respected and faithfully implemented, counteracting the politicians and judges who subvert the law by obstructing and preventing execution of capital sentences. In this EO the President orders the USAG to seek the death penalty for cases involving the murder of a Law Enforcement Officer or a capital crime committed by an illegal alien as well as for all crimes described in the Law. The USAG was also ordered to ensure States have the drugs they need to carry out these executions. The USAG is also directed to file lawsuits seeking to overturn SCOTUS precedents that hinder capital punishment. The USAG is to ensure State AGs and DAs adopt policies and practices aligned with Federal Law.
On September 25, 2025, President Trump signed the Presidential Memoranda Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence addressed to the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, USAG, and Secretary of Homeland Security. Section 1 addresses the violent acts of political violence we have been experiencing in the US. President Trump cites the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk, the 2024 assassination of a senior health care executive, the 2022 attempted assassination of SCOTUS Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the 2 attempts on the President's life during the 2024 Presidential Election cycle, and the riots in LA and Portland which reflect a more than 1,000% increase in attacks on ICE since January 21, 2025, including the recent shooting at an ICE facility in Dallas, Texas which resulted in death and injury.
President Trump states emphatically that these acts of violence are not "organic" in nature, they are sophisticated, organized, and funded campaigns of targeted intimidation. A new law enforcement framework is being put in place that will investigate the organized structures, networks, entities, organizations, funding sources, and predicate actions for these actions, including investigating NGOs. American citizens residing abroad, and those with close ties to foreign actors IAW the Foreign Agents Registration Act (22 USC 611 et seq.)
Section 2 orders the National Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTFs) to coordinate and supervise a comprehensive strategy to investigate, prosecute, and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in acts of political violence and intimidation regardless of plea agreements. Section 2(k) prioritizes crimes such as:
assaulting Federal officers or employees or otherwise engaging in conduct proscribed by 18 U.S.C. 111; conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. 241; conspiracy to commit offense under 18 U.S.C. 371; solicitation to commit a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 373; money laundering under 18 U.S.C. 1956; funding of terrorist acts or otherwise facilitating terrorism under 18 U.S.C. 2339, 2339A, 2339B, 2339C, and 2339D; arson offenses under 18 U.S.C. 844; violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.); and major fraud against the United States under 18 U.S.C. 1031.
Section 3 authorizes the USAG to recommend any group or entity whose members are engaged in activities that meet the definition of "domestic terrorism" IAW 18 USC 2331(5), submitting a list to the President for those groups or entities to be declared Domestic Terrorists.
Section 4 orders Domestic Terrorism be given National Priority Area and to develop grants to provide funding to law enforcement partners to assist in detecting, preventing, and protecting against threats.
The Accompanying Fact Sheet President Donald J. Trump Develops New Strategy to Counter Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence further explains that this Memorandum counters domestic terrorism by establishing a comprehensive strategy to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle all stages of organized political violence and domestic terrorism. The goal is to disrupt organized political violence and put those who participate in it in jail. The Fact Sheet acknowledges that:
Political violence has hurt too many innocent people and taken too many lives, undermining our American values of free speech, citizenship, the rule of law, patriotic and familial devotion, and love of God.
On September 25, 2025, the White House published 2 articles. The first, Strong Spending, Narrowing Trade Gap Drives Trump Economy’s Explosive Growth tells us 2nd quarter GBP was revised UP to 3.8%. The article states that this revision reflects a narrowing trade gap and strong consumer spending. (Again, I say that the prices of items have increased such that it can appear that there is more spending by consumers when the increase in total amount spent is simply a reflection of the increased prices.)
16 SCOTUS stays or motions to vacate of lower court orders
1 SCOTUS affirmation of lower court order
9 suits where judges ruled for the federal government
28 suits where judges ruled against the federal government
In the lawsuit American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. OPM docket # 1:25-cv-10276 filed in District Court D, Massachusetts on February 4, 2025 concerning deferred resignations program, the motion to dismiss was granted on September 24, 2025. The original lawsuit sought the following relief: 1) Declare that the Fork Directive, as currently drafted, is arbitrary, capricious, and not in accordance with law in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act; 2) Vacate the Fork Directive and remand to OPM to provide a reasoned basis as required by the APA for the Directive and extend the purported deadline for the Fork Directive accordingly; 3) Preliminarily and permanently enjoin Defendant Charles Ezell, Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management; Defendant Office of Personnel Management; and their agents and successors from implementing or otherwise giving effect to the February 6, 2024 deadline in the Fork in the Road Directive until such time as Defendants can provide adequate legal justification for the Fork Directive and adequate legal assurance of its terms; 4) Order Defendant Charles Ezell, Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management; Defendant Office of Personnel Management; and their agents and successors to prepare and submit for Court approval a corrective communication to send all government workers who received the Fork in the Road Directive, advising them that the Directive is suspended and the deadline is held in abeyance for a reasonable period of not less than 60 days following OPM’s completion of the required consideration of the Directive’s legal basis, justifications, and funding. 5) Award Plaintiffs their costs, attorneys’ fees, and other disbursements for this action; and 6) Grant any other relief this Court deems appropriate. On September 24, 2025, Judge D J O'Toole notes the defendants moved to dismiss with prejudice due to SCOTUS rulings. Judge O'Toole notes that his court has no jurisdiction over this case. The subsequent Order of Dismissal was filed September 24, 2025 ordering the lawsuit be dismissed.
In the lawsuit Escobar Molina v. Department of Homeland Security docket # 1:25-cv-03417 filed in District Court, District of Columbia on September 25, 2025 in regards to the warrantless immigration arrests was accepted for scheduling. The lawsuit seeks the following relief: 1) Certify a class of all persons who, since August 11, 2025, have been or will be arrested in this District for alleged immigration violations without a warrant and without a pre-arrest, individualized assessment of probable cause that the person is in the United States unlawfully and that the person poses a flight risk (“Warrantless Arrests Class”), and appoint Plaintiffs José Escobar Molina, B.S.R., N.S., and R.S.M. as class representatives; 2) Certify a subclass of all persons who, since August 11, 2025, have been or will be arrested in this District for alleged immigration violations without a warrant and without a prearrest, individualized assessment of probable cause that the person is in the United States unlawfully (“Immigration Status Subclass”) and appoint Plaintiffs José Escobar Molina and B.S.R. as the subclass representatives; 3) Certify a subclass of all persons who, since August 11, 2025, have been or will be arrested in this District for alleged immigration violations without a warrant and without a prearrest, individualized assessment of probable cause that the person poses a flight risk (“Flight Risk Subclass”) and appoint Plaintiffs José Escobar Molina, B.S.R., N.S., R.S.M. as subclass representatives; 4) Appoint the undersigned counsel as class counsel for the Warrantless Arrests Class and the Immigration Status and Flight Risk Subclasses; 5) Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without making a pre-arrest, individualized assessment of probable cause that the person is in the United States unlawfully violates 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(i); 6) Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without making a pre-arrest, individualized assessment of probable cause that the person poses a flight risk violates 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2) (ii); 7) Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without making a pre-arrest, individualized assessment of probable cause that the person poses a flight risk violates 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2) (ii); 8) Vacate and set aside Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without an individualized determination of both an immigration law violation and flight risk, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(i), (ii); 9) With respect to the Warrantless Arrests Class, enjoin Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without an individualized determination of probable cause of both an immigration law violation and flight risk in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(i),(ii); 10) With respect to the Immigration Status Subclass, enjoin Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without an individualized determination of probable cause of an immigration law in violation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(i); 11) With respect to the Flight Risk Subclass, enjoin Defendants’ policy and practice of making warrantless immigration arrests without an individualized determination of probable cause of flight risk in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(ii); 12) Order Defendants, their subordinates, agents, employees, and all others acting in concert with them to expunge all records collected and maintained about Plaintiffs and class members from their unlawful arrests, including any derivative information; 13) Award Plaintiffs their costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and any other applicable source of law; and 14) Award such further relief as the Court deems appropriate. Seems to me they are trying to re-write Immigration Law and procedures using the lower courts instead of taking it to Congress!
Those are some of the exact words used by Google’s censors, aka 'Orwellian content police,' in describing many of our controversial stories. Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
