"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
September 2, 2019
With The Pentagon Unleashing DARPA To Fight 'Fake News & Disinformation', Remember This! According To Many Scientists, 'The Next Great Extinction Event Will Not Be Global Warming, It Will Be Global Cooling'
While this entry at wikipedia reports that the large majority of published 'climate scientists' believe that 'global warming' is caused by man, that entry also published a huge list of scientists who completely disagree with the so-called 'global consensus' on 'global warming' and 'climate change'.
With that group of 'climate change skeptics' including those who have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the 21st century as well as scientists who have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities, it's clear that even amongst the so-called scientific 'experts', there is a huge amount of disagreement upon 'climate change' so how might DARPA handle that in determining what is 'fake news'? Will DARPA just run with the globalist/democrats talking points even if totally false?
Let's first take a look at this DB Daily Updates story before looking below at a totally alternative theory on climate change that would make most leftists heads split. Rather than 'global warming' being the biggest threat that our planet faces as many leftists claim, it's 'global cooling' we should be much more concerned about.
The only positive thing about Hurricane Dorian is that it gives the Climate alarmists something to virtue-signal about other than the Amazon rain forest fires. – Hey, at least Hurricane Dorian is the real deal. Still, Dorian’s a big deal, one that is pounding the Bahamas as I write this, and no one in its path should take it lightly. It’s a real danger to human lives.
Then there are the fires in the Amazon rain forest, which have over the last 30 days been the subject of a major, focused campaign in the media to stoke climate alarm. Unlike Dorian, this is not a real thing, at least in the way the media and our celebrity virtue-signalers have portrayed it. The media has, of course, focused its efforts on trying to blame the entire problem on the government of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro who, like President Donald Trump, is a populist. What a surprise, right?
Yes, the number of fires in the Amazon are up in 2019 as compared to 2018. Yes, they are slightly above the 10-year average. But, as you can see in the chart below, they are way down from most years during the first decade of the 21st century, a time during which Brazil had a socialist government, a time during which no one in the Climate alarmist community or our fake news media attempted to blame Amazon fires on the Brazilian government. Funny how that works.
And while the number of fires in Brazil may be up slightly in 2019 as seen in the chart below in comparison to 2018, even NASA has admitted that the area burned by wildfires all across the planet in 2019 has dropped by 25% according to this new story over at the Washington Times.
As Breitbart reported, according to the Pope, "Human beings have caused a climate emergency that gravely threatens nature and life itself" and while the Pope mentioned nothing of the proof we now have that government's can modify the weather as reported in this August 31st ANP story, the Pope's words echo those we've been hearing from the left over and over again for the past 10+ years despite much scientific objection to the 'global consensus'. Once again, from this story over at DB Daily Updates.:
As is always the case with climate alarmist campaigns designed to frighten the public, the images used in the campaign’s messaging are as fake as many of the messages. When French President Emanuel Macron issued a tweet falsely claiming, “The Amazon rain forest — the lungs which produce 20% of our planet’s oxygen — is on fire,” the photo he used to accompany the false message was of a fire that occurred during the 1990s.
That 20% claim was echoed throughout the climate alarmist virtue-signaling community, with Usual Suspects like Leonardo DiCaprio, soccer star Christian Renaldo and many others echoing it. The New York Times and Washington Post and CNN, MSNBC and all the other major U.S. fake news outlets also repeated the false claim. CNN was of course the worst of all, at one point running a banner with the false claim, “Fires Burning at Record Rate in Amazon Forest.” In another segment, the fake news network’s “climate reporter” hysterically claimed without evidence that, “The current fires are without precedent in the past 20,000 years.”
As reported by Michael Shellenberger in Forbes, that 20% claim is utter nonsense. Shellenberger quotes one of the leading experts on the Amazon rain forest, Dan Nepstad, as saying, “It’s bullshit. There’s no science behind that. The Amazon produces a lot of oxygen but it uses the same amount of oxygen through respiration so it’s a wash.”
But aren’t the Amazon fires still a problem? Sure they are. As Neptstad notes in a more detailed interview with Shellenberger at Environmental Progress, in some years they can produce as much as 3-4% of global carbon emissions. Nepstad also notes that almost all of the Amazon fires are started by humans engaged in deforestation efforts, so it is a problem that can be addressed through proper economic incentives.
But that will never happen so long as we continue to live in this Climate Change fantasy world in which the religious dogma of the left literally prevents any accurate, truthful acknowledgement of real causes. Even worse, the dogma demands that any and all “solutions” must be socialist in nature because the religion of Climate Change is not driven by “climate” at all, but by politics.
The ices of Greenland and Antarctica bear the fingerprints of a monster: a gigantic volcanic eruption in 539 or 540 A.D. that killed tens of thousands and helped trigger one of the worst periods of global cooling in the last 2,000 years. Now, after years of searching, a team of scientists has finally tracked down the source of the eruption.
The team’s work, published in Quaternary Science Reviews, lays out new evidence that ties the natural disaster to Ilopango, a now-dormant volcano in El Salvador. Researchers estimate that in its sixth-century eruption, Ilopango expelled the equivalent of 10.5 cubic miles of dense rock, making it one of the biggest volcanic events on Earth in the last 7,000 years. The blast was more than a hundred times bigger than the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption and several times larger than the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo. It dealt the local Maya settlements a blow that forever altered their trajectory.
The new work helps solve a longtime geologic mystery. Historical accounts that date to 536 describe a dark fog that dimmed the sun and ushered in a wave of crop deaths. Until recently, scholars were open to the idea that these clouds were the remains of an asteroid or comet. But modern data confirms that the event was volcanic—and that it was two volcanoes up to four years apart, not just one.
Ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica show spikes of sulfate, a byproduct of large volcanic eruptions, at 536 and either 539 or 540. The two volcanoes were so large and so violent, they launched sulfur gases and particles miles into the sky. Since this material reflected sunlight away from Earth’s surface, it triggered severe global cooling: One 2016 study found that the volcanoes decreased average global temperatures by as much as 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Crops in northern Europe and elsewhere failed, likely triggering starvation and disease. Though its ties to the volcanoes remain tenuous, the infamous Plague of Justinian—which killed tens of millions of people—started in 541, during the worst of the cooling. (Learn more about human-caused climate change, which will cause more than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit of warming without rapid emission reductions.)
And while the left continues to scream about 'global warming', according to many other scientists, "The Next Great Extinction Event Will Not Be Global Warming – It Will Be Global Cooling". Warning us that far more people upon our planet Earth have died from the cold than the heat, we're also warned the 'next great extinction event' is much more likely to be from an asteroid strike or supervolcano eruption that make temperatures plummet all around the world than from the world 'overheating'.
Forget all those falsehoods about scary global warming, deceptions contrived by wolves to stampede the sheep. The next great extinction event will not be global warming, it will be global cooling. Future extinction events are preponderantly cold: a glacial period, medium-size asteroid strike or supervolcano.
Humanity barely survived the last glacial period that ended only 11,500 years ago, the blink-of–an-eye in geologic time. Cold, not heat, is by far the greater killer of humanity. Today, cool and cold weather kills about 20 times as many people as warm and hot weather. Excess Winter Deaths, defined as more deaths in the four winter months than equivalent non-winter months, total over two million souls per year, in both cold and warm climates. Earth is colder-than-optimum for humanity, and currently-observed moderate global warming increases life spans.
Warning us then that our planet Earth is 11,500 years into its warm interglacial period, they then reported our planet could re-enter into an extended period of cold weather at any time. And with volcanoes all around the planet now going through mass eruptive phases, those pushing the 'global warming' hypothesis may very well be looking at everything completely wrong.
The re-entry into the glacial period will be a major extinction event for humanity, possibly the end of modern civilization. Not only will our land surface be devastated by glaciers, but CO2 concentrations will drop so low that C3 crop photosynthesis, the source of almost all our foods, will be barely sustainable.
One’s predictive track record is probably the best objective measure of scientific competence. The IPCC and its acolytes have been consistently wrong in their predictions of catastrophic global warming. Their climate computer models run too hot, and observed global warming has actually been moderate and beneficial. Global warming alarmists have proven negative scientific credibility – nobody should believe their wild exaggerations.
In the first video at the below, videographer 'Ice Age Farmer' takes a look at 'preparing for the next mini-ice age', a concept that most on the left couldn't even grasp after being fed the 'global warming' narrative for the past decade while the 2nd and final video below from Suspicious Observers is simply titled "Climate Forcing: Our Future Is Cold".
EMERGENCY FUNDRAISER:Despite generous donations, the still dwindling advertising revenue over the course of the last two years has forced us to completely deplete all our savings just to survive and continue to keep All News PipeLine online.
So due to continuous attacks upon us and ongoing censorship, ANP is extending our emergency fundraiser through September. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
