Nancy Pelosi took over as Speaker of the House of Representatives on Thursday, which she falsely claims makes her "equal" to President Trump under the constitution, and the event happened just days after her daughter went on CNN and announced that her mother would "Cut your head off and you won't even know you're bleeding," in response to a question about Pelosi's dealings with President Trump.
An absolutely bizarre statement to make about ones mother to be sure, bringing horrible images to mind of the barbaric Jihadi John, who horrified the world by beheading a number of journalists then distributing the images in a terror campaign back in 2014.
Before moving along to the new radical members of Congress that have just taken their offices, let us address Pelosi's absurd claim about the Speaker being "equal" to the president. According to the constitution the legislative branch equal to the Executive Branch, and Pelosi and Democrats only control one of the chambers of Congress. The constitution refers to the entire Congress, House and Senate, not to any individual member such as the Speaker.
With that said, Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House is third in line to the presidency should both the President and the Vice president be killed, or become incapacitated and unable to serve, which makes one of her first actions highly disturbing.
To pander to one of the two new Muslim women in Congress, Democrat Ilhan Omar, Pelosi and Democrats changed a rule that had been in place since 1837, which banned hats on the floor during session, in order to allow Omar to wear a hijab on her head. Showing the pandering nature of this change in rules, we note that the "hat" ban was left in place, despite Democratic Rep. Fredrica Wilson of Florida, known for wearing cowboy hats, trying to get that rule changed in 2010, when Democrats controlled the House, and was denied.
According to the Daily Mail, Omar was later ceremonially sworn in on the Koran by Nancy Pelosi, while holding Islamic prayer beads.
While changing the rules that have been in place for nearly 200 years may be controversial for some, the other Muslim Congresswomen is an extremely radical Islamic extremist, that has a map in her office suggesting Israel be wiped off the map, and who made the headlines by publicly declaring "We're going to impeach the motherf***er," referring to President Trump.
It is noteworthy that her impeach statement, by her own admission, was a description of a conversation she claims she had with her child.
Tlaib, who is the first Palestinian-American woman in Congress, made the remarks at a Thursday night party hosted by the liberal group MoveOn.com.
Speaking in a dimly-lit room, Tlaib told a cheering crowd that she had told one of her young sons: 'We're going to impeach the motherf***er!'
She made the foul-mouthed remark while recalling a conversation she had with her son after getting elected.
'People love you, and you win,' she told the crowds.
'And when your son looks at you and says: "Mumma look, you won, bullies don't win."
'And I said: "Baby they don't, because we're going to go in there and impeach the motherf***er."'
(Foulmouthed Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib with her two young sons)
What kind of woman, mother of two young sons, actually refers to the President of the United States as a motherf**ker to her underage children, then goes on to proudly admit in public that she speaks that way to her young child?
SWEARING IN USING A KORAN/QURAN
I find it highly "problematic" to use a term liberals love to throw out there on a daily basis, that both Muslim congresswomen chose to be sworn in using a Koran or Quran, because Sharia Law, is an Islamic law that is derived from the teachings of the Koran, and Sharia Law is completely incompatible to the U.S. constitution, which guides America's national government and fundamental laws, and guarantees certain basic rights for its citizens.
There are a number of ways that Sharia Law, derived from the teachings of the Koran, is incompatible with the U.S. constitution, which includes but is not limited to: Sharia does not tolerate freedom of religion; Sharia declares the Koran is the literal word of God and rejects "man-made laws," such as the Constitution and the Bill of Rights; Sharia demands that Muslims fight all non-Muslims until the world is controlled by Islam, which advocates the violent overthrow of the U.S. government, to just name a few.
The concluding two paragraphs from that link, after the article provides detailed verses to prove their assertions, says it all:
In conclusion, it is clear from the writings of several of our earliest presidents, as well as the texts of the nation's founding documents, that American principles are not at odds with - and imperiled by - some "radical" or "extreme" version of Islam. Rather, it is the mainstream doctrine of shariah that constitutes the threat to the U.S. Constitution and the freedoms it enshrines. That incompatibility has several practical implications: For one thing, the shariah legal code cannot be insinuated into America - even through stealthy means or democratic processes - without violating the Constitution's Article VI Supremacy Clause, which requires that the Constitution "shall be the supreme Law of the land."
Even more reprehensible is the willingness of some among America's elites, and it would appear even a subset of its elected leaders, to accede to these groups' increasingly insistent contention that shariah is compatible with the U.S. Constitution. In fact, based on shariah's tenets, its core attributes - especially its intolerance of other faiths and disfavored populations and its bid for supremacy over all other legal or political systems, there can be no confusion on this score: As the Framers fully understood, shariah is an enemy of the United States Constitution. The two are incompatible.
Another thing not compatible with the teachings of the Koran, which the two Muslim congresswomen were sworn in using, is the very oath of office every elected member of Congress must pledge, which is shown below:
“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
In contrast to the presidential oath, where it’s used only by tradition, the phrase “so help me God” has been part of the official oath of office for non-presidential offices since 1862. (Source - History.house.gov)
There is no way to reconcile the Congressional Oath of Office with using the Koran to be sworn in.
THE IMPEACHMENT TALK
Some House Democrats are screaming about impeaching President Trump, including the foul-mouthed Islamic radical Rashida Tlaib, but to date no U.S. President has ever been removed from office by impeachment. Richard Nixon resigned before he could be impeached and Bill Clinton was impeached by the House but was not convicted by two-thirds of the Senate, which is required to remove a sitting president.
House Democrats can voted all day, every day, to impeach President Trump, but the Senate is controlled by the Republicans, and there are not enough RINO's like Mitt Romney to give Democrats the two-third majority that would be required to remove President Trump.
It is all theater for the Democrats at this point to incite and enrage liberal voters.
NANCY 'THE BEHEADER' PELOSI: THIRD IN LINE OF SUCCESSION
With the extraordinarily high amount of threats posted online against President Trump, and to a lesser extent VP Pence, increasing with every new manufactured outrage by the liberal establishment media, leading to some high profile arrests, the most recent in September of 2018, just the thought that Jihadi Nancy "The Beheader" Pelosi being third in line of succession is concerning.
This is a woman previously known to pander to Islamic dictators as she did in 2007 with Bashar Assad, and continues to pander to radical Islamists as her recent rule changes in the House show, along with her daughters bizarre assertion about Pelosi cutting off heads, some might wonder if she isn't a converted, closet radical Islamist herself, as was expressed in an email forwarded to ANP this morning.
The emailer asks: "Well, is this a photo of Lucifer's Nancy Pelosi being sworn in on a Koran, with other Muslims. Are we talking about a Closet Muslim?, A person now in the line to become President? Are we facing Sharia Law Confirmation by Congress? Should women be concerned about possible future genital mutilations?"
For those that think those questions are over-the-top, let me offer a reminder of how in 2012 it was revealed by The Daily Caller that Pelosi "headlined a high-dollar fundraiser in May that was attended by U.S.-based Islamist groups and individuals linked by the U.S. government to the Hamas jihad group and to the Egypt-based Muslim Brotherhood movement."
In 2015, Democrat Rep. André Carson, the second Muslim elected to Congress, was appointed by Pelosi as the first Muslim to serve on the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, despite evidence that Carson had long history of associating with organizations known to be front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood, according to a Center For Security Policy 20-page PDF document.
BOTTOM LINE
While Pelosi might or might not be a "closet Muslim," she has already proven that has no problem jeopardizing U.S. national security by putting people with links to radical Islamic terror groups, in positions of power, definitely indicative of someone with Jihadi sympathies, and Pelosi is third in line of succession to the presidency.
Democrats hold control of the House, with Pelosi as Speaker until 2020, where all 435 members of the House of Representatives will be on the ballot, giving Republicans a chance to take back control of the House.
Until then, pray for the safety and security of President Trump and Vice President Pence, because if anything happens to both of them, Pelosi the Jihadi 'Beheader," would become President until the next election.
A nightmare scenario.
ANP NEEDS YOUR HELP. With digital media revenue spiraling downward, especially hitting those in Independent Media, it has become apparent that traditional advertising simply isn't going to fully cover the costs and expenses for many smaller independent websites.
Any extra readers may be able to spare for donations is greatly appreciated.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
