"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
November 7, 2025
Eli Lilly & Novo Nordisk Agree To Lower Prices And Invest In American Manufacturing, Prices Lower For Thanksgiving, Nominations, Lawsuits, 17th Amendment, And More
I got to wondering what the side effects are for these pharmaceuticals for which President Trump has negotiated lower prices (side effects shown below are from drugs.com) and discovered:
Ozempic: Common side effects: nausea, diarrhea, constipation, fatigue, dizziness, abdominal pain, bloating, burping, heartburn, loss of appetite, blurred vision, and injection site reactions. Serious side effects: hypoglycemia (especially when combined with insulin or sulfonylureas), allergic reactions, gallstones, tachycardia, pancreatitis, and kidney damage.
Wegovy: Common side effects: nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, stomach pain, headache, fatigue, indigestion, dizziness, and burping. Serious side effects: hypoglycemia (especially when combined with insulin or sulfonylureas), allergic reactions, tachycardia, vision changes, pancreatitis, gallstones, and kidney damage.
Zepbound: Common side effects: nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, stomach pain, indigestion, injection site reactions, fatigue, burping, and hair loss. Serious side effects: hypoglycemia (especially when combined with insulin or sulfonylureas), allergic reactions, tachycardia, vision changes, pancreatitis, gallstones, and kidney damage.
Orforglipron: mild to moderate gastrointestinal events such as diarrhea, nausea, constipation, abdominal pain, or vomiting
Mounjaro (Generic name: tirzepatide): Common side effects: nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, decreased appetite, indigestion, constipation, and stomach pain. Serious side effects: hypoglycemia (especially when combined with insulin or sulfonylureas), allergic reactions, tachycardia, vision changes, pancreatitis, gallstones, and kidney damage. Potential to cause thyroid cancer (Thyroid C-Cell Tumors), which may lead to lumps in the throat and difficulty swallowing.
Emgality: Common side effects: pain; redness; itching; irritation where the medicine was injected. Serious side effects: hives; difficulty breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat.
Trulicity: Less common side effects: gaseous stomach pain, indigestion, severe nausea or vomiting stomach pain or fullness, yellow eyes or skin; agitation, change in urination, chest tightness, chills, clay-colored stools, cold sweats, confusion, cool, pale skin, cough, decreased urine output, depression, diarrhea, difficulty with breathing or swallowing, dizziness, dry mouth, fainting, fast heartbeat, fever, headache, hives, itching, skin rash, hoarseness, hostility, increased hunger, irritability, large, hive-like swelling on the face, eyelids, lips, tongue, throat, hands, legs, feet, sex organs, lethargy, lightheadedness, loss of appetite, lump in the neck, muscle twitching, pains in the stomach, side, or abdomen, possibly radiating to the back, rapid weight gain, reddening of the skin, especially around the ears, seizures, severe constipation, shakiness, slurred speech, sunken eyes, swelling of the eyes or inside of the nose, swelling of the face, ankles, or hands, trouble breathing, unpleasant breath odor, unusual tiredness or weakness, vomiting of blood, wrinkled skin, acid or sour stomach, belching, bleeding, blistering, burning, coldness, discoloration of the skin, feeling of pressure, hives, infection, inflammation, itching, lumps, numbness, pain, rash, redness, scarring, soreness, stinging, swelling, tenderness, tingling, ulceration, or warmth at the injection site, decreased appetite, general feeling of discomfort or illness, heartburn, lack or loss of strength, stomach discomfort, upset, or pain. Serious side effects: may cause serious allergic reaction such as chest tightness, cough, difficulty swallowing, dizziness, fast heartbeat, hives, itching, puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips or tongue, skin rash, trouble breathing, unusual tiredness or weakness, or large, hive-like swelling on face, eyelids, lips, tongue, throat, hands, legs, feet, or sex organs; confusion, decreased urination, diarrhea, dizziness, dry mouth, fainting, increase in heart rate, lightheadedness, nausea, vomiting, rapid breathing, sunken eyes, thirst, unusual tiredness or weakness, or wrinkled skin; lower blood sugar, including insulin, metformin, or a sulfonylurea; blurred vision, drowsiness, dry mouth, flushed, dry skin, fruit-like breath odor, increased urination (frequency and amount), ketones in the urine, loss of appetite, stomachache, nausea, or vomiting, tiredness, trouble breathing (rapid and deep), unconsciousness, or unusual thirst; changes to your eyes, such as blurred vision or vision changes; gaseous stomach pain, indigestion, recurrent fever, severe nausea or vomiting, stomach fullness, or yellow eyes or skin
NovoLog: Common side effects: anxiety, behavior change similar to being drunk, bladder pain, bloody or cloudy urine, blurred vision, cold sweats, confusion, depression, difficult, burning, or painful urination, difficulty with thinking, dizziness or lightheadedness, drowsiness, excessive hunger, fast heartbeat, frequent urge to urinate, headache, irritability or abnormal behavior, lower back or side pain, nightmares, restless sleep, seizures, shakiness, slurred speech, tingling in the hands, feet, lips, or tongue. More common side effects: back pain, body aches or pain, chills, cough, diarrhea, ear congestion, fever, loss of voice, muscle aches, sneezing, sore throat, stuffy or runny nose. Less common side effects: depression of the skin at the place of injection, dryness of the mouth, fast or weak pulse, feeling of pressure, itching, redness, soreness, stinging, swelling, or tingling at the place of injection, increased thirst, irregular heartbeat, loss of appetite, mood or mental changes, muscle cramps or pain, nausea, skin rash or itching over the whole body, sweating, thickening of the skin at the place of injection, trouble breathing, unusual tiredness or weakness, vomiting. Rare side effects: bloating or swelling of the face, arms, hands, lower legs, or feet, difficulty in breathing or swallowing, rapid weight gain, redistribution or accumulation of body fat, swelling of the face, throat, or tongue, unusual weight gain or loss.
Tresiba: Common side effects: body aches or pain, diarrhea, dry mouth, ear congestion, fever, headache, loss of voice, runny or stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, stomach pain. Less common side effects: bloating or swelling of the face, arms, hands, lower legs, or feet, rapid weight gain, tingling of the hands or feet, unusual weight gain or loss.
I understand that people want/need their pharmaceuticals; however, they should be concerned with common, less common, serious, and long-term side effects of the drugs they take. In order to MAHA, people need to start exercising, eating healthier, and using natural medicines (such as herbal treatments, acupuncture, acupressure, chiropractic, massage, etc.) to treat their health issues.
On November 6, 2025, the White House published the article Americans Are Paying Less This Thanksgiving 🦃 cites the Wells Fargo Thanksgiving Food Report announcing that Thanksgiving will cost about 3% less than last year, with dinner rolls down 22% and frozen vegetables down 15%. The article goes on to say Thanksgiving meals are 25% less at Walmart, $10 less at Lidl's, $7 less at Aldi's, less than $5 per person at Target, and frozen turkeys at their lowest price in over 15 years at Schnucks.
Personally, I do not shop for food at any of these places. And I have not considered shopping for Thanksgiving dinner yet, so I do not know if the cost will be less than previous years for me. What about you? Are you seeing at least a 3% drop in the cost of Thanksgiving in your area?
So what did the Senate do today? They rejected one bill: SJR90 A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress submitted by Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), co-sponsored by Senators Paul (R-KY) & Schiff (D-CA), read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations on October 16, 2025, and finally voted upon November 6, 2025. This bill seeks to terminate the use of US forces for hostilities within or against Venezuela without the approval of Congress. So the Democrats were trying to stop President Trump from eliminating drugs coming into our country by boat.
The yeas were 49 (45 Democrats, 2 Independents, & 2 Republicans (Murkowski (R-AK) & Paul (R-KY)).
The nays were 51 (51 Republicans).
Everyone in the Senate voted.
The Democrats (and Paul & Murkowski) don't get their wish to allow drug headed to the US to continue sailing on the high seas.
Certify this action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
Issue a temporary restraining order and then preliminarily and permanently enjoin Defendants from interfering with Plaintiffs’ entitlement to timely receive and redeem SNAP benefits as established by the Food and Nutrition Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq.;
Issue a writ of mandamus directing Defendant Vought to apportion the necessary funds to fulfill USDA’s SNAP obligations for November 2025 and all subsequent months in the absence of an appropriation act or continuing resolution, and directing Defendant Rollins to instruct state SNAP agencies to issue such benefits;
Declare that Defendants’ policies and practices of disrupting Plaintiffs’ ability to rely upon the timely receipt of SNAP benefits in the absence of an appropriation act, by de-authorizing retailers, or through other means violates the Food and Nutrition Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2011 et seq., and therefore the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), (C).
Declare that SNAP benefits are an enforceable obligation that must be issued to eligible households without regard for congressional approval of funds;
Award Plaintiffs their litigation costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, as appropriate; and
Grant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Declare unlawful any action by Defendantsto exclude from PSLF eligibility any borrower who works for an employer that meets the statutory criteria for “public service job” as enumerated in 20 U.S.C. § 1087e(m);
Declare that the Secretary lacks the authority to change the statutory criteria for PSLF;
Award Plaintiffs their costs and attorneys’ fees for this action; and
Grant any other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
Declaring that the August 6 Termination of NVAC’s Master Agreement is arbitrary and capricious, in excess of statutory authority, violates the First Amendment’s prohibitions on retaliation, viewpoint discrimination, right to petition, and freedom of association; violates the Fifth Amendment’s right to equal protection, and is null and void;
Enjoining Defendants and all their officers, employees, contractors, and agents from implementing or enforcing the August 6 Termination;
Directing Defendants to issue guidance to all their officers, employees, contractors, and agents to rescind the termination of the Master Agreement and to abide by its terms;
Awarding Plaintiffs reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred;
Providing such further relief as the Court may deem just and appropriate.
In the lawsuit Moreno Gonzalez v. Noem docket # 1:25-cv-13323 filed in District Court ND Illinois on October 30, 2025 about the condition of ICE detention centers, a temporary restraining order was granted on November 5, 2025. The lawsuit sought the following relief:
1. Declare that the suit is maintainable as a class action pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a), (b)(1), and (b)(2); 2. Enter judgment for Plaintiffs and the putative class and against Defendants; 3. Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of denying Plaintiffs and the putative class the right to retain, consult, and communicate confidentially with counsel violates the First Amendment; 4. Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of denying Plaintiffs and the putative class access to counsel violates the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; 5. Declare that the conditions of confinement imposed by Defendants at Broadview violates the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; 6. With respect to Counts One and Two, preliminarily and permanently order Defendants to:
a. Ensure, with respect to the living conditions at Broadview, that
i. the hold rooms at Broadview contain no more than one detainee for each 50 square feet of space, not including the area within 8 feet of any toilet; ii. each detainee held overnight is provided a clean bedding mat and bedding for sleeping; iii. the hold rooms be cleaned thoroughly on an ongoing basis and be furnished with adequate supplies of soap, towels, toilet paper, toothbrushes and toothpaste, and menstrual products; iv. hold rooms have access to sufficient toilets for class members and that class members be able to use toilets outside the view of other detainees, Defendants’ officers, or staff; v. hold rooms have access to sufficient showers for class members and that class members be permitted regular showers outside the view of staff or detainees of a different gender; vi. class members be provided with clean clothing and a private area to change clothing; vii. class members be provided full meals at least three times per day that meet U.S. Recommended Daily Allowances and accommodate class members’ religious or dietary restrictions; viii. class members be provided as much bottled potable water as they need; ix. class members have access to prescribed medications and medical and mental health care, including emergency and non-emergency medical and mental health care;
b. Ensure, with respect to counsel access at Broadview, that
i. class members have the means, capability, and access to make outgoing confidential, unmonitored, unrecorded, free, and temporally unrestricted calls to legal representatives and prospective legal representatives, including allowing for connection to outside interpretation services during the call, within 3 hours of being detained at Broadview, or sooner if transfer is expected within 3 hours of arrival, and at least once during each subsequent 12-hour period while they are detained; ii. class members have the means, capability, and access to schedule a call promptly with legal representatives or prospective legal representatives; iii. class members have access to sufficient telephones to accommodate class members’ legal calls; iv. legal representatives are able to schedule confidential legal calls with detainees at Broadview within 3 hours of a request made during business hours; v. confidential legal visitation is permitted seven days per week, eight hours per day on business days and four hours per day on weekends and holidays; vi. Defendants accurately update the location of detainees held at Broadview in Defendant ICE’s Online Detainee Locator System within 3 hours of their arrival at the facility;
7. Order Defendants to provide written Notice of Rights to detainees, including their rights with respect to living conditions and access to counsel; 8. Order Defendants to provide the Notice of Rights and all other ICE or DHS communications (including any forms, agreements, stipulations, or other documents relating to a class members’ immigration status, proceedings, or removal) to class members in a language they understand, and to provide interpretation or assistance to detainees with limited English proficiency or who are illiterate; 9. With respect to Count Three:
a. Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of coercing, threatening, and otherwise pressuring Plaintiffs and class members to sign immigration documents and/or to waive rights violates the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, the Accardi doctrine, and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(c)(2)(vii); b. Declare that Defendants’ policy and practice of procuring signatures from Plaintiff Moreno Gonzalez and class members on immigration documents in a language that they do not understand, without translation, violates the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause; c. Vacate, set aside, and hold unlawful Defendants’ policy and practice of using coercion and threats to procure detainees’ signatures on immigration documents and/or to waive rights; d. Vacate, set aside, and hold unlawful Defendants’ policy and practice of procuring detainees’ signatures on untranslated documents; e. Enjoin Defendants from using any form of threat, coercion, abuse, or other pressure to obtain Plaintiffs’ signatures on any form or to obtain their agreement to be removed or taken out of the country or to forego any rights, procedures, or benefits under the INA or the Constitution; f. Enjoin Defendants from procuring Plaintiff Moreno Gonzalez’s signature on an untranslated document written in a language he does not read and understand;
10. Enjoin Defendants from retaliating in any form against Plaintiffs, any class member, or any declarants or witnesses in this matter in their immigration proceedings or in any other capacity for asserting rights or otherwise participating in this proceeding; 11. Enjoin Defendants from transferring Plaintiffs outside the judicial district during the pendency of these proceedings; 12. Award counsel for Plaintiffs and the putative class reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in this action under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and on any other basis justified under law; and 13. Grant such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.
1. Defendants shall provide all persons detained at Broadview (“Detainee” or “Detainees”) overnight in any hold room, cell, or other space (collectively referred to as a “Hold Room”) with a clean bedding mat and bedding with sufficient space to sleep; 2. Each Hold Room must be cleaned at least twice each day; 3. Each Hold Room must be furnished with a clock that prominently displays the time and date; 4. Each Detainee shall be furnished with adequate supplies of soap, towels, toilet paper, oral hygiene products (including toothbrushes and toothpaste) and menstrual products for women Detainees; 5. Defendants shall provide showers for each Detainee at least every other day; 6. Defendants shall provide clean toilet facilities; 7. Defendants shall provide each Detainee with at least three full meals per day that meet the U.S. recommended dietary allowances; 8. Defendants shall provide each Detainee with a bottle of potable water with each meal and bottled water upon request free of charge; 9. Defendants shall provide each Detainee with prescribed medication that was within Detainee’s possession when arrested, along with any prescribed medications dropped off by family members or the Detainee’s counsel for the use of the Detainee. Defendants shall also provide any storage requirements for medications; 10. Defendants shall provide telephone services for each Detainee to communicate with the Detainee’s counsel in private and without cost; 11. Defendants shall ensure that all attorney-client communications are carried out in a manner to protect the attorney-client privilege between the Detainee and the Detainee’s counsel; 12. All Detainees must be provided upon arrival or as soon thereafter is possible with a list of pro bono attorneys in English and Spanish, and provide interpreter services as necessary, as set forth in the Byers Declaration [ECF 38]; 13. Upon arrival at Broadview or as soon thereafter is possible, all Detainees shall be listed on the Locator Online Detainee Locator System of ICE that accurately identifies the location of each Detainee; 14. Defendants shall not misrepresent the contents of any papers they provide to Detainees; 15. Any papers defendants provide to Detainees should include an accompanying Spanish translation, and defendants shall allow Detainees reasonable time and opportunity to read and understand the papers. This order shall remain in effect until November 19, 2025. This matter is set for status hearing on November 19, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.
So tap water is not good enough for illegal aliens? And we cater to "individual language needs" of illegal aliens? Supposedly those aliens are here to "be American" and therefore they should speak our language. If they don't they should provide their own interpreter since they have obviously been receiving assistance from someone in order to live here in an English-speaking country for however long they've been here. In other countries, if you commit a crime and don't speak the language, too bad. They prosecute you in the language of the country in which you committed the crime. This judge seems to be under the impression that ONLY SPANISH is spoken by illegal aliens! And that is simply not true.
1. A declaration, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the federal actions described in this complaint restrain Plaintiffs’ ability to assemble, peacefully protest, pray, and gather news, in violation of the First Amendment; 2. A declaration, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the federal actions described in this complaint constitute a federal unlawful policy of using excessive and retaliatory force, in violation of the First and Fourth Amendments; 3. A declaration, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the federal actions described in this complaint present an imminent threat that Plaintiffs will have excessive and retaliatory force used on them, in violation of the First and Fourth Amendments; 4. A declaration, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the federal actions described in this complaint constitute a federal unlawful policy of committing arrests without probable cause, in violation of the Fourth Amendment; 5. A declaration, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201, that the federal actions described in this complaint present an imminent threat that Plaintiffs will be arrested without probable cause, in violation of the Fourth Amendment; 6. An order vacating and setting aside Defendants’ unlawful policies and final agency actions of suppressing disfavored speech, retaliation, interference with free exercise of religion, excessive force, and policing and defending federal property beyond the lawful authority of the federal officials, 5 U.S.C. § 706; and 7. An injunction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 and 5 U.S.C. § 702, permanently enjoining the Defendants from engaging in the unlawful actions described in this complaint, and specifically prohibiting Defendants, their officers, agents, assigns, and all persons acting in concert with them from:
a. Dispersing, arresting, threatening to arrest, threatening or using physical force against any person whom they know or reasonably should know is a Journalist, unless Defendants have probable cause to believe that the individual has committed a crime unrelated to failing to obey a dispersal order. Defendants may ask a Journalist to change location to avoid disrupting law enforcement, as long as the instructions are clear and the press have time to comply and sufficient opportunity to report and observe; b. Issuing a dispersal order requiring any person to leave a public place that they lawfully have a right to be, unless dispersal is justified by a commanding officer’s finding of a serious threat to public safety; c. Using riot control weapons––including but not limited to kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs), Pepper ball or paintball guns, pepper or OC spray, tear gas or other chemical irritants, soft nose rounds, 40 or 37mm launchers, lesslethal shotguns, and flashbang, Stinger, or rubber-ball grenades––on members of the press, protesters, or religious practitioners who are not themselves posing a threat of imminent physical harm to a law enforcement officer or another person; d. Using riot control weapons (including those described above) at identified targets, if doing so could foreseeably result in injury to the press, protesters, or religious practitioners who are not posing a threat of imminent physical harm to a law enforcement officer or another person, unless such force is necessary to stop an immediate and serious threat of physical harm to a person; e. Firing large riot control weapons––including but not limited to tear gas canisters, flashbang, Stinger grenades, or rubber-ball grenades––so as to strike any person, including by deploying these weapons above the head of the crowd, unless the person poses an imminent threat of causing serious bodily injury or death to a person in equivalent circumstances to those where the officer is authorized to use deadly force; f. Firing projectile riot control weapons––including but not limited to KIPs, pepper balls, paintballs, and soft nose rounds––at the head, neck, groin, torso, or other sensitive areas of any person, or striking any person with a vehicle, unless that person poses an immediate threat of serious bodily injury to a law enforcement officer or another person; g. Using force, such as pulling or shoving a person to the ground, tackling, body slamming, or kettling on individual(s) who pose no immediate threat of physical harm to others, unless necessary and proportional to effectuate an apprehension and arrest; h. Using any riot control weapon without giving at least two separate warnings in a manner and at a sound level where it can be heard by the targeted individual(s), unless the threat of physical harm is so serious and imminent that a warning is infeasible. Such warnings shall explain that Defendants may employ riot control weapons, give the targeted individual(s) sufficient time to avoid the use of force, and leave room and opportunity for safe egress. If it appears that the intended audience was unable to hear the warnings, the warning must be repeated prior to the use of riot control weapons; i. Seizing or arresting any non-violent protester who is not resisting a lawful dispersal order, unless there is specific probable cause to believe that the individual has committed a crime for which a custodial arrest is warranted and for which the federal agent has lawful authority to make an arrest;
8. An injunction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2202 and 5 U.S.C. § 702, permanently enjoining the Defendants from engaging in the unlawful actions described in this complaint, and specifically requiring Defendants, their officers, agents, assigns, and all persons acting in concert with them to have visible identification (name and/or badge number) affixed to their uniforms and prominently displayed, including when wearing riot gear; and 9. Any other relief this Court deems proper.
1. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants, their officers, agents, assigns, and all persons acting in concert with them (hereafter referred to as “Federal Agents”), are ENJOINED in this judicial district from:
a. Interactions with Journalists: Dispersing, arresting, threatening to arrest, threatening or using physical force against any person whom they know or reasonably should know is a Journalist, unless Federal Agents have probable cause to believe that the individual has committed a crime unrelated to failing to obey a dispersal order lawfully issued to non-Journalists. Federal Agents may order a Journalist to change location to avoid disrupting law enforcement, as long as the Journalist has an objectively reasonable amount of time to comply and an objectively reasonable opportunity to report and observe; b. Dispersal of Others: Issuing a crowd dispersal order, meaning a lawful command given by an authorized Federal Agent for all persons to leave a designated area, that requires any Class member to leave a public place that they lawfully have a right to be, unless dispersal is justified by exigent circumstances such that immediate action is objectively necessary in order to preserve life or prevent catastrophic outcomes as defined by Department of Homeland Security Use of Force Policy (updated Feb. 6, 2023), Section XII.E; c. Using riot control weapons––including kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs), Compressed Air Launchers (e.g., PLS and FN303), Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) Spray, CS gas, CN gas, or other chemical irritants, 40 mm Munitions Launchers, less-lethal shotguns, Less-Lethal Specialty Impact-Chemical Munitions (LLSI-CM), Controlled Noise and Light Distraction Devices (CNLDDs), Electronic Control Weapons (ECWs)––on any Class member, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop the person from causing an immediate threat of physical harm to another person; d. Using riot control weapons (including those described above) at identified targets if it is reasonably foreseeable that doing so could result in injury to any Class member, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop the person from causing an immediate threat of physical harm to another person; e. Deploying CS or CN gas canisters, OC spray, or other chemical irritants into a group of people or in residential or commercial areas in a manner that poses a reasonably foreseeable risk of injuring any Class member who is not causing an immediate threat of physical harm to another person; f. Deploying CS or CN gas canisters, Controlled Noise and Light Distraction Devices (CNLDD), or Less-Lethal Specialty Impact and Chemical Munitions (LLSI-CM) so as to strike any Class member, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop an immediate threat of the person causing serious bodily injury or death to another person; g. Deploying CS or CN gas canisters, Controlled Noise and Light Distraction Devices (CNLDD), or Less-Lethal Specialty Impact and Chemical Munitions (LLSI-CM) above the head of any Class member, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop an immediate threat of the person causing serious bodily injury or death to another person; h. Firing Compressed Air Launchers (e.g., PLS and FN303), or Munitions Launchers (e.g., 40mm), or KIPs so as to strike the head, neck, groin, spine, or female breast of any Class member, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop an immediate threat of the person causing serious bodily injury or death to another person; i. Striking any Class member with a vehicle, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop an immediate threat of the person causing serious bodily injury or death to another person; j. Using hands-on physical force such as pulling or shoving to the ground, tackling, or body slamming any Class member who is not causing an immediate threat of physical harm to others, unless objectively necessary and proportional to effectuate an apprehension and arrest; k. Using chokeholds, carotid restraints, neck restraints, or any other restraint technique that applies prolonged pressure to the neck that may restrict blood flow or air passage against any Class member, unless such force is objectively necessary to stop an immediate threat of the person causing serious bodily injury or death to another person; l. Using any riot control weapon, including those listed in this Order, against any Class member, without first giving at least two separate warnings at a sound level where the targeted individual(s) can reasonably hear it, unless justified by exigent circumstances when immediate action is necessary in order to preserve life or prevent catastrophic outcomes, as defined by Department of Homeland Security Use of Force Policy (updated Feb. 6, 2023), Section XII.E. Such warnings shall explain that Federal Agents may employ riot control weapons or force, give the targeted individual(s) reasonable time to avoid the use of force, and provide a reasonable opportunity to comply; m. Seizing or arresting any Class member who is not resisting a lawful and authorized crowd dispersal order (as defined in 1.b. above), unless there is specific probable cause to believe that the person has committed a crime for which a custodial arrest is warranted and for which the Federal Agent has lawful authority to make an arrest; and n. Defendants shall not be liable for violating this injunction if any Class member is incidentally exposed to riot control devices after such a device was deployed in a manner that complies with this injunction.
2. To facilitate the Defendants’ identification of Journalists protected under this Order, the following are examples of indicia of being a Journalist: visual identification as a member of the press, such as by displaying a professional press pass, badge, or credentials; wearing distinctive clothing or patches that identify the wearer as a member of the press; or carrying professional gear such as professional photographic or videography equipment. Other indicia of being a Journalist under this Order include that the person is standing off to the side of a protest, not engaging in chanting, sign holding, or shouting slogans, and is instead documenting protest activities, although these are not requirements. These indicia are illustrative, and a person need not exhibit every indicium to be considered a Journalist under this Order. Defendants shall not be liable for incidental violations of this Order if Defendants establish that the affected individual lacked any of the illustrative indicia of a Journalist described in this provision. 3. It is further ORDERED that all Federal Agents, excepting those who do not wear a uniform or other distinguishing clothing or equipment in the regular performance of their official duties or are engaged in undercover operations in the regular performance of their official duties, must have visible identification of a unique, personally assigned, and recognizable alphanumeric identifier sequence affixed to their uniforms and conspicuously displayed in two separate places. The same unique and personally assigned identifier sequence must remain conspicuously displayed in two separate places despite changes to a Federal Agent’s uniform or tactical gear. 4. It is further ORDERED that all Federal Agents, excepting those who do not wear a uniform or other distinguishing clothing or equipment in the regular performance of their official duties or are engaged in undercover operations in the regular performance of their official duties, that are, have been, or will be equipped and trained with body-worn cameras (“BWCs”) shall activate them when engaged in enforcement activity unless expressly exempted by CBP, ICE, or DHS policy.
a. The definitions of “body worn cameras” shall be as defined in DHS Policy Statement 045-07 Section VIII and CBP Directive 4320-020B Section 6.2: Audio/video/digital recording equipment combined into a single unit and typically worn on clothing or otherwise secured to a person, e.g., affixed to the outside of the carrier/tactical vest facing forward. b. For the purposes of this Order, the definition of “enforcement activity” shall be as defined in ICE Directive 19010.3 Section (3.6)(8) and CBP Directive 4320-020B Section 6.4. Such activities include but are not limited to:
i. Protecting Federal Government facilities; ii. Responding to public disturbances; iii. Interacting with members of the public while conducting Title 8 enforcement activities in the field; and iv. When responding to emergencies.
c. Enforcement activities where BWCs are not required to be worn or activated for the purposes of this Order are:
i. Where agents are conducting undercover activity or confidential informants will or may be present; ii. Information-gathering surveillance activities where and when an enforcement activity is not planned; iii. Onboard commercial flights; iv. Controlled deliveries; and v. Custodial interviews conducted inside jails, prisons, detention centers, or DHS owned or leased facilities.
d. This provision requiring BWCs shall not apply to Federal Agents operating at any port of entry into the United States including but not limited to Chicago O’Hare International Airport and Chicago Midway International Airport. e. Federal Agents shall not be liable for violating this provision (i) for failure to record due to equipment failure beyond the control of Federal Agents, or (ii) in the event that cloud storage for storing recordings made by BWCs should become unavailable, through no fault of Federal Agents, either due to (a) the lapse in appropriations, or (b) license or contract expiration.
5. It is further ORDERED that Defendants widely disseminate notice of this Order. Specifically, Defendants are ORDERED to provide copies of this Order, in either electronic or paper form, no later than 10 p.m. Central Time on November 6, 2025, to all those described below:
a. all law enforcement personnel, officers, and agents of the Federal Agents currently or subsequently deployed in the Northern District of Illinois, including but not limited to all personnel operating within this District who are part of Operation Midway Blitz or any equivalent operation by a different name; and b. all employees, officers, and agents of Federal Agents with supervisory or management authority over any law enforcement officers or agents currently or subsequently deployed in the Northern District of Illinois, up the chain of command to and including the Secretary of Homeland Security and other named Defendants.
6. It is further ORDERED that Defendants shall issue guidance to officers and agents to implement this Order. Defendants shall file with this Court such guidance and any directives, policies, or regulations implementing the guidance within 5 business days of issuance of the Order, with a continuing obligation to immediately file with this Court any subsequent changes or revisions to that guidance or implementing directives, policies, or regulations through the period of this Order. 7. It is further ORDERED that in the event that Plaintiffs seek relief for an alleged violation of this Order, Plaintiffs should make good faith attempts to meet and confer with Defendants at least 24 hours before filing a request for relief and Defendants must respond to the motion for relief as ordered by the Court. 8. It is further ORDERED that in the interest of justice, the Court orders Plaintiffs to provide $0 in security, and the Court rules that any other requirements under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are satisfied. 9. The parties shall meet and confer and provide a joint status report within 7 days setting forth proposals for ensuring that Federal Agents present in the Northern District of Illinois while this action is pending remain informed of the limitations imposed by this Order. 10. This Preliminary Injunction Order is entered at 11:48 a.m. Central Time on this 6th day of November 2025 and shall remain in effect pending further proceedings before this Court.
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
Those are some of the exact words used by Google’s censors, aka 'Orwellian content police,' in describing many of our controversial stories. Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
