"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
November 10, 2021
As Media Deliberately Stokes The Fires Of Civil War By Pushing The 'Liberal Narrative' Instead Of The Truth In High Profile, Controversial Trial, It's 'Too Little Too Late' Radical Liberals Discovering The MSM Lied
The media makes it very hard not to consider them the "enemy of the people," with misrepresentations, buried leads, and activism, which quite literally proves they are, collectively, a bunch of liars.
Sound harsh?
Look to the Russian Collusion hoax which the media spend years pushing and turned out to be pure propaganda because it fit the narrative the MSM aka liberal activists wanted the public to believe.
To this day, many still do not know that the Mueller investigation and report clearly stated they found no evidence showing that any American, including members of Donald Trump's campaign, colluded with Russia.
That is just one prime example out of numerous examples over the past five years, where the media didn't care one iota about the truth and only cared about destroying who they perceived as an "enemy."
WHEN A LIBERAL DISCOVERS THE MSM LIED TO THEM
I also find it extremely interesting when hardcore, radical liberals will admit to being "wrong" about very high profile news, but do not place that blame where it belongs, which is on the media that spent more than a year pushing a narrative that has now been shown to be an outright lie.
Kyle Rittenhouse: An armed 17 year old was being chased down and attacked by protesters, when he fired his weapon, killing two and injuring another.
Those are the simple facts, but for more than a year since August 2020, the media has reported, and allowed their "guests" to claim that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist murderer that shot unarmed protesters.
Liberals believed the media, no matter how many images and videos showed Rittenhouse was being chased, attacked and someone fired a gun, all before he fired his first shot.
That narrative led to countless media attacks against Rittenhouse, where no one actually needed a trial to declare Rittenhouse guilty, because they started believing their own lies.
I start with that video because the very first clip, was Ana Kasparian from 'The Young Turks' who was convinced she "knew" what happened and Rittenhouse was a murderer.
Until the actual trial started and a number of facts became apparent, one of which is that the media spent more than a year lying through their teeth, as well a presenting lies of omission, refusing to "report" the entire truth, even as the trial is ongoing.
Looks like Kasparian finally learned that she had not only been lied to by the media, but had herself perpetuated those lies by reporting them without doing her due diligence to verify the information on her own.
With that said, it isn't often you get a mea culpa from a hardcore radical liberal, so credit where it is due, even knowing it she will probably make the same mistake again in the future.
A partial transcript from the video embedded below compliments of The Daily Wire in a piece titled "‘I Was Wrong’: Young Turks’ Kasparian Admits She Bought Into False Rittenhouse Narrative."
“Now, what really mattered to me was how all of this unfolded,” she explained. “What was the thing that sparked it, what started all of it. And, initially, I was under the assumption that Rittenhouse was the person who was chasing after Joseph Rosenbaum — that’s how it started. But I was wrong about that.”
“I was in fact wrong about that, and to show you the evidence to reinforce that I was wrong about that, I want to go to this video.”
She then showed her audience a video of what happened in the actual timelines of events, proving Rittenhouse did, in fact, act in self defense.
Watch:
TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE
The problem here is she is just one liberal and maybe, just maybe, she got through to a number of her viewers, but the damage has been done, as we see threats against the jurors in the trial, claims by the judge in the trial that people were taking pictures at the location the jurors were transported from, and threats of rioting until Rittenhouse is "dead."
(ANP FUNDRAISER: Due to renewed censorship by 'big tech' upon ANP articles, we'll be running a fundraising drive until we catch up on expenses. We also want to thank everybody who has donated to ANP over the years. With donations and ad revenue all that keep ANP online, if you're able, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America's future at this absolutely critical time in US history. During a time of systematic, 'big tech' censorship and widespread institutional corruption, truth-seeking media and alternative views are crucial, and EVERY little bit helps more than you could know!)
The extreme harm the media has done in this case, isn't just to the reputation of Rittenhouse, but to the nation as a whole. Even as the trial produces evidence that makes the prosecutors look like "amateurs," the MSM continues to push their preferred narrative, so if the jury follows the evidence and decides to acquit, the streets will look like warzones once again by those that still believe the liberal establishment media lies.
For example: Part of the testimony, from a prosecution witness on cross examination, is as follows:
Corey Chirafisi: Now, you’d agree your firearm is pointed at Mr. Rittenhouse. Correct?
Gaige Grosskreutz: Yes.
CC: Okay. And once your firearm is pointed at Mr. Rittenhouse, that’s when he fires his gun. Yes?
GG: No.
CC: Sir, look, I don’t want to – does this look like right now your arm is being shot?
GG: That looks like my bicep being vaporized, yes.
CC: Okay. And it’s being vaporized as you’re pointing your gun directly at him. Yes?
GG: Yes.
CC: Okay. So when you were standing 3-5 feet from him with your arms up in the air, he never fired. Right?
GG: Correct.
CC: It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun — now your hands down — pointed at him that he fired. Right?
GG: Correct.
Yes, that was a prosecution witness!
Prosecutor face-palms as defense cross-examines witness
How did the media portray this testimony that even caused the prosecutor to face palm?
Washington Post (Archive.is link here) headlined with "Gaige Grosskreutz says he feared for his life, pointed gun at Kyle Rittenhouse before getting shot."
Florida Post: "Gaige Grosskreutz says he feared for his life before Kyle Rittenhouse shot him during Kenosha unrest."
Insider: "'I was never trying to kill the defendant': The man who survived being shot by Kyle Rittenhouse says he tried to surrender to the teen."
Need I go on? The pattern shows the liberal media, intent on continuing to push their own activist narrative, doesn't even acknowledge that it was Rittenhouse in fear for his life.
Not only has the media created a situation where if their audience doesn't get the verdict they think the jury should have come back, based solely on MSM reporting, threats of riots until Rittenhouse is dead are already being made, but we are also hearing threats of jury intimidation.
A man claiming to be George Floyd's nephew published a video where he claimed people are taking pictures of the jury, joined protests screaming "justice," and attempted to visit the home of the judge.
It doesn't really matter if he is truly the nephew of Floyd, who died in police custody, because it is the threat of jury intimidation that matters here.
Then we see the judge in the trial has "ordered tougher measures to protect the identities of jurors in the case after someone was caught filming them as a bus arrived to take them to the courthouse.."
“It was reported to me...that this morning, at the pickup, there was someone there and was videorecording the jury,” Kenosha County District Court Judge Bruce Schroeder said on Tuesday as the trial entered its seventh day. He added that officers approached the person and required that the video be deleted from his or her smartphone.
ACTIVISM SHOULD NOT DETERMINE CHARGES
As we have seen time and time again, prosecutors in multiple states have allowed themselves to be threatened and brow-beaten into overcharging defendants simply to appease rioters and protesters.
The media hypes them up, lies to them even if it is a lie of omission, which in turns causes them to threaten city officials, judges, defendants and jurors.
Even as the trial proceeds, the media refuses to offer the big picture, instead using headlines and narratives that ignore the actual evidence presented, and the jury, who has the sole job of looking at the evidence and circumstances only, then acquits the defendant and wham.... the rioting begins again.
All because the media originally drafted a narrative, pushed their propaganda for more than a year, and continues to push the same false narrative during the trial.
BOTTOM LINE
The bottom line is simple: The media is deliberately doing everything in their power to stoke the flames of civil war in America, just waiting for everything to blow up, so they can then report it.
If it bleeds, it leads, and if it doesn't bleed, the MSM has no problem wielding a knife and making sure there is blood spilled.
Below we see the testimony that should have ended the trial, where prosecution witness is forced to admit that Rittenhouse only shot him after said witness lowered his gun to point it directly at Rittenhouse.
As an Amazon Associate ANP earns from qualifying purchases
ANP FUNDRAISER: With non-stop censorship and 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
