Match Exact Phrase    

Please Visit Whatfinger News - Conservative Frontpage founded by veterans.





"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"


Share This

  



May 23, 2019


Time Is Short And As The Nooses Tighten Around Their Necks, Deep State Rats Are Scurrying For Cover

- New Findings Detailed Here Show 'Judgement Day' Awaits Deep State Criminals

Investigators-1.jpg

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

What a difference one single report makes. We have gone from seeing the smug, arrogant and pious assertions from senior level former Obama-era intelligence officials predicting the fall of President Trump for "collusion," to weeks later, after Robert Mueller determined after a nearly two year investigation, there was no conspiring or coordination between the Trump campaign in 2016 and Russia, to now finger pointing, preemptively admitting to "mistakes," and brutally turning on each other in an attempt to scurry away from the noose tightening around their necks.

Say what you will about Robert Mueller, and much of the criticisms are justified, but he is a prosecutor that understands that it is never a good idea to jump onto a sinking ship. His report, while still taking backhanded stabs at President Trump, reflected his survival instincts when he stated throughout his report, multiple times, no U.S. citizen, including President Trump and his campaign officials, "conspired" or "coordinated" with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.


THE SINKING SHIP WAS THE ENTIRE RUSSIA COLLUSION HOAX

Once Donald Trump was elected as President, senior level officials from a variety of intelligence agencies understood their actions prior to the 2016 presidential election would come under the microscope, and rushed to create a false narrative, frame and trap Trump campaign officials in an attempt to overthrow a duly elected President.

This is why former FBI official James Comey, after Trump terminated him, leaked information to a friend, admitting the purpose was to have that information leaked to media outlets to "prompt" the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the Trump campaign and possible collusion with Russia to interfere in a U.S. election.


(If you appreciate stories like this, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this battle for the future of America.)



It worked. Every investigation happening right now, from the DOJ Inspector General reviewing the actions of top Obama intelligence officials, to the recently reported appointment of U.S. Attorney John Durham to investigate possible FISA court abuses by those senior officials by providing false information to the court to obtain multiple warrants to surviel Carter Page, as well as other actions senior members of the intelligence agencies took, all stemmed from Comey's bright idea to leak information to prompt the appointment of a special counsel.

Comey basically drove the Titanic (the Russia collusion hoax investigation) right into the iceberg who we will call Inspector General Horowitz

Which may be why now, everyone seem to be turning on Comey.


AS THE NOOSES TIGHTEN THE RATS SCURRY

As Comey points the finger at former CIA director John Brennan, claiming Brennan insisted the unverified and discredited Steele dossier, which was used by Obama intel officials to obtain the FISC warrant on Crater Page, Brennan is now claiming that it was included in the intelligence community  assessment on 2016 Russian interference at Comey's insistence.

Key paragraphs from Fox News:

Sources familiar with the records told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated then-FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA [...]

But in a statement to Fox News, a former CIA official put the blame squarely on Comey.

"Former Director Brennan, along with former [Director of National Intelligence] James Clapper, are the ones who opposed James Comey’s recommendation that the Steele Dossier be included in the intelligence report," the official said.

Related: He Did It, Not Me!

Comey also threw former Attorney General Loretta Lynch under the bus, testifying that she ordered him to refer to the investigation of Hillary Clinton as a "matter" rather than an investigation.




Lynch in congressional testimony recently released by Rep. Doug Collins, claims she never gave that order. The following Q & A can be found on pages 16-17 of the 191 page PDF transcript of the Lynch testimony.

Q And I did want to just kind of keep it basic, but I did want to kind of jump to this while we're on it, because we've been calling this an investigation. I know, I'm sure your familiar with some discussion of whether you ever instructed Director Comey to call the Midyear Exam investigation a matter.

Are you familiar with his -- I think he's testified to this -- that you instructed, I believe in September of 2015, Director

Comey to call the Midyear Exam investigation a matter?

A I heard his testimony on it and that was the first time that he had ever indicated to me, in my understanding -- he may have told others -- that he had that impression of our conversation.

Q So you do not believe you ever instructed him to call it a matter?

A I did not. I have never instructed a witness as to what to say specifically. Never have, never will.

In the meeting that I had with the Director, we were discussing how best to keep Congress informed of progress and discuss requesting resources for the Department overall. We were going to testify separately.

And the concern that both of us had in the meeting that I was having with him in September of 2015 was how to have that discussion without stepping across the Department policy of confirming or denying an investigation, separate policy from testifying.

Obviously, we wanted to testify fully, fulsomely, and provide the information that was needed, but we were not at that point, in September of 2015, ready to confirm that there was an investigation into the email matter -- or deny it. We were sticking with policy, and that was my position on that.

I didn't direct anyone to use specific phraseology. When the Director asked me how to best to handle that, I said: What I have been saying is we have received a referral and we are working on the matter, working on the issue, or we have all the resources we need to handle the matter, handle the issue. So that was the suggestion that I made to him.

Other recently reported tidbits include, but are not limited to;

• Former Director of Intelligence James Clapper denying he leaked the Trump Tower intelligence briefing to the press after they briefed Trump on the existence of the unverified and salacious dossier.

• Former top FBI counsel James Baker, who is under criminal investigation for leaking to the media, is now admitting that the upcoming DOJ Inspector General's investigation is making him "nervous" and that the IG report will likely highlight "mistakes".

• Former FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired after a previous IG report found he had authorized leaks to the media, and has a criminal referral against him because he "lacked candor," AKA lied in testimony about said leaks, claimed he was the one that removed FBI special agent Peter Strzok from the special counsel investigation (Strzok was one of the two FBI employees the IG exposed, via their text messages, to have spoken about an "insurance policy," which was the Russia collusion hoax against Trump)

•  James Comey is striking out at Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, claiming they damaged the FBI's reputation, also saying that Andrew McCabe deserved “severe consequences” for making false statements to Justice Department and FBI investigators." 

Judicial Watch recently released documents obtained via FOIA requests, described as "four pages of documents from the U.S. Department of Justice showing a conversation between former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs Kathleen Kavalec and former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, discussing the targeting of Donald Trump with Steele dossier material."

• In another newly released transcript of a congressional interview, former FBI Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson said "she was normally responsible for signing off on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications before they reached the desk of her superiors for approval. Anderson said the “linear path” those applications typically take was upended in October 2016, with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates signing off on the application before she did. Because of that unusual high-level involvement, she didn’t see the need to “second guess” the FISA application."

• Former Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and James Comey are now striking out at each other.


Related: Spygate Watch: The ‘Purge’ Of Italian Intel, Brennan, And Obama’s Odd Meet-And-Greet

DS000123.jpg


BOTTOM LINE - AMERICANS AWAKEN TO THE CORRUPTION
 

All this is happening as the upcoming DOJ IG report is expected to be released by end of May or early June, which is already being described as "devastating" for many of the deep state members mentioned above, and perhaps even more that have not been named yet.

Even before the report's release, enough information has been revealed by Independent Media, where 64 percent of American voters believe the FBI knew the Steele dossier was unreliable prior to to the FBI using it to obtain the warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.

Sixty-four percent (64%) of voters believe the FBI knew a controversial dossier was unreliable when they used it to obtain a search warrant against President Trump’s 2016 campaign. A ScottRasmussen.com national survey found that skepticism is shared by 86% of Republicans, 64% of Independents, and 47% of Democrats (see crosstab results).

Forty-nine percent (49%) favor having the Department of Justice investigate whether the FBI illegally spied on the Trump campaign. Twenty-nine percent (29%) are opposed and 22% are not sure. Support for an investigation comes from 64% of Republicans, 52% of Independents, and 34% of Democrats.

Just 34% of voters know that the compilation of the dossier was paid for by Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Thirty-five percent (35%) of voters believe the FBI illegally spied on the Trump campaign while 33% say it did not. Thirty-two percent (32%) are not sure. The number who are confident the FBI did not spy illegally has fallen six points in recent weeks.

Now imagine those numbers after the IG report drops, and after president Trump declassifies much of the underlying documentation.





 ONGOING FUNDRAISER: Despite generous donations, the still dwindling advertising revenue over the course of the last two years has forced us to completely deplete all our savings just to survive and continue to keep All News PipeLine online.

So ANP is accepting reader donations.

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.


One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

Or  https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine

Donate monthly from $1 up by becoming an ANP Patron.

PatreonButton1.jpg

Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Stefan Stanford or Susan Duclos can be sent to:

P.O. Box 575
McHenry, MD. 21541

DONATEANP1.jpg












Website design by Innovative Solutions Group - Helena, MT
comments powered by Disqus

Web Design by Innovative Solutions Group