"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
June 20, 2016
As Terrorists Gear Up For 'Summer Of Blood,' US Attorney General Loretta Lynch Puts Americans In Danger Across Country - More Proof Emerges 'Orlando Event' Was Major False Flag To Continue War On Syria And Take Americans Guns
While the Obama administration and Democrats continue to downplay the role of Islam in terrorism, as we learn in the 3rd video below and this story from Sputnik News, 'global jihadism' is linked to more than half of all war deaths across the planet in 2016. Is there a reason that we should trust ANYTHING our government is saying either on Orlando or what's happening in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East, halfway around the world? From Paul Craig Roberts:
My cautionary statement was that we should not believe massive terrorist attacks without evidence, especially when we know for an absolute fact that the government lied to us about Saddam Hussein, Assad, and Libya. These lies have kept us at work destroying Muslim countries for 15 years, with a consequence that Europe is being overrun with refugees from our wars based on nothing but the government’s lies.
It is not an unreasonable conclusion that a government that will lie to us about Iraq, Libya, Syria, the economic condition of the country and that will lie to the 9/11 Commission might also lie to us about Boston, Sandy Hook, San Bernandino, and Orlando.
My point is simply that we are given stories based not on visible evidence but on claims. These kind of events have to leave massive evidence, but somehow it is not visible.
To recap, we are trying to see if we can find real evidence that supports the official story. We are not trying to disprove the official story but to prove it.
If we cannot prove the story, we are entitled to disbelieve it.
Despite the absolute fact that events like this can be pulled off using crisis actors and be used by TPTB to further their own agendas, the dangers that Islamic terrorism does pose to Americans should not be underestimated nor completely denied and hidden away as AG Lynch and Barack Obama are seemingly doing now by both refusing to use the words 'Islamic terrorism' together as well as redacting the 911 calls. Were they also redacting something else within those calls that could have possibly given this 'event' away as an obvious 'false flag'?
'Dumbing down' Americans to the scourge of Islam and the absolute and undeniable fact that global jihad is now underway thus puts ALL Americans in danger. Why would Obama and Lynch decide to release these calls with all hints to 'Islamic terrorism' removed? We're happy to report that many Americans aren't falling for it as the #ShootBack campaign has gone viral and weapons are flying off of the shelves as Americans prepare to defend themselves against such terror as never before.
However, we always need to keep in mind that, despite the fact that Islamic terrorism is REAL, so is government sponsored false flag terrorism that goes back many, many years to the Kennedy administration in the 1960's at least. For those who haven't yet heard of 'Operation Northwoods', here is a description from Wikipedia about the kinds of games that government is allowed to play with our heads including 'perceived acts of terrorism'.:
At the time of the proposal, communists led by Fidel Castro had recently taken power in Cuba. The operation proposed creating public support for a war against Cuba by blaming it for terrorist acts that would actually be perpetrated by the US Government. To this end, Operation Northwoods proposals recommended hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:
The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.
Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various US military and civilian targets. The operation recommended developing a "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington".
The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the US government's anti-communist Cuban Project, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authorized by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy. According to currently released documentation, none of the operations became active under the auspices of the Operation Northwoods proposals.
As we see here, the proposals were rejected by President Kennedy. Is that why he was assassinated? Why is government allowed to outright lie to the American people, THEIR employers? It's clear that government has forgotten that they are merely 'servants' to the American people. As long as govt is permitted to get away with such 'events' as Orlando, Sandy Hook and other 'events' where NO REAL PROOF has ever come forward that such events ever happened, government will continue to be the boot that stomps upon a human face...forever.
However, despite the obvious contradictions, it's extremely important to remember that even though government may be responsible for carrying out terror or 'perceived acts of terror' against the American people, Americans are not immune to the very real terror being inflicted by those who support ISIS and the Islamic State. At ANP, we also strongly believe that the large majority of public servants within government have not been compromised and would never take part in such activities. However, it only takes a few rotten apples.
How can we tell the difference between 'real acts of terror' and 'perceived acts of terror'? (How about videos and pictures of an 'event' in progress?) That's the million dollar question and while it can't be easily answered with a government that attempts to tightly control everything within media, Americans are best served by preparing to defend ourselves against such radicals as ISIS while digging deeply into each and every 'event' that occurs in a search for truth that, unfortunately, we may never find.
However, knowing the closeness that the current administration in Washington DC has with ISIS terrorists leads us to ask, have we reached the point in time where ISIS terror has become inseparable from government sponsored terror upon the American people? If so, how do the American people put these monsters back in their cages, where they belong?