Another Feminist Tweet has gone viral as they areoutraged over a statue at the University of the Incarnate Word in San Antonio titled "Classmates," which depicts two college students casually chatting, with the female sitting relaxing on a bench with a book in her lap while the male student stands with one foot on the bench, arms leaning on his leg.
Seventy-nine-year-old Paul Tadlock, the poor artist who sculpted the photo, has since taken time out of his already-dwindling lifespan to "artsplain" to these psychotic feminists he intended the sculpture to depict exactly what it represented: two college kids enjoying a conversation. Tadlock even modeled the girl after his own daughter.
"It was two students visiting, talking … implying nothing beyond that," said Tadlock. "That [sculpture] was [done] in the early 1990s when my daughter was a student at the University of the Incarnate Word. In fact, that's her. I sculpted her."
So, what are the Feminists of America so outraged about? 'Mansplaining'...... and if you don't know what that means, join the club, I didn't either and much to my surprise there is actually a definition provided at Wikipedia for it!
Mansplaining is a portmanteau of the words man and explaining, defined as "to explain something to someone, typically a man to woman, in a manner regarded as condescending or patronizing."
Evidently, in the minds of "Feminists" this statue has a hidden meaning, described by Bustle as "The implied dynamics between these two figures are pretty clear, and pretty reinforcing of conventional, outdated, sexist gender role stereotypes: The woman, small and cross legged, is lorded over by the man who, spread-legged, is quite literally thrusting his manhood, along with all his important opinions, in her face."
WHERE IS THE FEMINIST OUTRAGE OVER THIS?
Readers can find plenty of "outrage" accross the Internet since late May over this issue, just search for "statue" and "mansplaining," because what I want to know is why the same so-called feminists that are so utterly disgusted by an innocent statue, haven't said one word, not a peep, about Islamic extremists, members of ISIS, selling female slaves on Facebook for $8,000.
A recent Facebook posting attributed to an Islamic State fighter who calls himself Abu Assad Almani shows a young woman, around 18, with olive skin and dark bangs that droop onto her face. In the Facebook photo, she attempts to smile but doesn’t look at her photographer. The caption mentions a single biographical fact: She is for sale.
"To all the bros thinking about buying a slave, this one is $8,000,” begins the May 20 Facebook posting by Almani. The same man posted a second image a few hours later, this one a pale young face with weepy red eyes. "Another sabiyah [slave], also about $8,000,” the posting reads. "Yay, or nay?"
Where is the continued outrage from those that advocate for "safe spaces" on American college campuses, over the continued sexual slavery of the Yazidi women and children taken captive in August 2014, which one survivor describes as "Thousands of girls were taken and they were being sold, they were being exchanged, they were being [used] as gifts given to the [ISIS] members who were over the age of 35.” Some of the girls were 9 years old or even younger, she said. They have no safe spaces.
The incident occurred on January 13 in Lahore. The three girls—aged 17, 18, and 20—were walking home after a hard day's work. Four Muslim youths in a vehicle followed the girls and accosted them. The men "misbehaved," yelled "suggestive and lewd comments," and harassed the girls to get in their car for "a ride and some fun."
The girls declined the "invitation," and added that they were "devout Christians and did not practice sex outside of marriage."
This caused an immediate change in the demeanour of the boys who became more aggressive and started to threaten the girls to enter the car or to be physically forced in. Terrified of the increasingly dangerous situation they were in the girls started to run in a fit of panic. This only enraged the young Muslim men further, one of them shouted out at the girls, he said: "How dare you run away from us, Christian girls are only meant for one thing, the pleasure of Muslim men."
NAMING WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME IS NOW 'HATE SPEECH'
While we are on the topic of where the outrage is, why are the same people so outraged over an innocent statue, but have absolutely no criticism for Mark Zuckerburg colluding with Angela Merkel on censoring any mention of Muslim abuse, sexual assauly and rape of women and children, by labeling it all "xenophobia."
Now we see that YouTube, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter and others have made an agreement with the European Union to "crack down" on so-called "hate speech," described as speech "directed against anyone over issues of race, color, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin.," under the guise of going after terror organizations using social media to spread their message.
What that actually means is "truth" about who is committing the crimes shown above, is now considered "hate speech," and will be censored.
'HONOR KILLINGS ALREADY HAPPENING IN AMERICA
While most of these "outraged" feminists are moaning about a statue a man created in tribute to his daughter, they are also not outraged, an in fact encourage Barack Obama's continued importing of Mulim migrants into America, despite the fact that 23-27 "honor killings" occur already in the United States each year from Muslim migrants that do not integrate into our society once they are resettled.
Honor Killing - An honor killing or shame killing is the homicide of a member of a family by other members, due to the perpetrators' belief that the victim has brought shame or dishonor upon the family, or has violated the principles of a community or a religion, usually for reasons such as refusing to enter an arranged marriage, being in a relationship that is disapproved by their family, having sex outside marriage, becoming the victim of rape, dressing in ways which are deemed inappropriate, engaging in non-heterosexual relations or renouncing a faith. (Source)
“Honor Violence Measurement Methods,” a study released earlier this year by research corporation Westat, and commissioned by the U.S. Department of Justice, identified four types of honor violence: forced marriage, honor-based domestic violence, honor killing and female genital mutilation. The report, which estimated that 23-27 honor killings per year occur in the U.S., noted that 91 percent of victims in North America are murdered for being “too Westernized,” and in incidents involving daughters 18 years or younger, a father is almost always involved. And for every honor killing, there are many more instances of physical and emotional abuse, all in the name of fundamentalist Islam, say experts.
“Typically seen in the form of physical or emotional abuse, rape or kidnapping, honor violence also includes harmful practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM) and forced marriage. In extreme cases, murder,” said Stephanie Baric, executive director of the AHA Foundation, a non-profit organization founded by women’s rights activist and FGM survivor Ayaan Hirsi Ali. “In sharp contrast with domestic violence, families and communities often condone honor violence, which makes it more difficult to identify and stop.”
While women are generally the victims of honor violence, men also may be targeted if they reject an arranged marriage or are assumed to be homosexual. Victims may also be pressured to commit suicide, and may do so without even realizing they are victims of honor-motivated violence, said Baric.
Jihad Watch reports that "Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. A manual of Islamic law certified as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy by Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, says that “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.” However, “not subject to retaliation” is “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s offspring.” (‘Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2). In other words, someone who kills his child incurs no legal penalty under Islamic law. In this case, of course, the victim was the murderer’s wife, a victim to the culture of violence and intimidation that such laws help create."
Feminists and "social justice" warriors in America truly need to get their priorities straight, they help fight for gay rights, yet encourage importing people into America that believe they are justifed in killing gays. They fight for women's equality, yet their silence is defeaning as women in Middle Eastern countries are forced into becoming sex slaves. They fight against "sexual harassment" here in America but stay silent on the literal "rape" of Europe by migrants, that is happening now to women and children.
As was said to me this morning via an email exchange, women across the world are "buried alive, beheaded, drowned, burned alive, stoned to death, raped, hung, tortured, sold into sexual slavery, disembowled and blown up" and not a whimper from the feminists in America.
Their defeaning silence about the atrocities being committed worldwide, and right here in America, should be the "outrage of the century!" With their silence, they are offering a "silent" approval.