Long known as the 'Gray Lady' of the news industry, the Times published this story last Sunday titled "Your 5G Phone Won’t Hurt You. But Russia Wants You to Think Otherwise" within which they attempted to blame Americans concerns over the proven ill health effects of 5G and Wi-Fi radiation on Russia due to a recent story on 5G over at Russia Today.
Reporting as their subtitle "RT America, a network known for sowing disinformation, has a new alarm: the coming '5G Apocalypse'", the NY Times story then sounded exactly like an advertisement for 'big tech' and the cell phone industry, ignoring the very real proven cases of wireless radiation causing cancer, infertility, tumors, heart problems and even autism as has been reported by even Western medical doctors and scientists as heard in the videos at the bottom of this story.
And we're not the least bit surprised that the NY Times allowed globalist propaganda spewing website 'New Knowledge' to claim that warnings of negative health effects from 5G and Wi-Fi is 'economic warfare' being waged by Russia against America.
Yet as Susan Duclos had reported back on December 20th of 2018, New Knowledge's own CEO Jonathon Morgan was banned from facebook for running a false flag operation on facebook attempting to alter the results of the 2017 Alabama special election. Why does the NY Times use such biased and totally discredited sources? Interestingly, US Congress also used one of New Knowledge's reports on Russia meddling in the 2016 US election and we all know how that's turned out. The entire scam was collusion between Democrats, big tech and big media, a very real coup attempt to take down President Trump. Treason? Only treason trials for the corrupted deep state, colluding media and big tech brings back the 'rule of law' to America.
If the Times had simply given us a fact-based story about how doctors and scientists have known for years of the dangers of wireless radiation and its effects upon the human bodies rather than immediately shifting to the 'blame Russia' angle that we've been hearing over and over and over again from the msm for the past 2+ years. Don't these people learn anything when such a tired old excuse as 'blame Russia' continues to blow up in their own faces?
So we'll take a look within the remainder of this story at the proven negative health effects of 5G networks while looking at the photographs within this story, artists conceptions of what our world might look like if we could see wireless radiation. And in the 2nd video at the bottom of this story, our videographer let's us hear what 5G would sound like.
Jacob Cavalier - 5g has no place in this lifetime....it is harmful to everything on planet earth........I am a Republican and I completely disagree 100% with these people.........
Another excellent comment from that video.:
Jeanie Delgado - 5 G is a killer! US citizens do not want it!!! period! China is sterilizing their citizens with 5 G! Let them! There would be no security just more corruption from them and the corrupt people trying to bring down this current administration! Why didn't Feinstein ask about the destruction of human, animal and plant life from 5 G or is it all about $$$$$$$!
And since the 'Gray Lady' NY Times is going after RT for correctly reporting upon the negative health effects of 5G and wireless radiation, claiming it's 'Russia' sowing 'economic warfare', they clearly haven't been paying attention to ANP where we've been reporting upon 5G's dangers going back several years.
Research has been done on the effects of cell radiation but it has been inconsistent. According to the National Cancer Institute, “A limited number of studies have shown some evidence of statistical association of cell phone use and brain tumor risks, but most studies have found no association.”
Firefighters in San Francisco have reported memory problems and confusion after cell phone towers were installed outside of fire stations. The firefighters claim the symptoms stopped when they relocated to stations without equipment nearby.
While supporters and 'pushers' of 5G technology claim that it is safe, the International Association of Firefighters disagrees. Why the NY Times story ignored this January of 2018 CBS San Francisco story is easy to see. Are they pushing an agenda?
The International Association of Firefighters began opposing cell towers on fire stations, after firefighters complained of health problems.
“These firefighters developed symptoms,” says Dr. Gunnar Heuser who conducted a pilot study on firefighters at a station with cell towers.
“The symptoms included problems with memory, problems with intermittent confusion, problems with weakness,” Heuser said.
Heuser says their brain scans suggest even low-level RF can cause cell damage and he worries about more vulnerable groups like kids. “We found abnormal brain function in all of the firefighters we examined,” Heuser said.
Firefighters in California counties from San Francisco to Sacramento to Los Angeles, have reported severe neurological damage, headaches, insomnia, memory problems and confusion after 5G towers were installed outside their stations. When tested, they were found to have brain abnormalities and measurable neurological deficits and firefighters have now filed to be exempt from the California law that would enforce the installment of 5G towers near their places of work.
When their fire stations were relocated away from 5G transmitters, firefighters claimed their symptoms stopped.
More shocking (no pun intended) was that the radiation levels measured were just 1-2/1,000th the FCC’s allowable “safe” limits for non-ionizing radiation. In other words, the FCC considers radiation levels 1,000 times higher than those which debilitated strapping firemen to be safe!
Like the current generation of cellphone technology, 5G has not been adequately tested to determine its impact on health but following the lead of former FCC chairman Tom Wheeler, who eschewed safety testing in favor of economic growth, the industry in the US is moving quickly to establish primacy.
The next section of our story below will take a look at some of the health risks associated with wireless radiation in general from the websites Zero5G and Electric Sense. We originally wrote and published the following excerpt on ANP back in June of 2018.
As Zero5G reports, there is NO 'safe level' of 5G or wireless radiation for people, animals, or nature and even though we are unable to actually 'see' microwaves or electromagnetism, radio-frequency (RF) waves & electromagnetic microwave radiation (EMR), they remain a signicant source of harmful and even deadly 'pollution'.
Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:
DNA single and double strand breaks oxidative damage disruption of cell metabolism increased blood brain barrier permeability melatonin reduction disruption to brain glucose metabolism generation of stress proteins
And as we reported on ANP back on June 3rd, 5G technology is 'silent weapon technology', capable of being used in military crowd control weaponry, and it's being placed in neighborhood's across America. Dane Wigington from Geoengineering Watch had a very, very interesting theory about its roll out.:
Our government continues to do anything they want to the climate, and the planet as a whole. The push to saturate the biosphere with highly destructive 5G transmissions is the most recent alarming example. 5G frequencies are also used for crowd control. Is the power structure preparing for what they certainly know is inevitable? Unfolding global chaos?
So once again, why is 5G tech being fast-tracked into neighborhoods and near schools and other locations of mass gatherings all across America when we have proof of the negative health effects of 5G, and that not from some tinfoil hat conspiracy theorists but the International Association of Firefighters? And firefighters aren't the only ones speaking out.
We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).
Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.
These findings justify our appeal to the United Nations (UN) and, all member States in the world, to encourage the World Health Organization (WHO) to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development. By not taking action, the WHO is failing to fulfill its role as the preeminent international public health agency.
So why didn't the NY Times consult this group of over 100 scientists who are warning that 5G is NOT good but something that could impact human, animal and plant health horrifically? Is the NY Times selling away the health of Americans to help enrich an industry that doesn't have Americans best intentions in minds? Or, does the NY Times simply want us all dead? As we've reported previously on ANP, 5G will run the globalists 'internet of things'.
In the 1st video below from RT, Rick Sanchez takes a look at the NY Times story which attacked RT and Sanchez does a good job exposing the NY Times own connections to the cell phone industry. In the 2nd video below from a 'Ted Talks' with a Silicon Valley engineer turned tech health advocate, we hear all about the dangers of 5G, including seeing some pictures of what it would look like if we could see it and what it would sound like if we could hear it.
In the 3rd video below, we hear from a courageous US Veteran who warns us that NOTHING is immune to the negative health effects of 5G, animals, insects, plants, microbes, human beings. All of nature is under attack. The final video below is a must watch titled "You Must See - 5G APOCALYPSE - THE EXTINCTION EVENT" which Steve Quayle had linked to on his website on Tuesday, a lengthy video which explores everything about 5G that the MSM doesn't want us to know.
And at the very bottom of this story we have embedded a scientific study titled "5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them" which the NY Times story obviously ignored and for good reason: It proves this recent story of their's was 'fake news'.
ONGOING FUNDRAISER:Despite generous donations, the still dwindling advertising revenue over the course of the last two years has forced us to completely deplete all our savings just to survive and continue to keep All News PipeLine online.
So ANP is accepting reader donations. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
