By now, it is obvious to nearly everyone except the most die-hard election fraud denier ostriches and Politico propagandists that there was something seriously wrong with the 2020 election. The D’Souza movie 2000 Mules is only the latest in a long series of investigations showing the existence of massive fraud in battleground swing states as well as every other state. 

That leaves us with only two realistic possibilities: first that Trump won by a landslide but the election was stolen by fraudulent ballot dumps, or two, that due to the all the fraud, we have no idea who actually won. It is unlikely in the extreme, that the current pretender to the office of President actually won fair and square, despite Leftist assurances that the 2020 election was the most secure and fair in history and that any instances of fraud were minor and had no effect on the outcome. 

In just about three months, the clock will run out on the requirement to retain election records, and all the ballots can be trashed, the disks and flash drives wiped, and any evidence remaining in official records can be erased when the 22 month retention period expires. Courts could extend that period if the evidence was required in a lawsuit, but I don’t see that happening in any serious way. 

Early promises to conduct forensic audits of the election have largely stalled. Efforts to decertify the Electoral College votes have likewise gained little traction outside of a few locations. Court challenges have been stymied not from lack of evidence, but rather from the unwillingness of courts to examine the evidence. Officials, such as Secretaries of State whose job includes ensuring the integrity of elections have failed to investigate in any serious way the many allegations of election fraud in their jurisdictions. Virtually no politician, especially in an election year, wants to make election fraud an issue. Meanwhile, the clock keeps ticking. 

No ground to stand upon 

One of the biggest obstacles to legal challenge is something called standing. Generally, in order to be able to file a lawsuit in a case of fraud, the plaintiff must first show that they were harmed by the alleged fraud. This demonstration of direct harm establishes what is known as standing. Without standing, a suit can be dismissed without any consideration of evidence. 

Almost every court that has been presented with a suit alleging fraud in the 2020 election has rejected the suit on the basis of standing, claiming that having one’s vote nullified by election fraud is insufficient to establish standing. The argument was even used by the Supreme Court to deny a suit by Texas alleging that fraud in Pennsylvania and other swing states effectively nullified their votes. 

Why not wait? 

This is an election year, after all, why not wait a few months until we can elect a new batch of congresscritters in November, ones who will act to stop all the damage that is being done by an illegitimate administration? They could even impeach Biden and stop his destructive activities in short order. 

Not!

(ANP FUNDRAISER: Due to heavy censorship by 'big tech' upon ANP articles, we're running a fundraising drive. We also want to thank everybody who has donated to ANP over the years. With donations and ad revenue all that keep ANP online, if you're able, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America's future at this absolutely critical time in US history. During a time of systematic, 'big tech' censorship and widespread institutional corruption, truth-seeking media and alternative views are crucial, and EVERY little bit helps more than you could know!)

The reason is that about the only real tool that Congress would have is the power of budget approval. Any act to repeal Executive Orders or to rein in administrative activities would have to be signed into law by the President. It is unlikely that we could get enough votes to override an executive veto. There is also a possibility of investigations, but those are slow, and given the current disposition of the investigatory agencies, notably the FBI and Garland’s DoJ, any congressional investigations would largely have only theatrical value. 

What do we do now?

In the current controversy around abortion and Roe v Wade with the Supreme Court, the Left is demonstrating just how nasty and intolerant they can be. They dox those who disagree with them, they stage protests and violent demonstrations, They organize opposition and generally do whatever they feel will get their way, without consideration for the opinions or rights of others. The good news is that these methods of intimidation are limited. As the number of opponents grows, their tactics become less effective and their forces divided. 

We have seen how powerful those of us on the Right can be when we choose to step forth. A prime example is the effectiveness of parental protests against CRT and grooming in schools. Such action at the local level can have far-reaching effects even at the national level and is difficult for the Left to disrupt or oppose. 

 

Power to the People 

We can use that power. The national scope of the 2000 Mules movie has made the problem of election fraud highly visible and a matter of national awareness. It has created a momentum that we can exploit to our advantage. Here are some of the things that can be done: 

For those who live in the cities where the movie showed mule activity, individuals and groups can contact their county election officials to enquire what steps they are taking to investigate the activities exposed in the movie. If the officials indicate that there are no plans to investigate, emphasize that you consider it imperative that investigations be conducted and that any wrongdoing is prosecuted. Contact local press to report the official responses, good or bad. Post Twitter notes regarding the responses and generally make the issue visible. 

- Contact the State election officials in the affected swing states and ask the same questions. Emphasize that election integrity is a vital concern and wrongdoing must be investigated. Point out that prosecution of a few individuals is insufficient – they must be leveraged to identify the organizations that supported the activities, and the sources of the funding behind the organizations. Follow the money. Publish their responses and keep track of progress. 

- Contact local police and sheriff departments and urge them to use their investigatory powers. One state has already seen progress from investigation of election fraud in nursing homes. If you know of specific instances, make them known to stimulate investigation. Otherwise, contact TrueTheVote.org to get detailed evidence that local law enforcement can use. 

- Co-mingling fraudulent ballots makes auditing difficult, but direct testimony from the people involved can give information on the number of ballots affected, and who those ballots favored. Prosecution bargains can be used to trade leniency for information leading to identification of higher-level sources and organizations. Use RICO as it was intended. Once numbers of ballots have been identified, keep running totals of what the totals should have been, publish the data, and show the true winners. 

- TrueTheVote intends to release the full data set along with identifying information regarding the organizations supplying the mules with ballots, and supporting ballot harvesting. Watch for the data drop, and make sure that local officials are made aware of the organizations in their jurisdictions that were responsible. Keep enquiring about progress so they cannot avoid investigations. Publish the responses. 

- Contact local voter organizations and party offices. Voter fraud is not a partisan issue. Every voter, Democrat, Republican, Independent, Green, or whatever is affected. Encourage the organizations to make their own contacts to local and state officials. Use newsletters to report progress of investigations. Keep the visibility high. 

- Contact candidates running for office in 2022 and let them know that you want them to champion election integrity investigations now, not sometime in the indefinite future if they are elected. Point out that unless the situation is addressed immediately, they can never know if they won or lost fairly. Let them know that their position on election integrity matters to you and can affect your choices in November. 

- The Left is trying to dismiss the evidence as flawed, targeting innocent parties, insufficient to implicate mules and organizations, and generally discredit the findings. The evidence presented in the 2000 Mules movie, and collected by TrueTheVote is of forensic quality. It is the same sort of evidence that has been used to solve a number of crimes, and was used by Federal agencies to track those who participated in the January 6 activities in DC. If it was good enough for the Feds, it should be good enough for local law enforcement.

- Contact state representatives and encourage them to decertify the Electoral College results in the swing states involved. At this time, there is enough evidence that there was outcome determining fraud that no state involved can actually know what the true 2020 election results were. They will likely try to claim that the election is done and cannot be undone, that there is no provision in the Constitution for decertification, and that it would cause a Constitutional crisis. Direct them to the 10th Amendment which gives States and the People the power to correct such things as a fraudulent election outcome. Do not be deceived – decertification is legal, Constitutional, and possible. 

- If and when sufficient fraud is demonstrated and investigations show coordinated activities beyond the level of a few individuals involving a small number of votes, the Secretaries of State should be contacted and encouraged to file suit with the Supreme Court to declare the 2020 election results null and void. 

Looking around, we see increasing efforts to distract us from the destructive acts of the current administration. The war in Ukraine was used to distract from the horrible evidence presented in the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial data, and to provide a scapegoat for the administration-induced inflation that threatens to grow out of control. Google and media outlets are suppressing information about Hunter Biden and corruption that appears to involve his father as well, The Department of Homeland Security has stood up a “Ministry of Truth” to manage and likely suppress information that disagrees with official positions, making further mockery of our Constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech. 

Each day brings some new distraction and some new abridgement of our rights and freedoms. Already the damage done may be irreparable, but if we are to have any hope at all, we must not delay. Each day counts. We need to stay focused and continue the momentum. 

This story was originally published here. David Robb is a regular contributor to The Blue State Conservative and a practicing scientist who has been working in industry for over 50 years. One of his specialties is asking awkward questions. A large part of his work over the years has involved making complex scientific issues clear and understandable to non-specialists. Sometimes he even succeeds. 

ANP FUNDRAISER: With non-stop censorship and 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.

Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan.

PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.

One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:



Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine

OR Donate to ANP via Subscribestar

Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Stefan Stanford or Susan Duclos can be sent to:

P.O. Box 575McHenry, MD. 21541