Match Exact Phrase    

Whatfinger: Frontpage For Conservative News Founded By Veterans

"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"

March 17, 2019

NZ Killer Created By The Media, For The Media - What The MSM Is Not Reporting From Killer's Manifesto Is More Telling Than What They Are


By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

If you have been listening to the MSM about the New Zealand mass murderer Brenton Tarrant, you would know he is a self-identified racist and "eco-fascist," while many would be under the incorrect assumption that he is a Donald Trump supporter, and a white supremacist, as the media carefully cherry picks and spins portions of his 74 page manifesto.

Some in the media will tell you they don't link directly to that 74 page Manifesto, because it gives "mass killers a platform," but in reality, they only want you to learn what they feel is important for you to know, rather than allowing readers the ability to read the document and come to their own judgements and conclusions.

With that said, we are providing a link to the Manifesto for those that wish to come to their own conclusions, but I am not embedding the document into the website, because frankly we don't want it on ANP.

[UPDATE] Link to manifesto had to be replaced with another because big tech is attempting to completely wipe it off the internet, and other links that had it uploaded are now showing error pages. If the link above is removed, please let us know, either in the comment section or via email and we will find another. It may be horrible history, but this is history and should not be erased off the internet.

(If you appreciate stories like this, please consider donating to ANP to help keep independent journalism alive.)



Readers can see the coordinated media spin in regards to the killer and his motives just by doing an online search, but after having finished reading the manifesto for myself, titled "The Great Replacement," I have found that what the media is not reporting is far more telling than what they are reporting.

Let me provide an example from an op-ed over at USA Today, where the writer wants the media to stop excerpting the Manifesto because it is giving the killer a platform, as he admits that while he refers to Brenton Tarrant as a "white supremacist," the writer also admits he did not read the manifesto "cover to cover."

Besides my abhorrence for the substance, it is hardly worth my time to read “The Great Replacement” from cover to cover. I get it, the author feels marginalized and wronged because he is being denied advantages supposedly promised by virtue of his race.

That is a pity because that tells me he allowed others to define and cherry pick talking points. Had the writer done his own research he would have been able to distinguish the difference between a white "supremacist," and a white "nationalist."  The rantings of Tarrant do not talk about "whites" as being supreme, or better than anyone else,  he pushes the assertion that he believes whites are being replaced by other groups and will become the minority in European countries.

A small point, but representative of the misleading nature of what the media is reporting.

Another example: From the media coverage we have seen since March 14th, one would excused for believing the alleged killer was a Donald Trump supporter, yet on page #16, in a portion where he creates a very bizarre question and answer segment with him as the "interviewer," and one being interviewed, he directly addresses that issue.

Were/are you a supporter of Donald Trump?
As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.

Listening to the media, one would also think they alleged killer was "conservative," or a "right winger," yet on that same page (16), he claims he is both "right wing," and "left wing," qualifying the answer with "depending on the definition."

The point here is if one wants to know the motives, the media isn't providing the information without their own biased spin, so one would have to read the actual document, although fair warning, it is abhorrent. In my personal opinion, the man is a monster, not for his reasoning as much as his belief that killing children is acceptable, calling for the murder of specific individuals, and believing that mass murder is justifiable.



Something the media isn't highlighting or reporting on, is the alleged killer's obsession and disdain for the media itself. In the 74 page manifesto, the media is referenced 17 separate times, while the term press is also referenced a couple of times.

He refers to the media at the bottom of page #20 and page #59 as "anti-white media machines," lumping them in the same category as "Antifa/Marxist/Communists," which he calls "anti-white scum," on page #27.

While Tarrant's actions are hideous, massacring people as they were praying, the media helped create him and his attitude, and CNN offers us recent proof of how "anti-white" the media truly is in their Beto O'Rourke coverage, where in one day, they bemoaned his being a 'white male" 52 different times

How many times have we seen liberals and media outlets attack "white" women for voting for president Trump in 2016, or call his election a "whitelash," among other attacks against white voters? There is a never-ending supply of articles from the liberal media about "white privilege." 

In another portion of his strange interview with himself, he explains why he used firearms rather than other methods he claimed to have the resources to use.  The MSM would provide "extra media coverage," which would incite the gun grabbers in the United States to push for more gun control, while Second Amendment supporters would see it as an attack against our constitutional rights, which would result in "a dramatic polarization of the people in the United States and eventually a fracturing of the US along cultural and racial lines." (Page #11)

On page #13, he explains while the attack was not done for the media coverage, he considered the guaranteed coverage a "bonus," and he wished to survive the attack because, "Survival was a better alternative to death in order to further spread my ideals by media coverage and to deplete resources from the state by my own imprisonment."

On page #16 he describes himself as a fascist, stating "For once, the person that will be called a fascist, is an actual fascist. I am sure the journalists will love that."

At the bottom of page #20, he speaks more about the "corporate run press," and the anti-white media machine" in relationship to democracy, which he considers a "mob rule."

Pages #31 and #32 list a number of links to sexual assaults across Europe, linking to Wikipedia pages on child sex rings, and other types of documented cases, and accuses "the state, the media and the judicial system work in unison to hide these atrocities, in the fear that knowledge of these events would enrage the native people of the West and damage the perception of our new 'Multicultural utopia'."


There are a number of other references to the press and the media within the manifesto, showing that the Tarrant both despised the media and understood exactly how to troll them, to "bait them" as The Atlantic describes them to "gain maximum attention."

Via The Atlantic:

Significant portions of the manifesto appear to be an elaborate troll, written to prey on the mainstream media’s worst tendencies. As the journalist Robert Evans noted, “This manifesto is a trap … laid for journalists searching for the meaning behind this horrific crime. There is truth in there, and valuable clues to the shooter’s radicalization, but it is buried beneath a great deal of, for lack of a better word, ‘sh*tposting.’”

The bottom line here is the media fell for it..... they didn't delve into his obsession with them, they instead repeatedly tried to spin a portion of his answers to justify their own bias against conservatives, while ignoring the other answers which contradicted their narrative.

Note- The media has cherry picked what they wanted the public to know. I have focused on how the manifesto writer used the media's own bias to amplify their own narrative and his. I have deliberately refrained from naming his targets, or highlighting his unforgivable attempt to justify killing children or specific individuals, because his "message" as a whole is not one I wish to give attention to, just the way he understood how to use the media to his benefit, and succeeded when they fell into his "trap."

FEBRUARY/MARCH FUNDRAISER: Despite generous donations, the still dwindling advertising revenue over the course of the last two years has forced us to completely deplete all our savings just to survive and continue to keep All News PipeLine online.

During the months of February and March, ANP is running a fundraising drive.


One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:



Donate monthly from $1 up by becoming an ANP Patron.


Donate Via Snail Mail

Checks or money orders made payable to Stefan Stanford or Susan Duclos can be sent to:

P.O. Box 575
McHenry, MD. 21541


WordPress Website design by Innovative Solutions Group - Helena, MT
comments powered by Disqus

Web Design by Innovative Solutions Group