|
June 28, 2025
Parental Rights Restored By SCOTUS To Refuse To Let Their Children Be Indoctrinated Into The LGBT Agenda - Liberals Are Freaking Out Over Another Supreme Court Ruling
By Susan Duclos - All News Pipeline
A lot of ink and discussion has been dedicated to the recent U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruling which limits local district courts ability from issuing nationwide injunctions to stymie a President's ability to implement the agenda the American people elected said president to do, but another decision came down from SCOTUS on Friday, June 27, 2025, that has received less fanfare, but it an important win for parents that do not want their children indoctrinated into the LGBT agenda.
The case wasMahmoud v. Taylor, and described on the SCOTUS website as "Parents challenging the Montgomery County Board of Educations introduction of certain LGBTQ+-inclusive storybooks, along with the Boards decision to withhold parental opt outs from that instruction, are entitled to a preliminary injunction."
The 135 page ruling, along with dissent by the liberal court justices can be found at this link (PDF).
The ruling is straightforward, allowing parents the right to opt-out of allowing their children to be indoctrinated into the LGBT agenda at their public schools.
It is a huge win for parental rights, but of course visiting liberal websites across the internet, shows how invested the democrats are in attempting to push a lifestyle that goes against many religions, unto the nations children, using the public school system as an indoctrination platform.
Below I will discuss not only the over-the-top reactions by some of those websites, but also basic thoughts on why these types of books, courses or instruction, shouldn't be part of any elementary or middle school teachings.
LIBS THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE TO USE SCHOOLS TO INDOCTRINATE......
Let us get the liberal reaction out of the way, starting with the far leftist website Slate, who titles their piece "Sam Alitos Pride Puppy Ruling Brings Disgrace Upon the Supreme Court." I start with Slate because it is representative of the reaction on the left to this Supreme Court ruling.
Even the headline itself sounds angry, and the short piece below the headline affirms that conclusion.
The Supreme Court dealt a blow to inclusive public education on Friday, declaring in Mahmoud v. Taylor that parents have a constitutional right to prevent their children from seeing books in school that feature LGBTQ+ families......
A blow to inclusive public education? Education isn't about inclusiveness, it is supposed to be about teaching children the basics in life. Math, history, English, science, etc... Not sexual content, not lifestyle choices, but literally teaching children the rudimentary subjects.
A public school system in Maryland had placed these books in classrooms as part of an effort to promote respect for different kinds of families. In response, religious parents sued, arguing that the materials violated their religious freedom by exposing their children to depictions of LGBTQ+ people. In a 63 opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the conservative supermajority agreed, declaring that parents must be allowed to prevent their children from seeing such material. Alito asserted that the storybooks unmistakably convey a particular viewpoint about same-sex marriage from which religious parents must be able to shield their children.
They right that obviously thinking that parental rights to decide how to raise their children, and their authority to decide what is and isn't appropriate for their children to learn about lifestyles, is somehow wrong.
The piece goes on to call this decision "disastrous," to the "consequences for public education and LGBTQ+ equality."
Dahlia Lithwick: I want to talk about a gut-punch case, Mahmoud v. Taylor. Its easy to get bogged down in the details of what is and is not actually in these books. But this is a sea change for parental rights and also the very nature of public education.
What the heck is that deranged women talking about? Sea of change? No, the change was allowing the LGBT agenda to infect the public school system to begin with. Taxpayer funded, public education was, and should have stayed, a place to teach children the basics, not sexual lifestyles.
Matching the derangement of Lithwick, isMark Joseph Stern, who calls a ruling handed parental authority back to the parents "a direct assault on public education and the democratic principles that undergird it...."
Then I see this standalone sentence "Its basically a parental veto power over whats taught in the classroom.."
No, it is the "power" of parents to decide what THEIR CHILDREN are taught. It is the power of parental rights.
The rest of the piece, linked above, is full of the same nonsensical BS from people that believe parents don't have the right to determine what lifestyles their children are taught in public school, or have a say in the religious teachings of their own children.
Due to the globalists war on truth,ANP must depend onreader donationsto keep the website active.
BY WHAT RIGHT?
It is that type of mentality that encourages the next bit of idiocy we see,highlighted by Twitchy, which finds it it as idiotic as we do.
"The Mask Slips! LGBTQ Activist Says Kids 'Belong' to 'Queer' Community and Not 'Assigned' Families"
That headline speaks for itself.
The Associated Press makes the following point, which Slate ignores. These are elementary school-aged children.
With the six conservative justices in the majority, the court reversed lower-court rulings in favor of the Montgomery County school system in suburban Washington. The high court ruled that the schools likely could not require elementary school children to sit through lessons involving the books if parents expressed religious objections to the material.
The lack of an opt-out, Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the court, places an unconstitutional burden on the parents rights to the free exercise of their religion.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in dissent for the three liberal justices that exposure to different views in a multicultural society is a critical feature of public schools. Yet it will become a mere memory if children must be insulated from exposure to ideas and concepts that may conflict with their parents religious beliefs, Sotomayor wrote. Todays ruling ushers in that new reality.
New reality? Only if one ignore more than a hundred years of precedent showing that the LGBT agenda was never pushed on children until the the Obama administration pushed to force schools to allow boys in girls bathrooms and vice versa.
That was a defining moment when the floodgates opened and public schools included the LGBT agenda to their already increasingly communistic teachings and indoctrination.
By what right do liberals think that anyone, whether it is the public school system, or LGBT organizations, the states or even the federal government, have to determine the upbringing, and what sexual or lifestyle teachings, other peoples' children are taught?
Elementary school aged children no less.
Obama certainly showed no respect for parental rights, and the Biden regime targeted parents that dared speak up for their rights in regards to their children at school board meetings.
Via the SCOTUS ruling, written by Alito:
The Court does not accept the Boards characterizations of the LGBTQ+-inclusive instruction as mere exposure to objectionable ideas or as lessons in mutual respect. The storybooks unmistakably convey a particular viewpoint about same-sex marriage and gender. And the Board has specifically encouraged teachers to reinforce this viewpoint and to reprimand any children who disagree. That goes beyond mere exposure. Regardless, the question in cases of this kind is whether the educational requirement or curriculum at issue would substantially interfer[e] with the religious development of the child, or pose a very real threat of undermining the religious beliefs and practices the parent wishes to instill in the child.
Liberals can bitterly complain all they want, but this is a good first step into preventing the indoctrination of our nations children into a lifestyle that the majority of families, and the majority of the nation, do not practice.
BOTTOM LINE....
About time some common sense be brought back into the public educational system.
ANP is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program.ANP Fundraiser: Dangerous, Derogatory, Harmful, Unreliable! Those are some of the exact words used by Googles censors, aka 'Orwelliancontent police,' in describing many of our controversial stories.Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All contributionsare greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless from Susan here on Earth and Stefan from up above.
PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
Or https://www.paypal.me/AllNewsPipeLine
Donate Via Snail Mail
Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:
10510 South AvePoland, OH. 44514
Anything at all at Amazon purchased after clickingthis ANP link will allow ANP to make a bit of revenue, all of which will be used to keep ANP online and to keep a roof over our heads.
Links to other sections of the ANP site:
|
