Match Exact Phrase    

Whatfinger: Frontpage For Conservative News Founded By Veterans

"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"

August 7, 2016

U.S. Preparing For Huge 'Event' As Executive Order Gives Power To UN Troops To Target Americans - Are Clergy Response Teams Being Activated?


By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

A series of events that have happened in rapid succession indicates the U.S. government has accelerated prepartions for some type of massive event. 

Whether that "event" will be a collapse of the global economy, a planned false flag, issues stemming from the upcoming U.S. Election, terrorism, or space related, is frankly neither here nor there, because the actions we are going to go through below, point by point, indicate a long-term plan on the part of the government that is coming to fruition.



A recent Executive Order by Barack Obama was issued on July 1, 2016, titled "United States Policy on Pre- and Post-Strike Measures to Address Civilian Casualties in U.S. Operations Involving the Use of Force," less than a month after the May 2016  headlines that the U.S. had pledged support for a "set of principles that give a green light for United Nations peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts," allows the United Nations to use force on U.S. citizens.

Via Military Times:

The United States has announced its support for a set of principles that give a green light for U.N. peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told a high-level U.N. meeting Wednesday focusing on the responsibility to protect civilians that the United States was "proud" and "humbled" to join 28 other countries that have pledged to abide by the 18 pledges.

U.N. peacekeepers from these 29 countries are now required to act in cases where civilians are in danger.

Those 18 pledges, part of what is called the Kigali Principles, are not specified in any of the articles linked above, but all are detailed in the this PDF (starting on page 4), indicating that under the guise of "protecting" civilians amidst conflict, Barack Obama has just handed U.S. sovereignty and the right to decide the appropirate course of action for America, over to the United Nations.

For example, look at the language in Pledges 7 and 8:

7. To avoid undue delay in protecting civilians, by investing our contingent commander with the authority to use force to protect civilians in urgent situations without the need for further consultations with capital.

8. Not to hesitate to take action to protect civilians, in accordance with the rules of engagement in the absence of an effective host government response or demonstrated willingness to carry out its responsibilities to protect civilians.

In other words ladies and gentlemen, if there is a conflict in the United States of America and the UN does not agree with the government's response, they can take whatever action they deem appropriate and they can do so without consulting the "capital."

Pledges 9 and 10 are equally disturbing once number 8 established the UN can take whatever actions they want:

9. To demand clarity from the UN and mission leadership on our rules of engagement, including under which circumstances the use of force is appropriate.

10. To seek to identify, as early as possible, potential threats to civilians and proactively take steps to mitigate such threats and otherwise reduce the vulnerability of the civilian population.

So the UN decides the rules of engagement, they decide when force is appropriate and they get to target anyone they deem a "threat" and proactively take steps to mitigate such threats...... anyone thinking now how the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, has demanded" robust gun regulation," in America?

Ask yourself what happens when the UN deems all gun owners a threat?  

It gets worse.

It isn't only gun owners that would be targeted as ANP was reminded via email this morning to look back to the 2009 MIAC Report, where it was determined that a U.S. citizen can be considered a potential dangerous "militia member" if they oppose: The United Nations; The New World Order; Gun Control; The violation of Posse Comitatus; The Federal Reserve; The Income Tax; The Ammunition and Accountability Act; A possible Constitutional Convention; The North American Union; Universal Service Program Radio Frequency Identification (RFID); Abortion, or; Illegal Immigration.

How many readers oppose one or more of those?

A point of interest about the UN "peacekeeping" troops that Obama has just given permission to target Americans - They are comprised of personnel from 120 countries, and as of 2015, the leading contributor is Bangladesh where nearly 90 percent are Islamics.

Full list of contributing countries can be found at the UN peacekeeping resources page.

With accusations that the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton are responsible for the rise of ISIS and ignored intellence reports prefacing the rise of ISIS, we also have to wonder if the Obama admin isn't setting up Christians in America for slaughter by refusing to release or inform Christians that have been targeted by ISIS on their recent "kill list."

We also note that during the Obama administration both Russian and Chinese troops have been allowed to train on U.S. soil and according to the UN peacekeeping resource page, both are contributing members to providing troops to the UN, with China providing 173 police, 28 military experts and 2,444 troops to the UN.

Is it any wonder why a number of American citizens are concerned about the continued pre-positioning of United Nations vehicles and troops on American soil



A SQ alert dated August 7, 2016, describes an open access call with participants including the State's Attorney's General of Virginia, New York, Connecticut, and Massachuesetts, along with DHS, FEMA, and the ADL - Topic was "Gun confiscation." 

It is not known if someone risked their life to get this conference public, hit the wrong switch by accident, or put this info out to see who would leak it.....................

Bottom line, the plan was for the DHS, FEMA, and local police, with massive assets, to bull rush the gun owning citizenry of these states, seize their weapons, and execute this op so quickly that there could be no retaliation from pro American forces to stop it in time.

If that wasn't bad enough, those participating in the teleconference who were planning this actually began to ridicule those front line people who would be engaged in this treason. Apparently, they even joked how easily it would be to throw the front line people under the bus in the end so they could take the blame and the real planners would walk away clean.

The teleconference was only open access to state and federal agencies.

Guess who just happened to be listenening? The police! (We won't say which....) They had access over their computers in their squad cars.

We're told that they made disks of the 2 hour meeting and are distributing them among other trusted police groups.

We're also told that they are not releasing this meeting to the media or public as to not be the dupes who were given sensitive info and released it publically simply by TPTB to see who they can't trust.... yup, makes sense to me.

The call was described by Mark Koernke of The Intelligence Report broadcast over The Micro and Liberty Tree Radio on 8/4/16 in the 8am hour broadcast (around 20 minutes in) LINK TO THAT HERE

Another interesting point was made via a forwarded email to ANP, where we see the U.S. Navy is getting rid of the "blueberries" camouflage uniform to be replaced with "woodland," with the emailer noting "This is somewhat alarming to those of us who think outside the box. The Navy, is going to woodland camo. Not standard blues, not olive drab, not desert, but woodland. That camo would only work in an area that has dense tree foliage, like the US???"

Remember Jade Helm where the U.S. military pre-positioned massive military assets all across the United States, while using American soil for their training, including naming U.S. states as "hostile." Were they preparing for the battle they were eventually going to be fighting?



In May 2006, Paul Joseph Watson reported a Pastor had come forward to reveal that FEMA had begun "training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation." 

Those reports were confirmed  by Channel 12, KSL News, which reported the following in 2012:

If martial law were enacted here at home, like depicted in the movie "The Siege", easing public fears and quelling dissent would be critical. And that's exactly what the 'Clergy Response Team' helped accomplish in the wake of Katrina.

Dr. Durell Tuberville serves as chaplain for the Shreveport Fire Department and the Caddo Sheriff's Office. Tuberville said of the clergy team's mission, "the primary thing that we say to anybody is, 'let's cooperate and get this thing over with and then we'll settle the differences once the crisis is over.'"

Such clergy response teams would walk a tight-rope during martial law between the demands of the government on the one side, versus the wishes of the public on the other. "In a lot of cases, these clergy would already be known in the neighborhoods in which they're helping to diffuse that situation," assured Sandy Davis. He serves as the director of the Caddo-Bossier Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness.

While the Clergy Response Teams were waved away as "conspiracy" in 2006 before their existence was confirmed years later, we now see some strange events being reported by readers as to their long-time Pastors having simply "up and left," their churches and we have to wonder if the CRT is being activated nationwide, if some are being brought in to participate elsewhere and if others aren't just leaving now because the orders are coming down and they refuse to lead their sheep to slaughter.

In Stefan Stanford's UN Troops Across America article from August 6, 2016, the following reports came in from readers:

Lillith:  "my pastor of 14 yrs up And left!!! He told us he had no prior desire for a different pastorate and....Then Just left.... He gave three weeks notice. Now.. We're just told our youth minister just resigned.. They didn't even stay around to say goodbye..they just went poof and I can tell you almost with certainty both were FEMA pastors. Somethings deadly close for them to leave so suddenly."

PAL responded "My sisters pastor of 18yrs, up and quit in the middle of service 3 weeks ago, saying he wanted to spend more time with his family. He had been asked to go to a conference last fall regarding "Immigrants". Day after he quit the people were asked (by the district superintendent) to be host to some Immigrants who would be arriving in 30 days. My sister was asked to cook for them but she was told no pork or beef. All is not what is seems.

Kevin noted that his Pastor preached about "submission and authority," so much that Kevin actually asked him if he was part of the Clergy Response Team. Prepper Girl shared that when she gave a series of survival classes in her church the Pastor called her a "conspiracy theorist" and told her she was "making the church look bad." PROUD indicated that a local minister was asking very probing questions while they were working out in a gym with reader 'idontknow' highlighting a discussion after a school shooting in NM, where his Pastor indicated he was "trained" to deal with the aftermath but was sworn to secrecy."

(The entire discussion segment of that thread about the Clergy Reponse Teams is eye opening and can be found by scrolling down the comments until readers reach that part.)


Events happening in rapid succession suggest something big is being prepared for and with Barack Obama basically handing over control of America in times of "conflict" to United Nationas control, the very same organization that has been pushing for "gun control," we find the report on the "open access" gun confiscation call to be a very huge red flag as to what comes directly after the "event."

They are preparing for something huge.... we should be as well.

WordPress Website design by Innovative Solutions Group - Helena, MT
comments powered by Disqus

Web Design by Innovative Solutions Group