"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
October 27, 2024
The Rise of Political Vitriol - Trump/Harris Battle May Be Recalled As A Relatively Peaceful Contest Where The Harshest Insults Were Just 'Hes Worse Than Hitler' Or 'Shes A Communist'
American presidential campaigns have become increasingly vitriolic. One of President Bidens campaign organizations even explicitlycompared Trump to Hitler, Terms like fascist and mentally unbalanced are commonplace. The venerableAtlanticmagazine recently rana storytitled, Trump Is Speaking Like Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini. AHarvard Business Reviewessaywarned: The campaign vitriol has already begun, and many leaders are dreading what this is going to bring into their workplaces and onto their teams. Worries abound that this conflictmay become violentif one side feels that the other has won unfairly.
What explains this vitriol? Are we becoming a less civil nation? Are the election stakes so high that the prospect of losing invites violence? A more plausible explanation is that the Internet, in undermining face-to-face relationships and thus promoting social disengagement, allows extreme sentiments to go unchecked. In an earlier time, somebody who insisted that the Republican presidential nominee was a secret Russian agent would find scant support among friends and family, and absent social reinforcement, the wild opinion would likely dissipate.
Today, by contrast,nothingimpedes the unhinged, and these unfiltered opinions quickly enter the marketplace of ideas. Yesterdays activist would take his soapbox to the public square and speak to a mere handful; today this soapbox has a keyboard and sits on his desk and provides direct access to millions of potential listeners. Those who believe that the Holocaust never happened canfind multiple websitesconfirming this belief.
Historical studies of public opinion show this transformation. In 5th-century B.C. Athens, the marketplace of ideas was literally a marketplace -- theAgora-- where citizens traded gossip and opinions. Like olive oil, ideas were sold, and nonsense was rejected. Crackpots would not get very far, and if he persisted, the penalty was being ostracized. Public discussions could thus yield some good ideas while discarding the noise. The New England town hall also embodies this ancient give-and-take of ideas.
In early 18th-century London, some 2000 coffeehouses provide settings where people could discuss almost everything while Parisiansalonsserved a similar purpose. Germany had theirTishgeschellschaften(table societies).
These forums moderated wackiness. Those expressing half-baked conspiracies would quickly invite ridicule, and nobody wanted to be embarrassed. Or perhaps others would add their own two cents, strengthening the argument, offering evidence and logical structure, so what began as a dubious idea might be refashioned into something useful.
Worthy ideas expressed in one coffeehouse might be spread more widely thanks tojournalist reporting, most famouslyThe Tatleredited by Richard Steel, Samuel JohnsonsThe Rambler,or Oliver GoldsmithsCitizen of the World.These publications served as the Internet of the day, but opinions were scrutinized before being written down, so nonsense was filtered out.
By contrast, todays communications via the Internet liberate people from social constraints. No friends or family can intervene, and while London of the 18th century offered 2000 coffeehouses to serve as a soapbox, todays Internet provides thousands of sites catering to anything imaginable, In fact,12 million people believethat the U.S. is secretly run by lizards. Entering the public debate is easy. Just create ones own blog, write for an existing webzine, become a commentator or join a Facebook group of fellow cranks, all the while enjoying the comforts of ones home. While guidelines exist, they are relatively minor and largely concern matters of language.
The social pressures that encouraged moderation no longer exist. Deranged fans of dark plots would undoubtedly have been asked to leave Parissalons,but the Internet lacks such gatekeepers. Incentives may exist in the opposite direction since radical views will stand out among thousands of duller rival forums. A thoughtful plain vanilla analysis of Donald Trumps personality is far less riveting than proof of his methamphetamine addiction. Looney ideas have the advantage of breaking through the clutter.
The Internet also lacks the normal rules of decorum. No London coffeehouse customer would be allowed to hurl insults and scream at fellow patrons since this would ruin business. This imposed civility is no longer true. Thisanonymoushyper-vitriol of often called flaming or a flame war, and given that most people are adverse to such rancor, flaming can push discussions to even greater extremes. Few reasonable people will participate if regularly insulted, and so the forum is soon dominated by true believers. This is far different from normal social groups where harmony is the norm,
This trend is compounded by the rise of business models built around targeting narrow populations. This is a shift frombroadcasting tonarrowcasting. For example, prior to the 1990s and the rise of cable TV, major networks attracted a politically diverse viewership, and thus hewed to the middle, even avoiding politics altogether. Extremism drove many away, so catering to a narrow ideological fraction was financial suicide.
But the rise of cable TV encouraged targeting thinner and thinner population slices, so while MSNBC tilted left, Fox Cable News shifted rightward, and programming increasingly became politically one-sided. Now those with distinct points on the political spectrums follow news and entertainment reinforcing their narrow political views. A comparable pattern occurred in websites, podcasts, and other media outlets so that what might have once been labeled extreme now appears perfectly normal.
Similarly, major newspapers like the NYTimesonce targeted large metropolitan areas with an ideologically mixed readership. News reporting thus avoided ideological extremes to avoid losing readers. Today, thanks to on-line subscriptions, theTimeshas a national readership, and while those on the far Left may only be 10% of the population, their total national size is sufficient to make money. In the case of theTimes,tilting coverage leftward thus becomes a viable business model. All and all, the Internet makes it profitable to seek out once ignored markets. A black feminist in rural Iowa once had few options. Today, thanks to the Internet, shecan daily pursue this interest. Multiply this targeting by a thousand, and it is no wonder that Americans increasingly live in bubbles that reenforces their existing views so once extreme views have become normal.
These factors are unlikely to be reversed. People living in an environment saturated with radical Marxist ideology are not about to seek out ideological diversity by creating a discussion group welcoming all viewpoints. Why attend a meeting and risk being criticized for your allegedly utopian views and told that your anti-Trump acrimony is out of order? Ditto for those on the Right -- who wants to hear that obsessing over urban crime is just dog whistle white racism?
Political life may become even more vitriolic as older American who remember an earlier era of moderation are replaced by those who know only ideological homogeneity. Indeed, many youngsters have become so addicted to their electronic devices that they struggle withthe most basic social interactions. At some point the current acrimonious Trump/Harris battle may be recalled as a relatively peaceful contest where the harshest insults was just hes worse than Hitler or shes a communist. The good old days.
PLEASE HELP ANP-With attacks against Independent Media, contributions to help keep voices that counter the "official narrative" is criticalAnything at allANP readers can do to help usishugely appreciated.)
Checks or money orders made payable to Susan Duclos can be sent to:
10510 South Ave
Poland, OH. 44514
Anything at all at Amazon purchased after clickingthis ANP link will allow ANP to make a bit of revenue, all of which will be used to keep ANP online and to keep a roof over our heads.
