Those familiar with Fox News host Sean Hannity know that right before something huge breaks, if he is aware of the impending news, he uses Twitter to give his followers a heads up by Tweeting "Tick Tock." Previously after he has done so, a major news event broke publicly, such as back in August when he gave his heads up and immediately following it highlighted how a U.S. congressman traveled to meet with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, bringing a message back to President Trump.
TICK TOCK, BOOM!
Last night Hannity did it again, and this too had to do with Julian Assange, first highlighting a tweet from Assange which consisted of nothing but a code of numbers mixed with letters, with Hannity tweeting a few question marks, immediately followed by Hannity saying "Wow!!!!! Tick Tock," as he highlighted another message from Assange, stating "Evidence emerges of a conspiracy to take down the DNC as far back as 2010," with a link to a Breitbart article from 2010 on Assanges belief's about conspiracies, with Assange providing a screen shot to one specific paragraph from that article:
He’s right. Indeed, you can take his example further by imagining what would happen to, say, the DNC, if it suffered a massive Wikileak of secret data. Can you imagine the sort of things that Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod and David Plouffe say outside public hearing? It seems entirely possible that a leak of the contents of their e-mail for one month would be exceedingly damaging to them, possibly even career ending.
Sounds a lot like what happened to the DNC and the Clinton campaign in 2016.
It is noteworthy that this is not the first time Assange has used a "code," that spawned a lot of online chatter, including false death rumors, and while this "code" is different than the ones from October 2016, those previous ones were put out in the midst of those leaked DNC/Podesta emails that devastated the Clinton campaign, leading many to believe that something big might be about to drop.
While that is interesting, the follow up messaging and specific connections are far more telling as Assange makes it very clear he is going directly after Hillary Clinton again. She is no longer a presidential candidate, no longer a candidate for any political office and has only been in the news for her "book tour" where she is still casting blame on everyone but herself for losing the presidential election.
Assange has consistently maintained he is in possession of proof that supposedly would blow the official "Russian collusion," and "Russian meddling in the election" narratives, out of the water.
He has even offered that information to special counsel Mueller, who has not even bothered to follow up on it, despite, as Hannity yet again asserts, Assange is "the ONE PERSON on earth that would know of alleged Trump/Russia Collusion. It’s time for Mueller & Justice Dept to GET INFO!" Assange responded to Hannity by saying "No approach from Mueller, Senate & House intel committees, FBI, DoJ, or any other department, at any time on the issue. What is one to make of it?"
Hannity followed up by highlighting a few more of Assange's messages, which we will get to, but the last tweet from Hannity, stating one word, "BOOM!!," once again highlighted an Assange statement saying "Hillary Clinton has a friend in her war against WikiLeaks perfect authentication record. Vladimir Putin," with a link to another 2010 article from BBC, which was reporting about a treasure trove of Wikileaks documents against Russia, and Assange again provided a screen shot to a statement made by Russian president Vladimir Putin:
He said of the Wikileaks affair: "Some experts believe that somebody is deceiving Wikileaks to undermine their reputation, to use them for their own political purposes later on. That is one of the possibilities."
ASSANGE GOES AFTER HILLARY CLINTON....AGAIN
Julian Assange has been a busy little beaver on his Twitter feed as he addresses Clinton's most recent claims, including that "Julian Assange colluded with Russia to help Donald Trump win US election," where she recently told ABC Australia that Wikileaks timed the release of the DNC/Podesta emails "to do her maximum damage or distract from Mr Trump's campaign scandals."
Her reference was to the Access Hollywood tape released by Washington Post about Donald Trump last October, which came out less than an hour before Wikileaks released their first batch of 2,000 Podesta emails.
Mrs Clinton said the release of the emails blunted the impact of the tape.
"It was covered dramatically and wall-to-wall for about 48 hours," she said.
"WikiLeaks, which in the world in which we find ourselves promised hidden information, promised some kind of secret that might be of influence, was a very clever, diabolical response to the Hollywood Access tape.
Assange responds to Clinton's conspiracy theory, stating "On Clinton's "timing" conspiracy theory. That we had a pending publication about to launch on the election was everywhere in the media for days. We were meant to launch that morning. It is the Trump tape that was moved forward from Monday to Friday." He then linked to a TMZ article, showing that NBC was holding the tape, but that "NBC execs had a plan to time the release of the Donald Trump audio to have maximum impact on both the 2nd presidential debate and the general election."
We've told you the plan got derailed by Hurricane Matthew. Execs decided the wall-to-wall coverage of the storm would mess up the plan to dominate the news with the Trump tape, so they were going to hold it until Monday. It didn't sit well with some staffers who wanted it out pre-debate, so it was leaked to the Washington Post.
Since Clinton's assertion that Wikileaks that timed their release as a "diabolical response" to "blunt the impact" of the Access Hollywood tapes, can be debunked with a simple search which shows Wikileaks had already been releasing massive amounts of DNC emails and that another batch was imminent, and as we now know top names in the media were colluding with the Clinton campaign, some might logically conclude that it was the Access Hollywood tape's early release that was the "diabolical response" timed to "blunt the impact" of the Wikileaks Podesta emails, which roiled the Clinton campaign.
Which failed spectacularly.
Assange has a few more things to say about Hillary Clinton and as responses to another of her claims in that ABC Australia interview, when she claimed ""If he's such a martyr of free speech, why doesn't WikiLeaks ever publish anything coming out of Russia? You don't see damaging, negative information coming out about the Kremlin on WikiLeaks."
Assange offers up a link to Wikileaks' Spy Files Russia, stating "Our last Russian expose was three weeks ago." In that same message, Assange writes "WikiLeaks has a pristine record for accuracy. HRC is not a credible person. The primary cause of her downfall was her own Machiavellian scheme to elevate Mr. Trump ("Pied Piper")"
Well.... looks like that too failed spectacularly.
SOMETHING WRONG WITH HILLARY CLINTON - 'COLD CREEPINESS RARELY SEEN'
On October 15, 2017, Assange linked to another interview clip with Clinton where she is calling him a tool of Russian intelligence, where he writes "There's something wrong with Hillary Clinton. It is not just her constant lying. It is not just that she throws off menacing glares and seethes thwarted entitlement. Watch closely. Something much darker rides along with it. A cold creepiness rarely seen."
SPECULATION RUNNING RAMPANT
With Hannity's tweets and Mike Cernovich, who first exposed the names of the Obama administration officials that were "unmasking" Trump campaign members, stating "Tomorrow is going to be big," on October 15, 2017, then asserting that "Hannity knows," along with the Assange tweets about Clinton, speculation has been running rampant as to whether Julian Assange is about to publish something new in regards to Clinton.
Some think that Wikileaks are in posession of the 33,000 missing emails, others are talking about new evidence in the "Pizzagate" aka Pedogate theories, because Wikileaks has been pushing news of 2014 leaked emails from Sony Pictures regarding Harvey Weinstein, who has Hollywood embroiled in a sex scandal of major proportions, one of which mentions Valerie Jarrett, who served as the Senior Advisor to Barack Obama.
Just going through the tweets linked throughout the article will show many theories being thrown out there by other social media users, from the possible to the over-the-top.
Perhaps a large hint on what is coming, was given by Sean Hannity on October 12, 2017, when he announced something "huge" was going to be revealed on Monday, October 16, 2017, hinting that it might have something to do with the Hatvey Weinstein scandal, telling people they don't want to miss it, then saying "Tick Tock."
BOTTOM LINE
While Clinton has been accusing Wikileaks of working with Russia since before the presidential election, when the initial DNC emails started being published, and has continued to do so throughout 2017, and Assange has responded periodically, his focus on Clinton last night and again this morning, along with Hannity's messages, given that Hannity has interviewed and spoken to Assange throughout the years, indicates that Wikileaks and Assange may be ready to drop something big.
This is a developing story and will be updated if something does indeed drop.
While Hannity didn't specify if his revelations would be on his podcast or his Fox News segment, we are embedding what should be his Fox News show, scheduled to go live at 9:00pm , below:
