Match Exact Phrase    

Whatfinger: Frontpage For Conservative News Founded By Veterans

"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"

June 17, 2016

'We're Heading In A Very Dangerous Direction' - Tis The Season Of Treason In America As The Globalists Kick Their Plans To Disarm The American People Into Overdrive


By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. 18 U.S. Code 2381 - Treason.

The story over at The Atlantic tells us that according to Donald Trump (and many others), "Barack Obama puts America's 'enemy over our allies', even using the word 'treason' to describe what we're now witnessing from our present 'commander-in-chief'. A new story from Front Page Mag tells us that Obama has just invited top communist military and intelligence officials to inspect US defense facilities. Why would he do such a thing as opening up vital national security secrets to 'narco-terrorists'? Has Obama already surrendered? 

“President Obama claims to know our enemy, and yet he continues to prioritize our enemy over our allies, and for that matter, the American people,” Trump said in a statement to the AP. “When I am President, it will always be America First.” 

Trump and The Atlantic story aren't the only ones throwing the 'treason' word around and even former presidential candidate and Arizona senator John McCain recently launched into Barack Obama, saying that Obama was 'directly responsible for the Orlando terror attack' because he's allowed the 'rise of ISIS' on his watch. He later backed down on that statement, sort of, saying that Obama wasn't responsible for ISIS' rise but his 'national security decisions' were. Seriously? If Obama's DECISIONS are responsible for the 'rise of ISIS', so is Obama. 


While we are not here to play 'judge, jury nor executioner', we have published story after story after story on ANP outlining what appears to be decisions made at the highest level of government in America that have put Americans at risk while comforting and aiding our enemies. From decisions made by Hillary Clinton's State Department that led to the loss of lives in Benghazi to both Hillary and Obama leaving the doors wide open to as many terrorists as they want to come into this country we have to ask, why haven't Obama and Hillary ALREADY been charged with treason?

It's been proven that Hillary's State Department blocked the FBI investigation into the Orlando killers mosque while we now have absolute proof that the Orlando killers father visited the Hillary Clinton State Department at least 4 times! What was this mass murderer's father doing visiting Hillary's State Department? The fact that this man, who wanted to be the 'future president of Afghanistan,' also HATED America and WROTE OPEN LETTERS to Obama should not be overlooked.

Is it just a coincidence that the father of a man who allegedly gunned down 50 Americans has ties to both Obama and Clinton? Taking that one step further, is it just a coincidence that this mass murder and slaughter, the killer who has now been proven to have ties to both Hillary Clinton and Obama, is now being used by the same administration in a very real attempt to take Americans guns away? We'll take a look below at some recent and very disturbing news we have just learned along the gun confiscation front. 


America now has a very real 'conundrum' and the answer to it will not be solved easily. According to Jeh Johnson, the head of the Department of Homeland Security, 'gun control' is now a 'homeland security' matter. One author and political activist takes that statement of Johnson's one step further. According to Andy Parker, father of the reporter allegedly gunned down on air in Virginia last year, any politicians who are NOT for very strong gun control are committing treason against America. 

We'll contrast that with a story recently written by Brandon Ward over at World Events and the Bible who claims that Trump, the entire GOP and the National Rifle Association should be considered treasonous for even thinking about restraining the rights of Americans to buy guns after Trump recently tweeted that Americans on the no-fly list or terrorist watch list shouldn't be able to buy guns as seen in the Tweet below. What Ward pointed out in his story that Mr. Trump didn't point out in his tweet is that there are possibly thousands and thousands of law-abiding American citizens on the terrorist watchlist and no-fly lists right now and even Maryland Congressman Steny Hoyer has stated that he has no idea whatsoever how a person's name gets on that list nor how they can get their name off the list. 


With a government that puts Christians, those who still follow the supreme body of laws in the land, the US Constitution, survivalists, 2nd Amendment supporters, and Conservatives on 'no-fly lists' and 'terror watchlists' JUST BECAUSE they are Christians or Conservatives or survivalists, we'll soon have a very, very real problem if government thinks that it will prevent these law-abiding American citizens from owning a means to protect themselves. 

So here is the very real problem that we must find an answer to before America turns into total utter madness and chaos. 
How can we prevent terrorists such as Omar Mateen from getting guns while making sure that law-abiding American citizens still have access to protect themselves from such terrorists as Mateen? As we learn below the MIAC list we see below, the United Nations now has a very real interest in disarming the American people. 

Do we have to totally revamp the 'no-fly lists' and 'terror watchlists' as recently suggested by Susan Duclos as a means to that end, to ensure that law-abiding Americans are still able to protect themselves against the very real terrorists that Obama and Clinton have allowed in? According to the MIAC list seen below, if you fall into one of those categories, you may not be able to purchase a gun to defend yourself if government takes the 'disarmament agenda' to the extreme. Are you on that list? At ANP, we'd be fools to believe that we wouldn't be on 'the list' though, personally, I'm a life-long anti-war activist and a danger to no-one....though it's long been warned that words and ideas are bulletproof and therefor dangerous. 


A recent warning by the head of the CIA that ISIS plans on increasing their attacks worldwide should be looked at as another sign that things are going to get much worse before they get much better. How can we stop terrorists like Mateen can't get guns, who flew totally under the radar despite being surveilled by the FBI and even worked for a government contractor while making sure that law-abiding American citizens are able to keep their means of protection from terrorists and criminals who will never turn over their weapons, even if ordered to do so?

As we can see in this United Nations career posting, the UN is looking for disarmament, demobilization and reintegration officers right now if you're looking for a job. What is the UN's DDR and should we be concerned? As we read in the statement below videos, this is all headed in a very, very dangerous direction. From the Free Dictionary.:

Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration

Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR) is an applied strategy for executing successful peacekeeping operations, and is generally the strategy employed by all UN Peacekeeping Operations. Disarmament entails the physical removal of the means of combat from ex-belligerents (weapons, ammunition, etc.); demobilization entails the disbanding of armed groups; while reintegration describes the process of reintegrating former combatants into civilian society, ensuring against the possibility of a resurgence of armed conflict.

Prerequisites for DDR

DDR is somewhat different from the blanket term "peacekeeping", in that DDR requires certain conditions to be effectively implemented. They include, but are not necessarily limited to:

  • Security - conflict in the targeted area must be completely or at least nearly halted, and a significant deterrent force must be in place to ensure no renewal of conflict. Without this guarantee of security, DDR cannot be effectively implemented, as trust between former belligerents - an integral part of the DDR process - cannot develop.
  • Inclusion of all ex-belligerents - without cooperation between all armed groups, DDR cannot succeed. Unless all combatants and factions are disarmed, the potential for a resurgence of conflict is too great.
  • Sufficient funding - without enough funding to be completed, DDR operations cannot succeed, as incomplete reintegration of ex-combatants leaves the possibility of a renewal of conflict.

Influence of DDR on the peace process

DDR is often carried out as a technical process, whereas it is in fact a highly political one. It is often overlooked that DDR is not only shaping the demand for security, e.g. to what extent the people still feel unsafe due to prevailing presence of armed groups in their proximity, but also the supply of security. The supply of security here refers to the amount of combatants integrated into regular security forces after the conflict has ended through means of DDR, thus influencing the structure and the organization of the newly emerged security sector. If too many soldiers, policemen or paramilitary troops are present, the DDR campaign has not altered the level of insecurity, but rather changed its cause.[1]

Requirements for successful DDR implementation

There are 6 aspects to a successful DDR conversion:

  1. Reduction of military expenditure
  2. Reorientation of military research and development
  3. Conversion of the arms industry
  4. Demobilization and reintegration
  5. Redevelopment of troops
  6. Safe disposal and management of "surplus weapons"

Demobilization is one aspect of conversion.


To assess the impact of demobilization one has to consider the resources involved, the dynamic processes of production, redistribution and the different factors and actors in policy making and implementation. The ultimate objective of demobilization and reintegration efforts should be to improve the welfare of people. Demobilization of combatants frees human potential that can contribute to achieving these objectives.

How do we in America prevent terrorists from getting weapons that they can use to slaughter the American people while ensuring that Americans still maintain the ability to protect themselves against said terrorists? Is simply disarming the nation via the UN the answer? As we have reported previously on ANP, such a move would likely lead to millions dead as we all know terrorists and criminals won't be handing over their guns. So, why should law-abiding Americans? At the same time, can America afford to allow anybody to purchase weapons? Omar Mateen is one perfect example of why we shouldn't.

We need to have a major discussion in America about guns, self-defense and treason. It's clear that widespread disarmament on the level of the United Nations is not the answer. We should pray that we come up with an answer before any more people are harmed and killed in America due to terrorists getting guns and following jihad.

In the first video below from FaceLikeTheSun our videographer takes a look at the recent Orlando shooting and its ties to the UN disarmament agenda, the 2016 global reset and recent news about the Pope while in the 2nd video below, we hear directly from the UN about Orlando and what may be coming next as the globalists kick their plans for a 'new world order' into overdrive. 

Thanks very much for these info articles, if one looks up and does the research, This is the very mechanism, along with all the “be as God” surveillance 'Data Banks', that are being used to implement the AC agenda to be forced upon all. It all fits with the “boil a frog in a pot by slowly increasing the temp and the Frog will never know it is or has been cooked until it is too late. This is the Very method being used and further attempted by the present “leadership” And those in the democratic side of seeking control, something that all those Of evil fully desire as they quest to “be as God” just as their master lucifer. "Hell on earth is already being implemented as the stupid “frogs” gleefully Swim in “the pot”. Part of their plan, or that of lucifer it should be said, is the Demise of many souls to be claimed for hell, for he cares not about any humans Or those who “think” they will be the winning and surviving elite after all the Ensuing chaos. May Almighty God give strength for endurance, graces, to Those who oppose this vile evil. The final evil portrayed in the Holy Bible, yet So many fools still refuse to fully believe, accept, and put into practice. Woe unto them, for they have chosen evil, thus they shall have for all eternity! Jesus is Lord.

WordPress Website design by Innovative Solutions Group - Helena, MT
comments powered by Disqus

Web Design by Innovative Solutions Group