The jury is still out as to whether or not the mRNA gene therapy injection permanently alters your DNA. This article will provide an overview of both sides of the issue and why it matters.
Genetics. deoxyribonucleic acid: an extremely long macromolecule that is the main component of chromosomes and is the material that transfers genetic characteristics in all life forms, constructed of two nucleotide strands coiled around each other in a ladderlike arrangement with the sidepieces composed of alternating phosphate and deoxyribose units and the rungs composed of the purine and pyrimidine bases adenine, guanine, cytosine, and thymine: the genetic information of DNA is encoded in the sequence of the bases and is transcribed as the strands unwind and replicate. Compare base pair, gene, genetic code, RNA.
Genetics. ribonucleic acid: any of a class of single-stranded molecules transcribed from DNA in the cell nucleus or in the mitochondrion or chloroplast, containing along the strand a linear sequence of nucleotide bases that is complementary to the DNA strand from which it is transcribed: the composition of the RNA molecule is identical with that of DNA except for the substitution of the sugar ribose for deoxyribose and the substitution of the nucleotide base uracil for thymine. [There are 3 types of RNA: messenger, transfer, and ribosomal.]
VIDEO: DNA and RNA - Overview of DNA and RNA Nucleus Biology Jan 21, 2022 [playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner so it must be watched on youtube]
A more detailed and scientific version of how DNA and RNA interact can be found in Forterre & Grosjean's book Madame Curie bioscience Database - The Interplay between RNA and DNA Modifications: Back to the RNA World. Suffice it to say, DNA holds the instruction on how to make all the proteins a body needs and the three types of RNA actually create the proteins.
VIDEO:DNA and RNA - Transcription 2021 Nucleus Biology [playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner so it must be watched on youtube]
There are more than one hundred ways an RNA molecule can be chemically modified after it is synthesized. The functions of many of these modifications, collectively referred to as the epitranscriptome, are largely unknown.
VIDEO 2016 How Your Body Creates Proteins Nucleus Medical Media Jul 11, 2024 [playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner so it must be watched on youtube]
Research on mRNA gene therapy injections prior to covid-19
Verbeke, Lentacker, DeSmedt, & Dewitte in their 2019 paper Three Decades of Messenger RNA Vaccine Development published in Nano Today reviewed 30 years of clinical trials in which mRNA was used to 'cure' infections or cancers none of them were proven successful. Imagine the surprise when Dr. Fauci (who was involved in the mRNA gene therapy process for AIDS/HIV) presented mRNA gene therapy as the "solution" to covid-19 issue.
DNA and the "GOD code"
When we talk about human DNA (human genome), some believe that our DNA/genetic code has a meaning; they believe that since we were made in the image of GOD, we carry GOD's "signature" in every cell of our body via our DNA.
mRNA gene therapy introduces mRNA into the body which then generates the production of proteins for which the mRNA is encoded. In the mRNA gene therapy for covid-19, the mRNA is encoded with the sequence for the covid-19 spike protein.
Here's where the confusion comes in. If the DNA is where the mRNA is created, but mRNA is introduced into the body from an outside source, what happens when the injected mRNA 'runs out'? The DNA, even though mRNA was injected, still produces its own mRNA to create the proteins the body needs.
On the one hand, if the injected mRNA runs out, there would need to be additional injections of mRNA to continue the production of the necessary spike protein. The global narrative calls these additional injections "boosters."
On the other hand, if the DNA could be modified to produce the mRNA itself, no more external injections of mRNA would be necessary.
Some sources are saying the mRNA gene therapy injection does NOT change your DNA whereas other sources say it DOES change your DNA.
A brief review of the literature on whether external mRNA can alter DNA was also interesting if a bit more complex. There seem to be two schools of thought as to how the mRNA gene therapy injection is able to modify the human genome. The first school of thought is called "reverse-transcribed":
In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. . . .Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.
This study lead to a discussion, in the video below, of discrimination against those who did NOT receive the mRNA gene therapy injection could be considered genetic discrimination if it changes your DNA. Dr. Simone Gold states: "This study opens the door to a new type of lawsuit."
This study, in agreement with other published investigations, demonstrates that both natural and vaccine spike protein may still be present in long-COVID patients, thus supporting the existence of a possible mechanism that causes the persistence of spike protein in the human body for much longer than predicted by early studies. According to these results, all patients with long-COVID syndrome should be analyzed for the presence of vaccinal and viral spike protein.
The outcome of the investigation revealed that the manuscript presented major flaws in the following: unclear methodology and patient recruitment, Discrepancies among data reported in the text and tables, Unreliable results, Undeclared conflict of interest.
The authors disagreed with the retraction. This makes one wonder if cancel culture is still going strong in the publication world.
Phillip Buckhaults, PhD, Professor of Cancer Molecular Genetics at the University of South Carolina, in a 2023 PowerPoint Presentation to the Senate Medical Affairs Committee on Pandemic Preparedness found:
The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is contaminated with the plasmid DNA vector that was used as the template for in vitro transcription reaction. This DNA could be the cause of some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. The DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomes of transfected cells. There is a very real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, which could cause sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. There is also a theoretical risk of future cancer, depending on the piece of DNA and site of integration.
VIDEO: Infowars, in 2021, did a show about how the mRNA gene therapy injection DOES modify your DNA:
Why do we need to know if our DNA has been modified by the mRNA gene therapy injection?
In the October 2012 Term of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) case12-398 Association for Molecular Pathology (Petitioners) v. Myriad Genetics, Inc was accepted for adjudication. This case involved Myriad Genetics, Inc. patenting of the discovery of two genes (location & sequence). The patent would give Myriad Genetics, Inc. exclusive rights to synthetically create the genes. SCOTUS held that DNA segments were NOT patentable because they were naturally occurring in nature (law of nature exception) and had simply been isolated. They did not alter or create the genetic code or sequence of the segments. Complementary DNA (cDNA), on the other hand, is created and does not occur naturally in nature. The technician creates something new when components of DNA are removed or re-sequenced creating something new.
Justice Thomas provided the court's opinion on June 13, 2013:
Scientific alteration of the genetic code presents a different inquiry, and we express no opinion about the application of 101 to such endeavors. We merely hold that genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible under 101 simply because they have been isolated from the surrounding genetic material. . . . Myriad did not create anything. . . . Scientific alteration of the genetic code presents a different inquiry, and we express no opinion about the application of101 to such endeavors. We merely hold that genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible under101 simply because they have been isolated from the surrounding genetic material.
Justice Scalia wrote an opinion in which he concurred in part and concurred in the overall judgement granted:
It suffices for me to affirm, having studied the opinions below and the expert briefs presented here, that the portion of DNA isolated from its natural state sought to be patented is identical to that portion of the DNA in its natural state; and that complementary DNA (cDNA) is a synthetic creation not normally present in nature.
Each person needs to decide for themselves, based on their own research, whether they believe the global narrative that the mRNA gene therapy injection DOES NOT modify your DNA or to believe the scientific researchers whose research is censored on most sites including their own publications; and, if one happens to 'slip through the crack' and get published, the editors are quick to denounce and remove the articles.
I remember how those in the medical profession who spoke out against the global narrative were side-lined, fired, had their medical licenses revoked, black listed, jailed, and/or placed in mental institutions. I remember how many empirical research articles were denied publication because their findings did not match the global narrative.
I also note how the "evidence" for the mRNA gene therapy injection are almost entirely "opinion" pieces written by universities, medical groups, NGO's involved in vaccine production/distribution, and journalists. Whereas the "evidence" for the mRNA gene therapy injection is almost entirely empirical "clinical research".
I am siding with the censored scientific researchers.
Whether it is the mRNA or the fragments of unrelated DNA 'contaminating' the mRNA gene therapy injection that has "caused" a change to the human genome, a change is occurring that is NOT found in nature. How this will affect individuals who had their DNA modified through receiving the mRNA gene therapy injection will need to be determined in future lawsuits. And remember, this change will be passed down to your descendants (should you be able to have any as noted by Wodarg & Yeadon in their December 1, 2020 petition to the EU, page 5).
So who will own the cDNA of your body (and your descendants should you be able to produce any)? And what will they be able to force you to do because you no longer 'own' your own body?
ANP EMERGENCY Fundraiser:
Dangerous, Derogatory, Harmful, Unreliable!
Those are some of the exact words used by Googles censors, aka 'Orwelliancontent police,' in describing many of our controversial stories.Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
