Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
Indeed, Trump inherited the global threat that is North Korea not only from his immediate predecessor, Barack Obama, but also from Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. And the truth is the country’s last three commanders in chief have all used various forms of diplomacy, strong language and even direct communication with North Korean leaders only to end up making little to no progress.
“For all the differences in the three different administrations, it’s kind of interesting to see how they all end up at the same place and maybe that will happen with these guys too,” Thomas H. Lee, professor of International Law at Fordham University and a former Naval intelligence officer, told Newsweek.
And while back on September 22nd, President Trump took great heat from liberals and the mainstream media across the country for the tweet he put out seen above, truth is truth whether people like it or not. The real world we live in isn't like some 'common core math program' where 'truth' can be manipulated to fits ones needs and purpose though many believe it is and they can.
So why would liberals embrace a madman who has threatened to wipe the US from the face of the Earth? As we read in this new story from the NY Post, liberals are actually increasing the risk of a war with North Korea and in so doing, their actions are putting Americans in even MORE danger. Directly from the NY Post story.
Where are the Democrats and their leftist echo chamber going with all this? What kind of predicament will they be in if, God forbid, war actually breaks out between America and North Korea?
Some Democrats in Congress, Newsweek reports, have been nudging legislation to block Trump from making the first strike with nuclear — or conventional, the fine print suggests — weapons.
“It’s time for Trump to just stop escalating the crisis through reckless military threats,” Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said. Markey wants us to guarantee we won’t “topple” Kim’s regime. Yet that’s how we got in this predicament in the first place.
We accepted an armistice instead of pressing for a full defeat of the Reds. Now the Norks claim to have an H-bomb.
The silence is deafening, echoing that of other liberals seeking to undermine Trump’s credibility abroad. What options will they be left with if Kim answers with war?
Back in 1940, the US Congress passed a law called the Smith Act which made it a criminal offense to advocate the violent overthrow of the government or to organize or be a member of any group or society devoted to such advocacy.
The first prosecutions under the Smith Act, of leaders of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), took place in 1941. After World War II the statute was used against the leadership of the American Communist Party (Communist Party of the United States of America; CPUSA). The convictions of the principal officers of the CPUSA (1949) were sustained—and the constitutionality of the advocacy provision of the Smith Act upheld—by the U.S. Supreme Court in Dennis v. United States (1951). In a later case, Yates v. United States (1957), the court offset that ruling somewhat by adopting a strict reading of the advocacy provision, construing “advocacy” to mean only urging that includes incitement to unlawful action.
With groups such as antifa being funded by George Soros and both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton knee deep in funding various 'resistance groups' who seek not only to take down President Trump and VP Mike Pence as stated in their own literature but take down 'America', why have such groups not yet been taken down under the Smith Act? Why are Obama, Clinton and Soros still walking in America as free people despite many years of acting against our nation, selling out America for some delusions of grandeur that they'd help create a totalitarian, luciferian global government?
The 2nd video below is the full show from Infowars that takes a look at what a war with North Korea might look like, a war that could instantly change life as we know it for everybody here in America with North Korea allowed by previous administrations to become a full-fledged nuclear power. Treason or simply fools in Washington DC? Does it really make a difference if the overall result is the same?
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear." Marcus Tullius Cicero