Pencil neck Adam Schiff turned all the innuendos, presumptions, and lies to the House Judiciary Committee to further the partisan agenda. Now that the information had been made public, we find that the "bribery," a tested poll term is not mentioned in the report.
The report also does not lay out any precise grounds for impeachment. Abuse of power is mentioned, but even as Cass Sunstien of the Obama administration declared in 2017, abuse of power is not grounds for impeachment. Ignored in the abuse of power accusation, is that even witnesses agreed that Ukraine had “bet on the wrong horse” in 2016. Nothing in the report shows any specific grounds for impeachment.
There was much hand wringing over the firing of Ambassador Yovanovitch even though even President Zelensky did not have any confidence for her. She was also deficient in any investigation of Burisma during her time as Ambassador.
Yesterday, it was being taken as fact that Gordon Sondland said that the White House meeting was conditional on investigations. Sondland later admitted that he “presumed that was the case as he had no first-hand knowledge". This was supposed to be a part of the “quid pro quo” that the progressive socialist Democrats are trying to convince the American people was impeachable even though President Zelensky felt no pressure and has said so many times in public.
The HJC is claiming “obstruction of justice” because the President affirmed the executive privilege to have members of his administration not testify. They are falsely claiming obstruction on an impeachment inquiry that had not been voted on and is partisan in the extreme.
Now they are in a hurry to impeach the President without mediating the balance of power disputes in the judicial branch. The White House has grounds that caused the non-compliance, close secret door hearings, selective leaks by Schiff and his cronies, no formal authorization, or compliance with standard impeachment protocol.
The 'progressive socialist leftists' (COMMUNISTS!) whine about the abuse of power for implementing an agreement between the U.S. and Ukraine to investigate corruption. They claim that it is an abuse of power because Job Biden was mentioned during the call.
I noticed that the Democrat's counsel used the same dodge that the media and leftists have made a talking point. He stated that President Trump asked for a favor and then directly went into talking about Biden, Hunter, and Burisma.
This leaves out the truth that the discussion about Biden was about Burisma and the corruption with the Bidens. And there was a good five minutes between the favor being asked which concerned Crowdstrike, the corrupt company that investigated the DNC hacked computer.
Let's look at the people involved in Wednesday's farce.
Norm Eisen
Norm Eisen is a former White House official under President Obama. Eisen was the founder of the left-wing Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). He served in the Obama White House as "ethics czar" and was tasked with the dissemination of visitor logs to the President. During that time, the visitor logs would not be confirmed and validated by the Obama White House. He was then assigned as Ambassador to the Czech Republic, once he returned he joined the far left Brookings Institution and served as a CNN commentator. Working for CNN, he was a faithful believer in the Russia collusion hoax.
Noah Feldman
A law professor at Harvard Unversity and a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice David Souter. His columns for Bloomberg show a rabid anti-Trumper and a progressive socialist
Pamela Karlan
A law school professor at Stanford and is currently serving on the board of the far left-leaning American Constitution Society. Karlan has been very vocal about the Democrats' impeachment inquiry.
Michael Gerhardt
A law professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law. Gerhardt has been touted as an “impeachment expert” on CNN. He was also on CNN during the Clinton impeachment proceedings arguing for the other side.
These four are using the partisan proceedings to try to explain what President Trump has done. All four have claimed that the actions of President Trump are impeachable without explicitly citing the offenses. They are not fact witnesses, but all agree that the President has done something that should lead to impeachment.
In the hearings in the intelligence committee, no one provided proof of the pressure of inappropriate on Ukraine. Even the partisan lawyer that the progressive socialists have worked with before today's hearing are basing their opinions on nothing more than assumptions and presumptions of unelected bureaucrats who disagreed with the policies of the Trump administration.
The lies are more palatable because they come from college-educated sycophants, they are adept at following the progressive socialist agenda.
ANP EMERGENCY FUNDRAISER: With non-stop censorship and 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
