While the intelligence community is busy hunting down the source of the huge WikiLeaks #Vault 7 CIA data dump and the MSM is busy trying to cover their butts on previous Trump wire tapping stories, a few new revelations have surfaced that show: 1) Obama gave the "green light" for the CIA and NSA to sabotage President Trump and his transition; 2) There was more than one investigation leading to spying on the Trump campaign before the election; 3) Obama allowed the sharing of classified information to be shared with "European" allies, despite no evidence of collusion with Russia; 4) Information was shared with the Hillary Clinton campaign; and 5) Wikileaks has revealed that the CIA had the means to plant the "fingerprints" of Russia onto the DNC and Podesta hacks.
HAMMER DROPS ON THE 'DEEP STATE'
Quite a bit of information has come out since Saturday when President Trump created a firestorm by tweeting that Barack Obama had wire-tapped him before the presidential election, so we are going to try to break it down according to each numbered point list above.
On March 6, 2017, InfoWars highlighted an RT video interview with Former CIA analyst Larry C. Johnson who asserted that according to his sources "the Obama administration worked with the NSA, the CIA and Britain’s GCHQ to disseminate information about Donald Trump that was illegally obtained via surveillance before the election. "
Had it just been Johnson, quoting unnamed sources, we would always suggest taking the information with a grain of salt until it could be confirmed, but in this case, the specific mention of the Obama admin disseminating information about Trump, is verifiable as it was reported by multiple outlets, including the NYT on March 1, 2017, to which they stated "At intelligence agencies, there was a push to process as much raw intelligence as possible into analyses, and to keep the reports at a relatively low classification level to ensure as wide a readership as possible across the government — and, in some cases, among European allies. This allowed the upload of as much intelligence as possible to Intellipedia, a secret wiki used by American analysts to share information."
At the time the information was being "disseminated" throughout the intelligence community, opening the door for thousands of people to see classified data that prior to Obama's last minute expansion of sharing said information among 17 different intelligence agencies, they would not have had clearance to see, nor "leak" to the press, the Director of National Intelligence was James Clapper, and he asserts there was "no evidence" found during his term of service (which ended on January 20, 2017) of any collusion whatsoever between the Trump campaign and Russia.
So, despite the fact that the information gathered on Trump and his campaign offered no evidence of collusion or wrong-doing, Obama deliberately made it possible in his last days in office, for said information, garnered by surveillance, which was previously under classification, to be spread far and wide, which explains the amount of "leaks" to the press.
Which brings us to the huge revelation announced on Hannity last night, where we now have confirmation that an agency under Obama did not just obtain the FISA warrant which collected the information on Trump and his campaign but that they also had a separate warrant to collect more data on the Trump campaign, according to his guest, Circa News National Security Correspondent Sara Carter.
Carter informs viewers that she has received confirmation that there was a FISA warrant issued in October 2016, which was "looking at the overall Russia hacking investigation." She goes on to reveal that when the FBI monitored a server supposedly at Trump Tower,, but it was actually located away from Trump Tower and that investigation was not part of the same investigation that included the FISA warrant,
The point being, there was not just one warrant, one case of spying on the Trump campaign, there was two. Note her reference to the information that has been revealed to date and how the basic confusion has stemmed from information from one investigation being reported on, which has been conflated with the investigation that included the FISA warrant, yet she highlights how secretive all the sources are being on the FISA investigation, the information obtained, who initiated it and the details of the warrant itself.
Listen below, Carter joins Hannity at the 5:25 minute mark.
Not one word on this explosive news in the MSM yet...... why are they covering up the fact that not only was the surveillance on the Trump campaign real, but it included two separate investigations, giving Obama officials the opportunity to mislead the public on what they knew, when they knew it and how involved Obama himself was? In other words, they can say "Obama didn't know about "this information" uncovered by the FISA warrant,"" when in reality the information came from the other investigation which he was fully aware of, or vice versa.
WHO LEAKED INFORMATION TO THE HILLARY CAMPAIGN?
Fox Insider reports on an interview with Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook on Tuesday, March 7, 2017, and the following portion caught my eye:
Mook added that the Clinton campaign was informed by the intelligence community that wiretaps of Russian agents did in fact take place.
Isn't it interesting that the FISA warrant that everyone is being so secretive about, just happened to be issued in October 2016, and Hillary Clinton, a presidential candidate for the Democrats, no longer part of the State Department, was busy tweeting on the nature of the investigation that she shouldn't have had any knowledge of?
Clinton tweeted on a Salon article on October 31, 2016, where she stated "Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert server linking the Trump Organization to a Russian-based bank."
Also on October 31, 2016, Clinton tweeted "U.S. intelligence has confirmed the Russian government is directing cyberattacks against the U.S. to influence the outcome of our election."
Did they really "confirm" it or just spread propaganda to the American public?
The Intercept published a detailed piece in December 2016, showing he basic lack of conclusive evidence the intel community and the CIA had on Russia at the time, stating the public evidence that Russia hacked the DNC was "not enough."
The attacker or attackers registered a deliberately misspelled domain name used for email phishing attacks against DNC employees, connected to an IP address associated with APT 28/Fancy Bear.
Malware found on the DNC computers was programmed to communicate with an IP address associated with APT 28/Fancy Bear.
Metadata in a file leaked by “Guccifer 2.0″ shows it was modified by a user called, in cyrillic, “Felix Edmundovich,” a reference to the founder of a Soviet-era secret police force. Another document contained cyrillic metadata indicating it had been edited on a document with Russian language settings.
Peculiarities in a conversation with “Guccifer 2.0″ that Motherboard published in June suggests he is not Romanian, as he originally claimed.
The DCLeaks.com domain was registered by a person using the same email service as the person who registered a misspelled domain used to send phishing emails to DNC employees. Some of the phishing emails were sent using Yandex, a Moscow-based webmail provider.
A bit.ly link believed to have been used by APT 28/Fancy Bear in the past was also used against Podesta.
Which brings us full circle back to the importance of the recent WikiLeaks #Vault 7 release, where the MSM has focused more on "who" leaked the information, with causal mention of the the different ways the CIA can spy on Americans, but has completely ignored the assassination aspects, and especially the fact that the documents released by WikiLeaks show that the CIA collects "collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation. With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the ‘fingerprints’ of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from."
I cover both of ANP's recent articles on the WikiLeaks revelations in the video below.
BOTTOM LINE
The fact that there were two investigations, occurring simultaneously, surveilling the Trump campaign, which has gone unreported and was exposed just last night on the Hannity show, negates every carefully worded "disingenuous" denials former Obama officials have been issuing since Trump first tweeted about the wire-tapping.
Between the WikiLeaks Vault 7 release and the newly uncovered second investigation into the Trump campaign before the elections, as well as Obama's crafty expansions of information dissemination in order to sabotage the Trump presidency, the hammer has dropped right on the "deep state's" head, and the fall out may very well be felt for months, if not years to come.
