According to this story over at the Guardian that the Drudge Report linked to on Monday, some experts are warning that liberals may soon be in for a very rude awakening and 'their worst nightmares', a successful Donald Trump presidency.
"He (President Trump) is weakened at home, barreling from one self-inflicted political firestorm to another, leaving limited room for maneuver on foreign policy.
Putin, who doesn't have to worry about the checks and balances on power constraining Trump, has established himself as a major world force, expertly playing a weak hand to reassert Russia's influence in Europe and the Middle East, while he exploits fissures in the transatlantic relationship. Any public grandstanding between the two leaders will grab the headlines."
While the relationship between Barack Obama and Putin was strangely 'cordial' at best, with even Putin warning back in July of 2016 that the world was barrelling towards World War 3 showing that relationship at worst, we'd like to believe that things will be much different between President Trump and Putin. Two leaders who appear to be 'birds of a similar feather', both who've demonstrated an entertainingly mischievous sense of humor in their dealings with the lamestream media, we hope that relationships between the two nations can move on towards much more peaceful footing in the days, weeks and months ahead for the sake of the world.
Though for the libs and msm, such peace might seem like the end of the world and their worst nightmares. As we hear in the first video below translated by the Russia Insider YouTube channel from a Russian television broadcast, "Western Civilization Will Collapse If Trump Hugs Putin At The G-20 Summit". So disturbed by the possibility of a 'budding relationship' between the two leaders, if the MSM is 'freaking-out' now because of President Trump and his tweets, what might they do if they find out that Putin and Trump get along great and can put off escalations of fighting in Syria that could have lead to a possible WW3 scenario?
While anyone paying any attention at all to the news knows that relations between Russia and the US over the past couple of years had deteriorated greatly under the Obama regime, particularly after he ordered the expulsion of 35 Russians in December of 2016 while claiming Russia was responsible for hacking the presidential election, any steps that can be taken between the two leaders of the biggest nuclear powers in the world to ward off WW3 are steps in the right direction.
As we've warned on ANP time and again, once 'mistake' in Syria could have led to an absolutely devastating nuclear war between the two superpowers and as we hear from one expert, any long-lasting moves to stop the alarming trajectory that the two nations have been on can only really be made at the presidential level.
The talks have a crucial strategic purpose, since they take place with relations between Russia and the United States in their most dangerous state since the Cold War.
Both men have an obligation to try to halt an alarming trajectory that has their nations brushing up against each other on opposite sides of Syria's civil war, at odds over NATO expansion, and maneuvering troops, ships and planes in dangerous proximity in Europe and the Baltic, with the potential for miscalculation and escalation a daily threat.
"The momentum in relations between the world's two big nuclear powers is now so negative, that it really is time to call a halt to anything that looks like further escalation or deterioration," said Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center.
"That's really only possible at the presidential level," he added.
According to this May 25th, 2017 story from the Washington Times, Barack Obama has been attempting a 'government in exile' ever since he left office and according to the msm, Obama's govt is "the real one". As the Daily Caller recently reported, only days after President Trump's meeting with South Korea's president, Obama met with Moon Jae-in for 40 minutes himself...allegedly to discuss President Trump! As their story asks, "Shadow President?"
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
While much of the left and the msm continue to live their lives within an 'alternative reality' as also heard in the 2nd video below called "Media: Obama is the "Real" President, and He's Working Behind the Scenes", we see that trust in the msm is near an all-time low and for very good reason according to the Secretary of State of Georgia.
Informed, non-partisan experts agree that manipulating a presidential election makes a good TV storyline but lacks real-world standing. State voting systems are diverse, highly scrutinized and not connected to the Internet. Web-based attacks on voter registration do not affect the vote count. The thing that matters most — your vote — is secure.
Misinformation from the media or disgruntled partisans not only fuels conspiracy theorists but also erodes the first safeguard we have in our elections — the public’s trust. Failing to respect this process with accurate reporting is a disservice to the American people.
To be candid, the most plausible and potentially effective attack on our elections is not by hacking the vote — it is through the manipulation of the American media machine. With “breaking news” that generates voter confusion, these baseless attacks and inaccurate stories enhance voter apathy and erode our confidence in the cornerstone of our democracy. That’s the real story.
What kind of damage can the fake news being peddled by outlets such as CNN, MSNBC and other MSM outlets do? As the Mises Institute clearly pointed out in this April of 2017 story, there is a very real possibility that 'fake news' could trigger World War 3. As Anti-Media recently reported, an international group of former military and diplomatic leaders is warning of an “unacceptably high” risk of global nuclear war if cooler heads don’t prevail. The final video below takes a look at this report.
In an 11-page report from the Nuclear Crisis Group (NCG) — a subcommittee of Global Zero, an organization that supports the total abolition of nuclear weapons — the former officials make recommendations to governments on ways to de-escalate tensions around the world.
On Russia, NCG again said diplomacy is the answer. The group recommended that the “United States, Russia and NATO states commit not to issue public threats of nuclear first use” and “rapidly launch US-Russia strategic stability talks focusing on potential dangers flowing from existing and potential nuclear deployments, doctrines and modernization programs.”
A top nuclear expert has warned that virtually everybody in the world would die if World War 3 broke out as a result of a confrontation between the United States and Russia.
Greg Mello, secretary and executive director of the Los Alamos Study Group, was asked how many people would die on the first day of a nuclear war. “Everybody in the world would die. Some people in the southern hemisphere might survive, but probably not even them, he responded.
Noting that the whole system was “very fragile,” Mello said that, “Even a couple of nuclear weapons could end the United States as a government and an economy,” destroying the financial markets and the Internet.
Even if nuclear exchanges were limited, with just ICBM silos and airfields being targeted, the fallout would wipe out the entire U.S. Midwest, including big cities like Chicago, according to Mello.
Nuclear power plants would also meltdown, unleashing a wave of Fukushima-style disasters across the country, he added.