The Magnetron tube – that is the primary operating source of the microwaves inside your “radar range” or microwave oven. Usually operating at 4.1Kv (Kilovolts, or 4,100 volts) with varying output current levels depending on the “wattage” yours is rated at. Most seem to be in the 600 to 1200 watt range, with some higher power and some lower power models available. A few years ago there seemed to be a lot of talk about how safe they are, and even many writers saying they should not be in your homes, but why? The FDA says that “Microwave radiation can heat body tissue the same way it heats food. Exposure to high levels of microwaves can cause a painful burn. Two areas of the body, the eyes and the testes, are particularly vulnerable to RF heating because there is relatively little blood flow in them to carry away excess heat. ….Most injuries related to microwave ovens are the result of heat-related burns from hot containers, overheated foods, or exploding liquids. Most injuries are not radiation-related. That said, there have been very rare instances of radiation injury due to unusual circumstances or improper servicing. In general, microwave oven radiation injuries are caused by exposure to large amounts of microwave radiation leaking through openings such as gaps in the microwave oven seals” with some special warnings about heart pacemakers in the early ovens. Not much of a problem according to our government with regulations saying they cannot put out more than 5 milliwatts (or 0.005 watts) per square centimeter. But microwave ovens still present a powerful source of microwave radiation even though it is mostly shielded from us so you need not worry too hard about cooking your brain anytime soon.
Magnatron tube for a microwave
EMF – Electric and Magnetic Field – The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has an easy to understand informative overview of what that term means. Basically, any operating electric system has some electric and magnetic forces surrounding it just from the electrical energy entering because an electric field is generated along with its corresponding magnetic field that is at right angles to the electric field. I do not want to go too far into the details but suffice it to say any electric system has EMF radiation associated to some degree or the other; even a power cord has both an electrical and magnetic field when energized. Generally EMF is grouped into two primary categories; Non-ionizing and ionizing primarily based on its frequency. We won’t bother with the ionizing type here because that is in the very high frequency ranges of sunlight, x-rays, gamma rays and so forth; but radio waves, microwaves, cellphones, the household 60 cycle AC in your home, computers, wi-fi and the like are non-ionizing EMF radiation.
ANP FUNDRAISER: Due to renewed censorship by 'big tech' upon ANP articles, we'll be running a fundraising drive until we catch up on expenses. We also want to thank everybody who has donated to ANP over the years. With donations and ad revenue all that keep ANP online, if you're able, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America's future at this absolutely critical time in US history. During a time of systematic, 'big tech' censorship and widespread institutional corruption, truth-seeking media and alternative views are crucial, and EVERY little bit helps more than you could know!)
Note in the second video below how much stronger the EMF is in proximity to a 5G cell tower, and then compared to the output of a 5G cellphone. We are surrounded, we are bathed deeply in RF radiation from many sources. The video shows the immediate strengths, but does not allow for accumulated radiation levels or effects. That is the great error in his assuming they are not dangerous. Microwave ovens cook not just by the immediate power output but by the continuous accumulating energy imparted to the food inside, and airline crews are given exposure levels on a time basis to indicate harmful radiation just as nuclear power station workers are. That is why people that are always on their cellphone have a far higher incidences of brain cancers. While the government states that there is no difference worthy of note, we have all witnessed especially lately how little we can trust them. Rather, let us look inside the industry studies for a more pragmatic observation and keep in mind the nature of prolonged exposures have. Electromagnetic Radiation Safety on their website states in an article titles “Brain Tumor Rates Are Rising in the US: The Role of Cell Phone & Cordless Phone Use” that Gliooma, the most common malignant brain tumor, has increased most noticeably in the 20-29 year age group; and that Meningioma, the most common form of non-malignant brain cancer, has increased considerably as well in most age groups with higher usage corresponding to higher cancer rates. And this is all before the new 5G cellphone networks are considered.
The FCC wants amateur radio operators to evaluate the RF (Radio Frequency) exposure rate their stations have, and that is not because there is no risk from poorly maintained equipment or poor station design and operation. It is there because there is an actual risk factor of RF exposure, although in most cases very little risk. The point is that it exists and it is proximity to the source that determines the radiation levels you are subject to. See also the OSHA page on Radio Frequencies and microwave radiation.
EMF in the RF range has been used as weaponry in many forms, including microwave emissions to disorient US embassy workers, energy beams to disrupt ordinance, very high powered units to destroy communications and other systems and much more. As used in the much higher frequencies of light in a collated beam, lasers are very deadly. “EMF exposure levels are monitored and enforced at the global, national, and local levels in a varied patchwork of procedures by multiple organizations, depending on where you live….. ICNIRP is a non-governmental organization recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO)…. The ICNERP guidelines currently specify that people at work shouldn’t be exposed to current electric densities in the body’s head, neck and trunk of greater than 10 mA m-2 (the “basic restriction”)…..A lower limit of 2 mA m-2 is given for the general population to account for children and people who may be more sensitive” is how Healthline covers this in their recent article wondering if you should be worried about EMF levels. Please note that the US standard of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter is in between the workplace and the general population limits of the above if you consider that 1 milliwatt equals one milliamp at a 1 volt rating. “A milliampere is one 1/1000th of an ampere. It’s the level above which electric and magnetic fields have on bodily tissue and cognitive brain function” according to the NIH study that this information was taken from while the EPA “takes a difference stance on low levels of EMF radiation. The EPA states in its EMF Guidelines that it neither recommends nor imposes limits on low-level EMFs because there’s no scientific evidence that low levels of electromagnetic radiation damage human health.” So it would seem that the Feds cannot get any consensus on the matter, which is not a surprise.
The NIH (National Institute of Health) published a study saying that “Microwave frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produce widespread neuropsychiatric effects including depression” and continued on saying “microwave/lower frequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) act via voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) activation. Calcium channel blockers block EMF effects and several types of additional evidence confirm this mechanism. Low intensity microwave EMFs have been proposed to produce neuropsychiatric effects, sometimes called microwave syndrome, and the focus of this review is whether these are indeed well documented and consistent with the known mechanism(s) of action of such EMFs. VGCCs occur in very high densities throughout the nervous system and have near universal roles in release of neurotransmitters and neuroendocrine hormones. Soviet and Western literature shows that much of the impact of non-thermal microwave exposures in experimental animals occurs in the brain and peripheral nervous system, such that nervous system histology and function show diverse and substantial changes.” This is the cause of the Embassy personnel that have had such a difficult time while in our embassies around the globe. This is a weapon of war they are being impacted by. “…the mechanism of action of microwave EMFs, the role of the VGCCs in the brain, the impact of non-thermal EMFs on the brain, extensive epidemiological studies performed over the past 50 years, and five criteria testing for causality, all collectively show that various non-thermal microwave EMF exposures produce diverse neuropsychiatric effects.”
As 5G frequency spectrum ranges from about 700 Mhz (700 Mega Hertz) up to 100 GHz (Giga Hertz) we need to look at specific carriers usage to be accurate, but what is needful at the moment is that they are all in Ultra High (UHF) through microwave frequencies and that means a number of things important to know. Specifically, that they are line of sight only, that the energy dissipates quickly it the atmosphere and even quicker through any blockages such as tree leaves, building walls, and so forth. Higher frequencies equal more sensitivity to the effects of the radiation as well as closer distances from the radiating elements. And that means a much higher propensity to do physical damage to our bodies. The inverse square law states that the magnitude of one’s exposure to RF or EMF radiation drops proportional to the square of one’s distance from the source. That is illustrated nicely in the video below showing the effects of radiation leaking from microwave ovens, the first video below. That is why you need to be fairly close to your cellphone (and remember the accumulative effects too) to have the possibility (or should that be probability) of cellular damage from the radiation it emits. It appears that the higher the frequency and the higher power required to make those higher frequencies work properly is the largest factor in the 5G networks being so dangerous.
This also means that the distance you are from any RF EMF is the key to your safety. “If you want to be completely safe from EMF radiation, distance is the only sure-fire way. The only problem with that is that it is virtually impossible to get away from all EMF emissions today unless you live at the North Pole with no cell phone and no electricity. The wise solution is to know where your sources are and reduce all levels in your daily environment to safe levels.” And since that is not feasible, we must do what we can to maintain our distance from strong sources of 5G.
But there may be a slim glimmer of hope, but I will not put any funds betting on it actually amounting to much. Natural News commented on a story by The Epoch Times and said “…it has been known for quite some time that cellular radiation of all kinds is dangerous to wildlife as well as to people. And yet the federal government has turned a blind eye to the science and instead promoted the interests of Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile.
“We have more than enough research to trigger new regulatory action to protect wildlife,” a spokesperson from EHT is further quoted as saying.
“The FCC should have done a full review of the environmental impact of 5G network deployment before streamlining hundreds of thousands of 5G cell towers across the nation.” They also quote CNN in this snippet; “With 5G coming to neighborhoods across the country, the levels of wireless radiation will significantly increase,” warns Davis, who believes that the time is now to act.
“We do not have the luxury of time to continue to debate this issue with the wireless industry. Adults, children, pets, wildlife, and our environment are all vulnerable.”
True enough, and we haven’t even broached the ideas of how it reacts to the impurities and systems imbedded in the Covid murder weapon, the vax commonly known as the Kill Shot. There has been much written on it, but I am as of yet not satisfied with the science involved so I will leave it at this point for a future update.
Perhaps in a very dark manner we may have some benefits to our health with a hard grid down scenario, but the actual facts of it would kill off perhaps 90 to 95% of our population in the long run. Not a good trade, but seemingly in our future regardless. Until then, reducing our exposure to RF fields and other types of EMF would seem a good choice to make (as I sit in front of my computer with three monitors and ham radio equipment on the desk with Wi-Fi and the like all going on). Especially with exposure to 5G and it’s mostly unknown but predicted harsh future effects on our bio-systems.
The Effects of Radiation Leaking from Microwave Ovens
Is the 5G Radiation From Your Phone Killing You? Using GQ EMF-390 EMF Meter
ANP FUNDRAISER: With non-stop censorship and 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card: