Although President Trump caused a near mainstream media meltdown with the announcement of the winners of 2017's 'fake news awards' resulted in CNN, ABC, the NY Times, the Washington Post, Newsweek and Time taking home well-deserved awards for lying to the American people, it's time to take a look at the bullet America dodged with the election of President Trump into office. As we learn in a new story from Newsweek, even though Hillary sits at home, their bizarre story claims Hillary could still become president as reported in more detail below. We also take another look at the ongoing war upon independent media that's just claimed another victim.
With recent moves by French President Emmanuel Macron to ban the spread of 'fake news' being akin to one of the greatest tools of dictators, WHO gets to decide if news is 'fake', the dictator slaughtering his people? Evidence shows should Hillary Clinton had won in November of 2016, it's likely that many of us would now be sitting in her Soviet-style gulags called 'FEMA camps'.
Nearly a year after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, a Harvard University professor says 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton could still become commander in chief.
Lawrence Lessig, the Roy L. Furman professor of law and leadership at Harvard Law School, penned an essay for Medium in October outlining a series of hypothetical scenarios that could take place should the ongoing probe find that the Trump campaign actually conspired with Russia to influence the results of the election.
On Wednesday, Lessig told Newsweek this scenario was still a possibility.
“This is one way it could happen,” Lessig said. “But that’s very different from saying I think it will happen, or should happen, or [that] the evidence is there for it to happen.”
We should all remember that prior to the election of President Trump, Hillary Clinton's own deputy communications director Christina Reynolds stated the following in a fundraising email that leads us to ask, who are the real anti-free-speech fascists?
The fundraising email asserted that right-wing site Breitbart News has no “right to exist,” and heavily suggested that as president, Clinton will make sure it is shut down entirely.
“We’ve had a conservative media in this country for a while,” the email signed by deputy communications director Christina Reynolds read. “I don’t always like what they have to say, but I respect their role and their right to exist.”
In context, her statement is intended to say that Breitbart does not have the same right.
“Breitbart is something different,” she says. “They make Fox News look like a Democratic Party pamphlet. They’re a different breed altogether — not just conservative but radical, bigoted, anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic conspiracy peddlers who never have been and never should be anywhere near the levers of power in this country.”
To ensure there was no mistaking the meaning behind the email, Reynolds reportedly stated that one of the goals of the Clinton administration will be to ensure that Breitbart is destroyed.
As Infowars also reported back on August 21st of 2016, then 'Presidential hopeful' Hillary Clinton’s campaign suggested in a recent fundraising email that the website Breitbart News has no “right to exist” and that Clinton would shut it down if elected, putting all alternative news in danger.
The PV journalist then asked, “So Twitter doesn’t necessarily offer free speech around the world?”
“No,” Miranda said.
And while globalists and many on the left continue to compare President Trump to Adolf Hitler, should we be surprised that many of those same people are seemingly backing Kim Jong Un and North Korea against President Trump and America?
Why are countries such as Germany, Slovakia, Surinam, the Czech Republic, Ghana and Latvia ranked AHEAD of the US in press freedom? Any ranking at all less than #1 shows we have long been moving towards tyranny and with the mainstream media now being outed as completely in the globalists/Hillary Clinton camp, is there any wonder that the US was so poorly ranked?
As we've previously reported on ANP, much of the censorship that we're witnessing now from not only big tech but nation states can be tied directly to the criticism of Islam. As the Gatestone Institute reported back in March of 2017, Germany's 'jihad on the freedom of speech' has followed a pattern in Europe with German police so busy raiding homes across the country and targeting citizens who write "hateful" or "offensive" Facebook postings that they don't have to capture the Islamic terrorists who are slaughtering people.
And meanwhile, mosques in Germany are openly preaching anti-Semitism and ISIS-style jihadism.
As this January 13th story from Activist Post reports, the so-called 'fight against fake news' is really just a back-door trick to enact censorship and as we've previously reported on ANP, with the independent news media largely backing President Donald Trump while the MSM ran nearly 90% of their stories against him, the globalists would love to take down the independent, pro-Trump media prior to the 2020 election.
As the Toledo Blade reported back in October 2017, tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Twitter should not be trusted with protecting free expression with news coming out since the election proving they play partisan politics and damn the truth.
While not a fan of Ted Cruz as a presidential candidate against President Trump, he's a bulldog in Congress and as we see in the final video below, he rips the tech giants over their clear and obvious censorship of Conservatives.
As we hear in the first video below from Reason TV, so-called 'fake news' is not a reason to regulate the internet, nor is truth a reason for the crackdown on the freedom of speech we're now witnessing across Europe and Canada.
In closing, just imagine the 'Russia probe' finding (fake) evidence of Trump collusion with Russia that allows them to run this administration out of office while bringing Hillary in as the Newsweek story dreams. The stuff of nightmares? With Hillary the sole arbiter of what is real news and what is fake news, 'the truth' would forever be unknown and history soon thereafter long forgotten.