Match Exact Phrase    

Whatfinger: Frontpage For Conservative News Founded By Veterans

"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"

Share This


September 27, 2015

The Final Betrayal - Something Huge Just Happened But Is It Too Late? Say Goodbye To America


By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

Hard-core conservatives are patting themselves on the back for "ousting" Speaker of the House John Boehner, who recented decided to resign from his position at the end of October, but did this big win for conservatives come too late? Will one of Boehner's last acts, last deals, last capitulation...... seal our fate?

On Saturday Stefan Stanford highlighted  a number of events where the "elite" appear to have had very public meltdowns, one of which was John Boehner's, but recent reports show that Boehner may have cut a backroom deal with Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, to "fund the Obama administration for the rest of its tenure, to fund Obamacare, to fund executive amnesty, to fund Planned Parenthood, to fund implementation of this Iran deal," in what is being referred to as "the final betrayal."

Boehner resigned because he knew that after he cut that deal, conservatives in his own party would be so furious with him that it would make challenges to his Speakership a certainty, sources say. Even if he survived those challenges, his remaining year and three months in office would be contentious and personally uncomfortable for him.

The evidence of the chaos such a deal would cause, not just for Boehner, but for the GOP as a whole, can be seen in articles such as the one from the Associated Press on september 26, 2015, titled "CONSERVATIVES TO 2016 GOP FIELD: DEFY US AT YOUR OWN PERIL," where the media outlet starts off with "The Republican Party's conservative wing, pumped up by House Speaker John Boehner's stepping down, is warning the 2016 presidential candidates that defying its wishes will come at their peril."

GOP presidential candidate Ben Carson called the Boehner resignation a warning to moderates and they had better watch their backs. The issue of Boehner starts at the 1:18 minute mark, where Carson also addresses the possibility of the rumored deal Boehner will cut and what it means.

(Article continues after the video clip)

While many consider the Boehner resignation as just "politics" as well as the deal with Iran, Planned Parenthood funding and Obamacare, the  "executive amnesty," capitulation may just be the one item that seals the fate of America.


In an April 2015 One News Now article, Obama's November 21, 2014 Presidential Memorandum is highlighted where "Obama declared his strategy to push through his executive order that would grant amnesty to more than five-million illegal immigrants and child migrants. In order to accommodate them, he put together the task force. In addition, the Obama administration is accepting 70,000 foreign refugees annually from Somalia, Iraq, Syria, Burma, Bhutan and other terrorist-harboring Islamic nations."

According to the New York Times, that number has now been increased to accepting 100,000 worldwide refugees each year by 2017.

We already know there is at least 190 US locations that were secretly selected to accept these "refugees," ( List of locations embedded in the linked article) as we know that ISIS terrorists and others have infiltrated the refugees population in order to seed themselves across the west. 

Before that list of 190 locations was published in April 2015, we were warned by a whistleblower who was on a White House conference call that specific mention of teaching illegals how to "navigate," not assimilate, and that certain communities would be designated "receiving communities," which would of course have taxpayer funds pumped into them, then would "morph into emerging immigrant communities."

Via that ANP article from March 2015:

Payne goes on to reveal that immigrants were described as "seedlings" that needed fertile soil in order to grow as she asserts they would continue to grow until they "took over the host," and came out of the shadows as natural born and legal citizens were pushed into the shadows.

For those that deny that we are seeing the implementation by Obama, of a long-term plan to destroy America and replace the U.S. constitution with Sharia,  and call those that point it out "conspiracy theorists," all one has to do is research their previously stated goals.

Via  WND, titled "Poll: Most U.S. Muslims Would Trade Constitution For Sharia":

According to a local newspaper report, Omar Ahmad, a founder of CAIR, told a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.

The reporter paraphrased Ahmad saying, “The Quran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”


On April 4, 1993, Hooper told a reporter for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”

Hooper appeared on Michael Medved’s radio show in October 2003 and stated: “If Muslims ever become a majority in the United States, it would be safe to assume that they would want to replace the U.S. Constitution with Islamic law, as most Muslims believe that God’s law is superior to man-made law.”


51 percent of U.S. Muslims prefer Shariah

There are now an estimated 3 million Muslims residing in the United States as citizens or with permanent legal status, and more than 250,000 new Muslim residents enter the U.S. per year as refugees, on work visas and student-based visas, according to the Center for Immigration Studies.

A poll commissioned in May 2015 by the Center for Security Policy showed that 51 percent of American Muslims preferred that they should have their own Shariah courts outside of the legal system ruled by the U.S. Constitution. And nearly a quarter believed the use of violent jihad was justified in establishing Shariah.

"That would translate into roughly 300,000 Muslims living in the United States who believe that Shariah is 'The Muslim God Allah's law that Muslims must follow and impose worldwide by Jihad,'" writes Frank Gaffney Jr., president of the Center for Security Policy.

Ben Carson recently came under attack for saying he could not support a Muslim as president after he was asked if a president's faith should matter. Carson replied "I guess it depends on what that faith is. It its inconsistent with the values and principles of America, then of course it should matter, but if it fits within the realm of America and consistent with the Constitution, no problem." 

Carson was then asked if Islam is consistent with the Constitution and he responded by saying "No, I don't, I do not. I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that." (Video of that exchange below the article.) 


The answer to that question is a resounding NO! 

Many have addressed this issue, an excellent example of the differences can be found here, with an item by item listing, as well as a PDF via the Center for Security Policy which shows that the First, Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments would be null and void under Sharia Law.

If this was not a real concern, then why has there been the need in more than two dozen U.S. states to consider measures intended to restrict judges from consulting sharia law?  Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, Tennessee, North Carolina and Alabama have "banned sharia" i.e. passed foreign law bans. In 2010 and 2011 more than two dozen states "considered measures to restrict judges from consulting Shariah, or foreign and religious laws more generally". As of 2013 all but 16 states have considered such a law. (Source)



For those unaware, Sharia compliancy is already being implemented in certain areas.... as evidenced by Seattle, via WND:

Seattle’s Democrat Mayor Ed Murray was so concerned that Muslims and other residents weren’t buying enough homes in his city that he had a committee investigate how that could be rectified.

One of the committee’s recommendations: Banks need to offer “Shariah-compliant” mortgage loans for Seattle’s growing Muslim community.

Muslims are forbidden by their religious law, Shariah, from paying interest on loans so they must be offered loans structured in such a way that interest is not part of the package.

The 28-member committee recommended the city convene lenders and community leaders to explore options for increasing access to Shariah-compliant loans, the Puget Sound Business Journal reported.

“We will work to develop new tools for Muslims who are prevented from using conventional mortgage products due to their religious beliefs,” said Murray, at a recent press conference.

More and more lenders are offering Shariah-compliant financing, according to a USA Today report,” the Journal reports. “The sector has grown to more than $1.6 trillion in assets worldwide over the past three decades, and analysts see potential for continued growth as the number of Muslims in the United States and Europe grows.”


If John Boehner has cut a backroom deal with Pelosi, funding executive amnesty, then it would indeed be the "final betrayal" against this nation and the populace..... we can all say goodbye to the U.S. Constitution and all the rights guaranteed to us within it and hello to Sharia Law.


WordPress Website design by Innovative Solutions Group - Helena, MT
comments powered by Disqus

Web Design by Innovative Solutions Group