1: knowledge about or study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments and observation
2: a particular area of scientific study (such as biology, physics, or chemistry) : a particular branch of science
3: a subject that is formally studied in a college, university, etc.
This definition of the word “Science” is as given in the Merriam Webster dictionary, and is further defined by their “Full Definition” as:
1: the state of knowing:knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
4: a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws
I would like to draw attention to the differences in the definitions given above so we can consider the inherent problems better. The word “reconcile” (in addition to the meaning “to cause people or groups to become friendly again after an argument or disagreement” ) includes the definition of “ to find a way of making (two different ideas, facts, etc.) exist or be true at the same time”. I am sorry, but that is in conflict with the actual definition of “Science” as the METHOD of finding out the truth of any given subject as given in the additional definition or the results from using that method;
3a: knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method
b: such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena.
The Scientific Method is defined as“principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses”and does NOT include pretend facts, UNPROVEN assumptions, nor political views promulgated as “fact” where it is most definitely proven otherwise or assumedotherwise. All of my Science classes whether from K-12 or higher education were described as “hard science”. In other words, only incorporating what has been learned and proven by repeated analysis of experiments that show consistent results and pass the laws of science or physics or whatever discipline is involved. Science is based on developing a theory to explain a given set of circumstances, creating tests to prove or disprove that theorem, and then revising that theory to fit the discovered truths. The Science Council gives an excellent definition when they state“Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social world following a systematic methodology based on evidence”.
(ANP FUNDRAISER: Due to renewed censorship by 'big tech' upon ANP articles, we'll be running a fundraising drive until we catch up on expenses. We also want to thank everybody who has donated to ANP over the years. With donations and ad revenue all that keep ANP online, if you're able, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America's future at this absolutely critical time in US history. During a time of systematic, 'big tech' censorship and widespread institutional corruption, truth-seeking media and alternative views are crucial, and EVERY little bit helps more than you could know!)
As of late it seems the modern definition is that “science” is anything that confirms one set of political views and disparages all else. It is “science” that says CO2 is deadly and kills people and destroys life on this planet while they ignore the FACT that CO2 is necessary for life itself. We are a Carbon based life system and CO2 is part and parcel of that life cycle. Flora takes in CO2 and expels O2 while fauna takes in O2 and expels CO2. There are so many other components involved but we will limit our example to that given for our purposes today. Please note the addition of “social world” to the above definition. They assume that whatever “social” system used must be some sort of “science” and not just a construct of human thought and experience. I disagree, but so be it.
There are actually two different ways to describe any science discovery. The first is scientific LAW and the second is scientific THEORY. Do not confuse them, they are very different. A Theory can only become a law when it ALWAYS follows any proper experiment, it never fails. ALL ELSE are theories, NOT laws as so many “theories” are described as being. As an example, let’s take the Three Laws of Thermodynamics. They ALWAYS result in proper results when done with accurate and proper tests. So much so that many other sciences or fields of study can use them as a firm basis to theorize with. Actually, those laws can be transposed into other disciplines easily enough, for instance Creation is PROVEN by the Entropy law that states order is never random and that order MUST become disorder. Entropy is the amount of disorder in any given system; it always increases and never decreases. That means that Evolution is a false theory because it defies the LAW of Entropy, the Second Law of Thermodynamics. That also means we were CREATED as a higher life form. Indeed, life itself MUST be created; it cannot just appear because of those PROVEN laws.
So many scientists demand that cannot be the case because their view of evolution does not allow for any other LAWS to be incorporated, or that laws governing heat cannot be used to describe changes in biology. That is, of course, pure bull exhaust. NEVER has a lower form of life been found to miraculously change into a higher form of life. However, changes are formed within a given level of life, such as the seemingly inexhaustible variations in forms of canines from the naturally occurring forms; think wolves into hounds as an example. Never has random choice spontaneously formed computer chips out of the sand on your local beach, never has a beautiful woman formed herself out of a glob of clay. Creation is the ONLY allowable answer to describe life let alone the expanse of the Heavens.
We are constantly bombarded with the admonition that we MUST believe the “science” on any given subject by the mainstream medias, by government, by corporations and by education related systems and that all they teach is based on “science” even though there are immense contradictions amongst all of these groups as to what their “science” really means or entails proving they are working from varied fallible theories at best. We must trust in science because the supposedly more learned among them is far greater in intelligence and knowledge than we of the plebian classes that often have far superior educational backgrounds and far more rational minds. Just because most persons are not in the currently more popular or more powerful castes does NOT mean they are stupid or uneducated. Quite the contrary actually, we tend to be MORE intelligent because we do not fall for every little idea that forces its way into the official narrative of any given moment as evidenced by the constantly changing “science” and opinions on that supposed knowledge base that the elites embody to further their own schemes for their plenary fetishes.
As for me, my faith resides with the Creator, and not the creation…
The vast number of times we are told to believe in, to have faith in the sciences because they tell us that it is better to have a shot that actually kills us in order to stay safe, to believe that artificial intelligence will save us because the computers are so much smarter than we are, to give religious honor to those who study how to build a new and perfect world order, to avoid any discomfort by following the advice of those paid by major corporations to goad us into something that is not good and not correct, to “follow the science” even though it is most definitely NOT the science, to believe in anything that the ‘superior’ caste mandates we believe in, is as ANTI science as it is ANTI God.
Let’s take a look at one instance of “science” negating actual science in the name of Social Justice.
A recent article in Breitbart headlines with “Scientist’s Talk Canceled Because Experts Should Reflect Diversity: ‘Citational Justice’ Necessary” with the explanation that “ geophysicist and professor at the University of Chicago who was scheduled to talk about climate change at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) was blocked from speaking after faculty members and graduate students protested. The angry response was not because of the content of his proposed speech but because Dorian Abbot, who is white, has written in the past about his belief that while diverse selection pools are a good thing, the best person should win the prize based not on race but on merit.
Abbot’s past writings put him at odds with popular ideologies of leftists, like affirmation action and programs to promote diversity. “
““M.I.T. has behaved disgracefully in capitulating to a politically motivated campaign,” George said. “This is part of a larger trend of the politicization of science.”
“I truly did not know what to say,” Abbot said in an interview with the Times. “We’re not going to do the best science we can if we are constrained ideologically.””
““There is no question that these controversies will have a negative impact on my scientific career,” he said. “But I don’t want to live in a country where instead of discussing something difficult we go and silence debate.””
That is the modern conditions of an open debate, of discourse leading to greater scientific truths, of gaining knowledge and of civil behavior among peers or students? Really? This can only be looked on as the beginning of a new dark age, of suppression of truth, of the death of actual science.
We are constantly fed pure lies as we are told that the vax is safe, that science says we must social distance, that masks can save us, that the government will not lie to us, that government controlled science is our new god.
Another example might be the article titled “Modern Psychiatry is Demonic” wherein they state that“Western medicine is tightly controlled by corporations and compassionless doctors who follow the dictates of Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, we are arriving at a point in history where, if you don’t have access to medical care, your life span may increase, such as I imagine the case in the days when witch doctors practiced trepanation. Within this murderous beast of death care is psychiatry, the most evil component within a greater evil. From my research and firsthand experience, psychiatry is a vehicle of Satan to destroy minds, sterilize women, and ultimately condemn souls to hell.
The secular world makes people ill by denying the presence of God, and then the secular world gives the solution of psychiatry and its obsession of prescribing anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs which fleece billions of dollars from patients via recurring monthly paymentsfor those who become dependent on them and simply cannot quit.”
“The whole field of psychiatry is backward rationalization. They study patients with mental illness, theorize on the biochemical state of their brains, and then shovel them with ultra-addictive drugs to make their brains appear similar to those without mental illness, but this is merely studying the effect of a disorder and then declaring it to be the cause. Their ultimate conclusion is that brain imbalance causes brain imbalance.”
This is NOT science, it is Satanic Evil disguised as the science. It is a method of creating its own discipline of study for the sake of wealth and power, having no basis in actual science because it is not result of actual use of the scientific method. It is an aberration of it that hides the real cause and effect of Human emotion and response to stress. Personally I have a poor view of psychiatry because everyone I know that went into it was in dire need of a psychiatrist and I assumed they went in to self diagnose. I also love the way the author of that article describes possibly the greatest current threat to Human sanity with this comment – “Psychiatrists are the mad scientists of our times, which is a slight compliment to them because at least they are not the butchers of our times like those performing abortions or transgender surgeries as heralded by Johns Hopkins University, but both sets of doctors, the doctor of medicine who damages the brain and the doctor of surgery who mutilates the body, need each other to achieve Satan’s will, because the women who commit abortions and the men who chop off their penises need the psychiatrist to alleviate the inevitable pain that results from the hands of Satan’s butcher, not just the mental and emotional pain but the pain of a soul crying out in need of God.”
This would appear to be the time to go into the farce of Covid, but the amount of fake science and propaganda and evil mandates are anything but science. It cannot even rise from the definition of a scientific theory because it is so far from anything but pure fantasy playing dress up as propaganda. There is so much false information being splattered about that it is almost impossible to find any basis in fact or real science in the whole mess. It is political theater at its best and Satanic disorder at its worst. It really is in fact the operation of the so-called Illuminati, the Lucifarians, the Church of Satan implementing the evil ones plans for the final showdown with our Creator. It is NOT science, it has become anti-science and in an anti-Christ format.
An interesting discussion of the evil behind covid.
As an Amazon Associate ANP earns from qualifying purchases
ANP FUNDRAISER: With non-stop censorship and 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card: