Why would Hillary want to get us into a war with Russia that could quickly lead to the deaths of tens of millions of Americans?
Imagine waking up one morning to a 'President Hillary Clinton' addressing the nation, informing us that we will be going to war with Russia for hacking into our computer systems, (a hack that exposed she had put Americans lives and our national security in danger) so that she won't have to deal with the fact she put American lives and our national security in danger.
Rather than admitting that she had done something horrible that had led to America's national security being compromised and the deaths of innocent human beings around the planet, Hillary decides that the only way she'll possibly get out of the mess she had caused would be by taking on another sovereign nation, a nation with "a fully locked and loaded military, with tanks, ships and a competent quarterback directing the action."
As we have reported previously on ANP, according to Russian insiders living here in America, the very last thing that Russia wants to do is to go to war with America because they know what such a war would mean. However, as we learn in the 2nd video below from the cyber hackers 'Anonymous', the world is closing in upon that total disaster.
We were warned that a US attack upon Russia would very quickly lead to an America with NO electrical grid, NO banking system, NO public transportation system, NO public utilities, NO internet, NO interstate highway system, NO air transportation, and NO gas/oil pipelines/energy supplies, leading us to ask, would it be worth it to the American people for Hitlery to go to war with Russia if the result was an America in total ruins within days or hours?
As Russian insider Dmitry Orlov also tells us, a US attack upon Russia would also likely lead to the entire landmass of the US covered by a 'layer of radioactive ash' and our military throughout the globe no longer being resupplied. Simply stated, a Hillary Clinton attack upon Russia would eventually lead to the end of America and the deaths of a huge portion of the US population. Knowing that a 'reckless' Hillary could trigger a horrifying sequence of events that lead to our total annihilation we have to ask, should Hillary Clinton be anywhere near DC should tragedy strike anywhere on this planet? From Orlov:
We tell you this not to be alarmist, but because, based on everything we know, we are ourselves alarmed. If attacked, Russia will not back down; she will retaliate, and she will utterly annihilate the United States.
The US leadership has done everything it could to push the situation to the brink of disaster. First, its anti-Russian policies have convinced the Russian leadership that making concessions or negotiating with the West is futile. It has become apparent that the West will always support any individual, movement or government that is anti-Russian, be it tax-cheating Russian oligarchs, convicted Ukrainian war criminals, Saudi-supported Wahhabi terrorists in Chechnya or cathedral-desecrating punks in Moscow.
Now that NATO, in violation of its previous promises, has expanded right up to the Russian border, with US forces deployed in the Baltic states, within artillery range of St. Petersburg, Russia’s second-largest city, the Russians have nowhere left to retreat. They will not attack; nor will they back down or surrender. The Russian leadership enjoys over 80% of popular support; the remaining 20% seems to feel that it is being too soft in opposing Western encroachment. But Russia will retaliate, and a provocation or a simple mistake could trigger a sequence of events that will end with millions of Americans dead and the US in ruins.
The new story over at Sputnik News tells us about an alarming rise of US/NATO bio-defense labs on Russia's borders that have been researching biological weapons, proving to Russia that they 'are not entirely peaceful'. As the map we see above so sarcastically asks, why would Russia put their country SO CLOSE to NATO's military bases? The more important question should be, why do the US and NATO continue to provoke Russia rather than cooperate with them against our common enemies?
“Today, I am here to talk about three crucial words that should be at the center of our foreign policy: Peace Through Strength,” Trump opened his remarks by saying.
Trump said that America can and should achieve a “stable, peaceful world with less conflict and more common ground” with his proposals of a “new foreign policy focused on advancing America’s core national interests, promoting regional stability, and producing an easing of tensions in the world.”
“This will require rethinking the failed policies of the past,” Trump said. “We can make new friends, rebuild old alliances, and bring new allies into the fold.”
Trump noted how national security leaders are rallying around his campaign, and against the campaign of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton, specifically citing the Tuesday letter from 88 retired U.S. generals and admirals endorsing him for president.
He noted these leaders “know both how to win – and how to avoid the endless wars we are caught in now” and called for a new vision of “realism” in the Middle East.
“In a Trump Administration, our actions in the Middle East will be tempered by realism,” Trump said. “The current strategy of toppling regimes, (Hillary's foreign policy) with no plan for what to do the day after, only produces power vacuums that are filled by terrorists. Gradual reform, not sudden and radical change, should be our guiding objective in that region.”
Trump called for alliances with any nation that wants to join the United States in “destroying” the Islamic State and “Radical Islamic terrorism” in general.
Was that last statement itself the reason why Obama and Hillary are so profoundly against Trump, because he wants to DESTROY ISIS while Hillary and Obama helped to create and have armed the terrorists now slaughtering Christians around the world? Rather than risking nuclear annihilation and the possible deaths of millions of Americans and the end of America with a Hillary presidency that leads to nuclear war with Russia, shouldn't America be working with Russia to 'eradicate' those who want to kill us?
“We should work with any country that shares our goal of destroying ISIS and defeating Radical Islamic terrorism, and form new friendships and partnerships based on this mission,” Trump said. “We now have an Administration, and a former Secretary of State, who refuse to say Radical Islamic Terrorism.”
And he noted that he will not engage in an “apology tour” like President Barack Obama has—and Hillary Clinton would—but instead show the world how “proud” Americans are.
“Instead of an apology tour, I will proudly promote our system of government and our way of life as the best in the world – just like we did in our campaign against communism during the Cold War,” Trump said. “We will show the whole world how proud we are to be American.”