While anybody paying attention to the completely censored news of the government's geoengineering program over the past decade knows all about the strategic aerosol injections being sprayed into the skies, this new story over at USA Today acts as if we're all fools. As they report in the first paragraph of their story titled Creating clouds to stop global warming could wreak havoc, "to counteract global warming, humans may someday consider spraying sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere to form clouds - and artificially cool the Earth."
Not bothering to tell us that such geoengineering programs have already been going on for years, the USA Today story then drops this nuclear bombshell on our heads:
The idea behind the process, known as geoengineering, is to keep global warming under control — with the ideal solution still being a reduction in the emissions of greenhouse gases. (ANP: So, they finally admit it!)
However, suddenly stopping that spraying would have a "devastating" global impact on animals and plants, potentially even leading to extinction, according to the first study on the potential biological impacts of climate intervention.
"Rapid warming after stopping geoengineering would be a huge threat to the natural environment and biodiversity," said study co-author Alan Robock of Rutgers University. "If geoengineering ever stopped abruptly, it would be devastating, so you would have to be sure that it could be stopped gradually, and it is easy to think of scenarios that would prevent that."
Why is the mainstream media suddenly telling us about geoengineering when they've been censoring it forever even though it's been going on in the skies above our heads every day for a long, long time? And who hasn't seen the strategic aerosol injections that they've been spraying upon us start out as 'trails' before quickly dispersing into clouds as seen in video after video after video on YouTube as also seen in the photograph above? And finally, why the warning about suddenly stopping something that has been going on for many, many years when at the start of the story, they call geoengineering a hypothetical, "someday", situation?
As we hear in the first video below from Dane Wigington, "the mainstream media’s near total failure to tell the truth on any subject is a primary reason populations are still so completely disconnected from reality on countless issues with climate engineering at the top of the list."
With the ignorance of many Americans perfectly represented by a recent statement from California congress traitor Adam Schiff that "Americans are too stupid to understand" the viral FISA memo, our slam-dunk answer is that those Americans who've been getting their news from the mainstream media fall into that category but the rapidly awakening masses getting their news from alternative sources know all about 'strategic aerosol injections' and man's attempts to play God by manipulating the weather.
As Steve Quayle warned us long ago in his book "Weather Wars & Un-Natural Disasters", “Technology will make available, to the leaders of the major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of security forces need be appraised… Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”
And while USA Today calls this technology something that may be used in the future, Dane Wigington's website documents nearly 100 years worth of weather modification patents while back in July of 2017, we reported on ANP about the governor of the state of North Dakota, Doug Burgum, who himself admitted to the state using weather modification programs. From that story which used this Fox News story as our source.:
One of the most contested topics of the night was the cloud seeding program that has been going on in North Dakota for more than 50 years.
"Last night, the planes got out late, they didn't get to fly. Southern areas of Adams County all the way across the state picked up rain," said one of the attendees.
Governor Burgum says going over the data to see the effect of cloud seeding is an option.
"You know, is it effective or is it detrimental? And if it's having an effect, does it create winners and losers? And this is certainly something we got to go back and take a look at," said Gov. Burgum.
According to the Water Commission, cloud seeding has led to a 45 percent reduction in crop hail losses.
The latest U.S. Drought Monitor shows more than 35 percent of North Dakota in extreme drought.
Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI.
And while we won't fall for the USA Today 'end of the world' propaganda being brought upon by the stopping of these programs as it's been well documented that these programs are CAUSING havoc to our weather, not preventing it, as Wigington tells us, the still-dumbed down Obama-voting-masses are so disconnected from reality, they wouldn't know weather modification programs if they hit them in the face despite chemical death raining down upon us all from above almost every day.
With the USA Today story also hinting that these disastrous programs being suddenly stopped would bring about a possible extinction level event to the planet, this happening at a time when the ring of fire is awakening with volcanoes sending their naturally cooling ashes into the skies, we have numerous reasons to prepare as if the end of the world was suddenly upon us though the sudden stopping of these programs that have been long ongoing won't likely bring it. In the 2nd and final video below, videographer Linda Kirby talks with us about the recent story from USA Today.
