Match Exact Phrase    

Whatfinger: Frontpage For Conservative News Founded By Veterans

"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"

Share This


August 4, 2017

Is Civil War In America Ahead? Alleged Former 'Red Team Planner' For The Government Lays Out This Horrific, Worst-Case Scenario

By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die

According to this recent tweet put out by actor James Woods, a fervent President Donald Trump supporter, if the Democrats are successful in removing Trump via a 'deep state coup d'etat', there will be a civil war in America

With part of the 'deep state' having proven themselves to be nothing more than an extension of the 'Clinton Crime Family' (now 100% proven 'sore sport losers' of the 2016 election), the fact that Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev recently warned "there is no hope of improved relations" between the US and Russia because "the deep state aims to remove President Trump from power" shows we may be ticking down the moments towards outright chaos in America if James Woods is correct.

Back in June, prominent economist Martin Armstrong also predicted that if the left was successful in removing Trump, they will evoke such unrest in America that it will likely lead to another Civil War.

While former DNC head Debbie Wasserman Schultz recently claimed that all the fuss over Imran Awan and DNC crimes is 'just a distraction from Russia', anybody who's been paying attention to the events of the last year knows that 'Russia' is just a distraction from massive and unending DNC and Clinton crimes, and ANOTHER excuse for the losers to use for having lost the election. 

From the obvious DNC-linked murder of Seth Rich for 'leaking' DNC emails to Wikileaks to the massive cover-up of his murder taking place at what used to be the very highest level of politics and media here in America, we see more and more signs that our previous warnings of very real attempts being made to remove President Trump from office are materializing before our eyes.


In this story we'll take a look at the latest signs that the Clinton-tied 'deep state' will stop at nothing to get President Trump out of office as well as taking a long look at what a civil war might look like here in America according to an alleged 'red team government planner' who weighed in on this subject back when Barack Obama was still president.

We also look at several new videos below including the 2nd video below, a recent one from Mike Adams over at Natural News called "CIVIL WAR now HIGH RISK for America". In it, Mike warns us "There is now a very high risk of an outbreak of civil war in America if President Trump is impeached and indicted over fabricated accusations from the fascist, left-wing media."

Might America soon witness brother turning against brother and father turning against his children in what would most likely ensure a massive and violent 'deep state crackdown' all across America? The final video below looks at why the globalists are so intent upon taking down America, as to do so is the only way they can bring in their totalitarian-global-dictatorship.   


Might a bloody civil war in America be exactly what the globalists NEED to complete their job of bringing down America? The fact that President Trump's national security head HR McMaster is firing anybody who even suggests that a 'global conspiracy' is seeking to bring down America is another sign that some treasonous US Generals may have turned against President Trump and America as argued in the 1st and 3rd videos below from Infowars. 

With John McCain and most rinos having jumped on the 'Russians are Coming' crazy train right along with Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the looney left along with most of the msm, we see why recent warnings that President Trump may be in danger from 'enemies of America within' who seek to overthrow him may be correct and ask all to please pray for the safety and well-being of our America-1st leader


In the very interesting 'red game scenario' allegedly planned out by a 'red team planner' for the government a few years ago, we see that one of the first things he mentions is if any civil war did break out here in America, the entire world would get involved, and fast. Any opportunity that the globalists have to hasten the fall of our nation will surely be taken by them.

We have republished the entire scenario for you to ponder and debate below videos. Certainly we all know that nobody knows exactly how such a horrific thing as a civil war would play out in America and we'll do everything in our power to make sure no such war ever happens here. For if civil war were to break out in our nation, nearly all of America would eventually emerge as losers as 'totalitarians' take the opportunity to crack down upon everybody.

We thank 'Bud' from Survivalist Boards for publishing the version of the warning below. Also, please keep in mind, this was written before the election when it looked like Hillary was going to win. Also, when reading this, also please keep in mind that the person writing it takes issue with both 'red states' and 'blue states', calling out both 'Timmy Teabagger' and the 'aren't we so European' lefties.  

While ANP has been unable to confirm the warning seen below comes from an actual former 'red team planner' for the government, his statement has been picked up over and over again across the internet and many feel it is a very accurate portrayal of what might happen should civil war break out in this nation. It also gives us a great reason to go 'all in' to avoid such a war in America. 

Former red team planner for the government here.

If there was a revolution in the US, the rest of the world would get involved, fast. Depending on the type of uprising, there is a large chance that it would not be a quick affair. It would be brutal, it would be bloody, and the US government could start a global scale war. Here are the top ten issues that came up.

1) The US power grid can be taken down by a series of “surgical strikes” with the exception of the Texas grid. By surgical strikes, I mean a few marksmen (US army-tier Marksmen–the minimum requirement) hitting certain spots on the grid would **** a lot of the military and government because they need the grid more than 'Bubba and his friends' do. Additionally, while all government agencies have backup generators, they will be hard pressed dealing with the resultant looting and other madness that would come with power outages. This would effectively create another front for the military. It would also turn the people against the government more quickly and paralyze the government’s propaganda machine. Worse still–the key points of the US power grid are publicly obtainable information, and not only are the points too many to be effectively guarded, they are not guarded anyway.

2) The estimated desertion rate in case of a civil war is 75% in the case of a left-wing president. 50% of that would be assumed to immediately betray the president. The remaining (treasonous) military would be fighting its own. Yet another front created in the war. Additionally, there is an assumed 25-50% desertion or outright betrayal rate in three letter government agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA, ATC, TSA, etc.). Additionally, it is assumed that 5% of the initial 50% betrayers would stay in their job and become saboteurs. 10% of that 50% would contain key information that would be of critical danger to the US government. Of that 10%, 1% would be able to deliver that information to the US’ foreign enemies. What you should get from this is that the second the United States government declares war on its own is the second it ceases to exist as the state we know it.

3) “Tea baggers,” “right-wing extremists,” and “oath keepers” which are considered untrained racists who aren’t “good with a gun” often are A) veterans who now have more time to have fun at the range, sometimes more than some Army units or Marine units. In addition to previous military training, B) often camp and do other outdoor activities–more than many in the military do, as the focus has gone away from field exercises, and C) often have better equipment–outside of armor and heavy weapons–than the military. However, C) is kind of irrelevant because many of the places in which these people could hide would make the kind of war the US fights with the equipment they use pointless.

4) Outside influence is a huge problem. Russia has already stated they would back a Texas separatist movement, and right now we already have enough problem keeping Islam in check. The second the US has to fight in a “civil war” is the second it becomes a proxy war between NATO and whoever wants to mess with America. While America has amazing nuclear and air defense, if it comes to a civil war you have to assume that in a best cast scenario the US military is going to be operating at 50% capacity at best. **** would go down. Hard. And fast. And if Russia–spoiler alert: one of the best militaries in the world at fighting in an urban environment–sent trainers and helpers to rebels, you can reliably bet that they would also possibly deliver weapons to them. So instead of fighting “Timmy TeaBagger,” you are fighting “Timmy TeaBagger who is buddies with Vlad.”

5) A civil war is not just the US versus the rebels. There will be looting. There will be rioting. Cities will burn. The National Guard cannot fight both the rebels and rioters in a city that would also cut off their supplies. Additionally, if you don’t think that the rebels will send in instigators into the cities–or worse, stand alone actors (A Lone Wolf on steroids. Think Timothy McVeigh, but instead of one van they have a whole fleet of them. A good movie example would be Bane)–you would be mistaken. If the US government cannot even help its own people, why would its own people support the remaining (treasonous) military? Worse yet, if someone emptied out prisons (There are more prisoners in the US than there are people in the entire Chinese Army), you would have more crime than the police could ever handle.


6) Logistics and infrastructure in the US are crumbling and failing. Any war fought against a rebellion in the US would be a logistical nightmare, even before the rebels started going full Al-Qaida and putting IEDs in the road. A retired general who was contracting with us on the team said, “The only thing holding together the US’ infrastructure is duct tape and the will of the Department of Transportation. And often enough, there isn't enough duct tape.” Your most loyal cities to the US government, as we polled, are also the most logistically easy to cut off. NYC? San Fran? L.A.? D.C.? Baltimore? Most of them require crossing water to enter, from certain directions. Most of them have critical airports. Some of them have critical ocean ports. If anything happened to just TWO of the cities on the list, it would create a logistical cluster****.

7) Your “Johnny Reb” and “Timmy TeaBagger” states (i.e., “red” states) all have something most of your “oh so progressive,” “Aren’t we so European,” “Oh my god, we are just like Sweden,” blue states don’t. Blues are mainly consumer states. Reds are producer states. Urban areas don’t have farms. The second that **** goes down, realize a lot of those blue areas are likely to starve. In a civil war scenario, we predicted that at least 10,000 people would die of starvation if the war was not finished in a year. The numbers get worse after that. Or better, rather, for the country after the war.

8) The US has way too many choke points, and the government forces would often be on the wrong side of them. This ties into the logistical nightmare, but it also has to do with an odd phenomena. Liberals like to live near the ocean. Many of the dividers of the country, like the Rocky Mountains, the Mississippi River, Appalachia, the Missouri River (fun fact: the biggest choke point for the US government is in Missouri) are red state areas. Sure, air travel is a thing, but a majority of the US government's needs would have to travel by ground. Even still, many of the major airports are outside of the city. Of course, the US would use military base air fields, but if civil war did break out… which bases would be safe? Which ones would have fallen to the deserters?

9) PR Nightmare. Every rebel killed on CNN would be spun as “the US government killed X Civilians today in a strike” on foreign news and pirate media not owned by the government. That is–as pointed out earlier–if the US media could even function in a civil war or uprising. Your “rebel scum” know that the main thing that holds together the US–nay life in the US as we know it–is the 24 hour news cycle and the media. The second it's gone, you are going to have urban anarchy. If you are from America, can you imagine a day without TV, newspaper, or Internet? Your average urban youth can’t. If you don’t think that isn’t going to cause rioting, you must have a real high regard for how much restraint they have. Assume in a civil war that your ability to talk to the people is compromised. Also assume that in the case of a civil war that rebels may know how to monitor conversations like the US does, as there are manuals online on how to do so.

10) This one is either 1 or 10, depending on who is asked. The US will never nuke its own. The second it does, they have lost the civil war and other countries will come to “liberate” the US from its own “repressive regime.” Additionally, if any general, minuteman, nuke tech, or nuke sub captain decided to side with the rebellion, the US government is immediately SOL. In short: The second that a “civilian uprising” or “extremist group terrorist attack” turns into “civil war” is the second the US loses. As a result, you will never see a civil war. You will see Waco, you will see Bundy Ranch, you will see all sorts of militant group confrontations and maybe even some skirmishes. But the US government fears its own people way the **** too much to ever start a civil war.

As an American, I want all other Americans here to remember this. The government is against you, almost openly now, but they also know that they cannot win if it comes to open war. We have a trump card they cannot match. If it comes to a fight, THEY WILL LOSE, so there are elements in the establishment who will do absolutely everything in their power to prevent it from coming to that. The US Government is not in support of its people, and the people are not in support of the government.

It is within the means of certain interests to start World War III simply as a distraction to avoid an American Civil War, because, by their reckoning, it is better to ruin other “lesser” nations like Syria and spill the blood of patriots than lose their own grip on power.


WordPress Website design by Innovative Solutions Group - Helena, MT
comments powered by Disqus

Web Design by Innovative Solutions Group