"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
September 13, 2022
The World Economic Forum Is Heavily Pushing Microchips, Claiming Chip Implants Is Part Of 'Natural Evolution' - Don't Be Fooled By Their Rush Into An Orwellian Mad New World
Are we moving towards a brave new world? writes Karen Philips, Vice President R&D of the Interuniversity Microelectronics Center, in a recent World Economic Forum (WEF) article. As scary as chip implants may sound, they form part of a natural evolution that wearables once underwent.
Interesting.
Did Philips mention Aldous Huxleys Brave New World because she knows that the 1932 novel examines a society where citizens are sorted to be part of a certain social class, and the idea of individuality is non-existent?
Did Philips mention a brave new world because she recognizes that normalizing the implant of an electronic componenta chip into humans is the last nail in the coffin of personal autonomy and privacy in an increasingly surveillance-based America?
Selling the idea of chip implants for everyday people.
Objectively speaking, the essence of the article justifies using a technology called augmentation to improve the lives of ordinary people. The author claims that compelling arguments exist to interface our organic human self with chip implants.
For rationalization, Philips delivers a background of technology currently used for medical purposes. For example, electroceuticals produce electrical impulses to treat ailments and interfacing with the brain using neural probes to manage epilepsy.
Moreover, the author refers to the growth of wearable technology, such as augmented reality (AR) goggles, that superimposes layers of extra information in real-time over users real-world scenes to upgrade their life experience.
The article coxes the reader to entertain the idea of the natural evolution of augmented technology, which implies normalizing the fusion of our God-given organic biology with manufactured devices, to chiefly enhance our lives and safety.
(ANP EMERGENCY FUNDRAISER:Due to heavy censorship by 'big tech' upon ANP articles, we're running an emergency fundraising drive. We also want to thank everybody who has donated to ANP over the years. With donations and ad revenue all that keep ANP online, if you're able, please consider donating to ANP to help keep us in this fight for America's future at this absolutely critical time in US history. During a time of systematic, 'big tech' censorship and widespread institutional corruption, truth-seeking media and alternative views are crucial, and EVERY little bit helps more than you could know!)
Philips reasons that:
Augmentation can be defined as the extension of rehabilitation where technological aids such as glasses, cochlear implants or prosthetics are designed to restore a lost or impaired function.
And thats key: such implants serve niche medical purposes and arent normative in society. But thats exactly what the author has in mind:
Add it [augmentation] to completely healthy individuals and such technology can augment. Night goggles, exoskeletons and brain-computer interfaces build up the picture. The augmenting technology will help in all stages of life: children in a learning environment, professionals at work and ambitious senior citizens. There are many possibilities.
And heres what many possibilities might mean:
- connect our brain to the Internet and download new information in an increasingly fast-paced society where we dont have time to learn anymore
- enable facial recognition without physical ID cards or passports because we cant responsibly carry these around
- perform financial transactions without the hassle of getting out our card or smartphone, which could obviously get lost or stolen
- track our childrens whereabouts because we obviously cant teach them to be vigilant, and we cant trust them anymore because theyre bound to lose their smartphone.
For now, Americans generally appear hesitant about implants, in the brain at least. A Pew Research Center poll released in March showed that only 13 percent of surveyed 10,260 U.S. adults thought that chips implanted in the brain would be a good idea, despite the potential for faster and more accurate information processing.
But, pause for a moment if youre wondering whether implanting chips into healthy people is a thing from an alternative dystopian universe.
Chip implants have already taken place in Swedenand Wisconsin.
According to media pieces by the New York Post and NBC News, over 4,000 people in Sweden have had a microchip the size of a large grain of rice implanted in their hand.
Consequently, many Swedish people can use their hand to carry out everyday activities such as financial transactions. They can even scan their hand against their smartphone to access personal COVID-related data or monitor aspects of their health.
Make no mistake: here in the United States, microchipping has already taken place.
According to the DailyMail and CNBC News, around 80 of the 250 employees at software company Three Square Market in Wisconsin had a microchip inserted beneath the skin of their hand.
The microchip transmits data when scanned by an electronic reader, which can be used to access the Three Square Markets building. As such, the microchips are connected to employee accounts, so they can purchase food and drinks by swiping the reader against their hand, and funds are automatically deducted to cover the cost of the purchase.
It is really convenient having the chip in your hand with all the things it can do, Three Square Market CEO Todd Westby said in an interview.
When asked about who owns the microchip, Westby clarified the companys position:
It was never designed to be our property. We decided to put it in employees as a form of convenience for them. When employees leave, we actually consider it an employee retention tool. We do not plan on taking it out. You know, its up to the employees.
Well, for now. Essentially, its your choice if you want the convenience of not carrying a heavy stack of access cards and identification documents. Thats less responsibility and its just all so convenient.
Normalization starts with individual choice for adults restricted to a particular company or a niche group of microchip enthusiasts. But, before long, an implant becomes compulsory for all employees, and within years, the tech world of Silicon Valley will have embraced microchipping. Normalization needs to move fast before people have too much time to build opposition, and the next thing we know, schools are looking at microchipping our children for their safety.
Its all about the little ones.
Philips actually begins the first paragraph of the WEF article with: Superheroes have been dominating big and small screens for a while
Indeed, following the Great Depression in the 1930s, superhero characters with abilities beyond those of everyday people began to emerge in the form of Superman (1938) and Captain Marvel (1939), to name a few. This trend continued well into the 1960s with The Incredible Hulk, The X-Men and Iron Man, through the 1990s with Power Rangers and emerging female characters such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
Whether decades of superhero characters awash in childrens comic books and movies serve as predictive programming to normalize fusing their body with a chip, capable of reproducing a favorite superheros enhanced physical or cognitive skills, is a different subject matter altogether.
Nonetheless, the rest of Philips introductory statement is fantastic: but theres a subtle change happening. Many children expect to develop superpowers themselves.
Really? Since when?
My 7-year-old son might expect to develop flying powers or the ability to see in the dark, but he is pretending to have wings and he is pretending to possess night vision. Indeed, many children want to be superheroes, but they are pretending to possess superpowers of invisibility, 360-degree vision or teleportation.
The limits on implants are going to be set by ethical arguments rather than scientific capacity, writes Philips. For example, should you implant a tracking chip in your child? There are solid, rational reasons for it, like safety. Would you actually do it? Is it a bridge too far?
Ah, there goes that word. Safety. To protect ordinary people from a big, dangerous world where people are scamming one another, hijacking someone elses identity and kidnapping their children. And unless they have a chip implant that tracks their location, no child ever will be safe.
But no, its never a bridge too farfor as long as the public allows it.
Like Brave New World, George Orwells novel, 1984, warns about the dangers of totalitarianisma world governed by censorship and continual surveillance.
To quote Orwells final warning: dont let it happen. It depends on you.
ANP EMERGENCY FUNDRAISER: With non-stop censorship and 'big tech' attacks upon independent media, donations from readers are absolutely critical in keeping All News Pipeline online. So if you like stories like this, please consider donating to ANP.
All donations are greatly appreciated and will absolutely be used to keep us in this fight for the future of America.
Thank you and God Bless. Susan and Stefan. PLEASE HELP KEEP ANP ALIVE BY DONATING USING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS.
One time donations or monthly, via Paypal or Credit Card:
.jpg)
