"The Best Mix Of Hard-Hitting REAL News & Cutting-Edge Alternative News On The Web"
March 27, 2025
If The Original 13th Amendment, Titles Of Nobility, Were Restored The U.S. Government Would Have To Conduct Itself According To The Same Standards Of Decency, Respect, Law, As The Rest Of The Nation
Did you know that 30.5% of the House and 51% of the Senate hold law degrees and are registered with the BAR? The legal-field occupations held prior to being in Congress include State Attorney General (6: all in the Senate), Prosecutor (32: 6 in Senate, 26 in House), Judges (16: 15 in the House and 1 in the Senate), State or Territorial Legislators (264: 45 in Senate, 219 in House).And, there is the very strange circumstance of the Queen of England knighting Rudy Guilliano, the former mayor of New York City, for his actions during 9-11-2001, and his leadership in the aftermath of that disaster. Why the Queen of England would have anything to do with whats happening in New York City is a total puzzlement. Unless there is still a covert, secret arrangement between England and the United States - a tie that binds known only to high ranking officials of either side. Of course, if they're Americans who know this and conspire to keep the secret, then they may also be deemed traitors to their country.
Why would the United States require its lawyers to meet the criterion required by the British in order to practice law in the United States after the Revolutionary War? Thing is, they would not and did not.
While searching for evidence of government corruption in Maine in 1983, David Dodge, an archival researcher and Tom Dunn, police investigator discovered the original 13th Amendment which is known as the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TNA) or Titles of Nobility Emoluments Clause . For the remainder of this article, I will address this original 13th Amendment as TNA so as to not confuse it with the current 13th Amendment on slavery:
Section 1
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
After their original discovery, Dodge & Dunn spent the next 7 years on a hunt for the truth about it and its unlawful removal.Titles of Nobility were already (and still are) prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in the US Constitution Article 1 Sections 9 & 10 (1787).. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of theUnited States Constitutionattempted to prohibit the IBA/BAR from operating in the Colonies:
NoTitle of Nobilityshall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall,without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
Unfortunately, there were no penalties associated with this section so it was largely ignored.
In 1789 and again in 1810 the TNA was proposed in which citizenship would be stripped of anyone who held a title from any other country (not just Britain). In other words, it would give teeth to Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.It was concluded to have been ratified in 1819 and included in no less than 24 states copies of the Constitution of the United States between 1818 and 1876.
Twelve of 17 states officially sent paperwork ratifying the TNA prior to the breakout of the War of 1812:
Virginia, announced the ratification, being the 13th state to do so: by publication and dissemination of the Constitution which included the Titles of Nobility Amendment. But some argue that even though it was announced and disseminated, it was not legally ratified. Since the amendment was never lawfully nullified, it is still in full force and effect and is the Law of the land. If public support could be awakened, this missing Amendment might provide a legal basis to challenge many existing laws and court decisions previously made by lawyers who were unconstitutionally elected or appointed to their positions of power; it might even mean the removal of lawyers from our current government system.In 2008, a copy of the published VIRGINIA Constitution including the TNA was found in the TEXAS State Library and Archives Commission Sam Houston Regional Library and Research Center
How did TNA disappear? WAR (of course).
The War of 1812 began and the British specifically burned the Capitol, Library of Congress, and most of the first 38 years of records of the fledgling government. (Rhetorical question: What do governments do when they want to direct attention elsewhere while they destroy evidence of things they dont like? Rhetorical answer: Start Wars!)
With the dearth of documents from the first 38 yearsDodge & Dunndiscovered ancillary documentation through the 24 states/territories that published the TNA in their official publications as a ratified amendment to the Constitution of the United States after 1812. They discovered a total of 78 official government publications published between 1818 and 1876 that contained the TNA:
This research shows us that the TNA was in force until shortly after the Civil War (1861-1865). It was during this period that it mysteriously disappeared and was replaced with the current slavery amendment.By August 1, 1981, Dodge & Dunn compiled the findings of the 7 year search claiming that the TNA is still the law today because it was never lawfully repealed.
Why is this TNA so important?
In Colonial America there were no trained attorneys. Basically anyone could be counsel, district attorney, attorney general, or judge.
TheKing of England charteredthe BAR in the mid-1600s. Becoming a member of the BAR granted the British title ofEsquire. Having the title of Esquire meant you were an agent of Britain with purposes of political aspirations (like todays political activist judges?)
Unlike today, where the British Royal Family is watched on TV and followed on Social Media, after the Revolutionary War the Founders wanted to make sure that the British could not worm their way into OUR government covertly subverting, bribing, and deceiving (which, it appears, they are actually doing these days with what DOGE is revealing). After the wars, the most common title of nobility was Esquire which is still in use today.
WHY deny those who join the BAR/IBA be denied opportunity to hold public office?
It is because lawyers and attorneys formally registeredwiththe BAR that theycould not be trustedto hold public office in the USA. By implicitly pledging their allegiance to an entity of a foreign government, theycould not be trustedto act in the best interest of the American Republic or its citizens.
The Court, in Horst v. Moses, 48 Alabama 129, 142 (1872) gave the following description of a title of nobility:
To confer a title of nobility, is to nominate to an order of persons to whom privileges are granted at the expense of the rest of the people. It is not necessarily hereditary, and the objection to it rises more from the privileges supposed to be attached than to the otherwise empty title or order.These components are forbidden separately in the terms privilege, honor, and emoluments, as they are collectively in the term title of nobility.The prohibition is not affected by any consideration paid or rendered for the grant.
Bouviers Law Dictionary, 15th Edition, vol. 1 (1885) lists the due process amendments as 5 and 15 [15 was re-numbered to 14] on p.571.
The prohibition of titles of nobility stops the claim of eminent domain through fictions of law. Eminent domain is the legal euphemism for expropriation, and unreasonable seizure given sanction by the targets of this amendment.
Removal
How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution of the United States simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance or at least some curiosity from the American people? And an Amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office -- thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the Bar association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe? So that WE might not be conquered from within as opposed to without?
Significance of Removal
To create the present oligarchy (rule by lawyers) which we now endure, the lawyers first had to remove the 13th "titles of nobility" Amendment that might otherwise have kept them in check. In fact, it was not until after the Civil War and after the disappearance of this 13th Amendment, that American bar associations began to appear and exercise political power. Since the unlawful deletion of the 13th Amendment, the newly developing bar associations began working diligently to create a system wherein lawyers took on a title of privilege and nobility as "Esquires" and received the "honor" of offices and positions (like district attorney or judge) that only lawyers may now hold. By virtue of these titles, honors, and special privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority of U.S. citizens. Through these privileges, they have nearly established a two-tiered citizenship in this nation where a majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run for political office. This two-tiered citizenship is clearly contrary to Americans' political interests, the nation's economic welfare, and the Constitution's egalitarian spirit. The significance of this missing 13th Amendment and its deletion from the Constitution is this: Since the amendment was never lawfully nullified, it is still in full force and effect and is the Law of the land. If public support could be awakened, this missing Amendment might provide a legal basis to challenge many existing laws and court decisions previously made by lawyers who were unconstitutionally elected or appointed to their positions of power; it might even mean the removal of lawyers from our current government system. At the very least, this missing 13th Amendment demonstrates that two centuries ago, lawyers were recognized as enemies of the people and nation. Some things never change.
This current aristocracy operates covertly and by deceit. The bankers are the main (but not the only) element in this covert aristocracy. Using many of the standard principles of aristocracy (authoritarianism, statism, and the use of an intellectual priesthood to deceive the public) they have created a social system where robbery and exploitation are systematized and legalized and where resistance to the robber has been made a crime. "It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."--U.S. Supreme Court
Since the unlawful deletion of the TNA, the newly developing bar associations began working diligently to create a system wherein lawyers took on a title of privilege and nobility as ―Esquires and received the ―honor of offices and positions (like district attorney or judge) that only lawyers may now hold. By virtue of these titles, honors, and special privileges, lawyers have assumed political and economic advantages over the majority of U.S. citizens. Through these privileges, they have nearly established a two-tiered citizenship in this nation where a majority may vote, but only a minority (lawyers) may run for political office. This two-tiered citizenship is clearly contrary to Americans political interests, the nations economic welfare, and the Constitutions egalitarian spirit.
What could happen if the TNA were restored?
New Hampshire attempted, in House Bill 638 March 20, 2013 to recognize the TNA as a ratified amendment. The bill explains how "The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, otherwise known as the Act of 1871, created a corporation in the District of Columbia called the United States of America. The act revoked prior legislation relative to the districts municipal charter and, most egregiously, led to adoption of a fraudulent constitution in which the original Thirteenth Amendment was omitted." The bill was pronounced dead the same day. Makes one wonder how many of those legislators were BAR/IBA members.
If the missing 13th Amendment were restored, special interests and immunity might be rendered unconstitutional. The prohibition against honors (privileges) would compel the entire government to operate under the same laws as the citizens of this nation.Without their current personal immunities (honors), US judges and I.R.S. agents would be unable to abuse common citizens without fear of legal liability.
If TNA were restored, the entire U.S. Government would have to conduct itself according to the same standards of decency, respect, law, and liability as the rest of the nation. If this Amendment and the termhonor were applied today, U.S. Governments ability to systematically coerce and abuse the public would be all but eliminated.
Imagine a nation which prohibited at least some lawyers from serving in government. Imagine a government prohibited from writing laws granting "honors" (special privileges, immunities, or ad- vantages) to individuals, groups, or government officials. Imagine a government that could only write laws that applied to everyone, even themselves, equally.
At the first reading, the meaning of this 13th Amendment (also called the title of nobility Amendment) seems obscure, unimportant. The references to nobility, honour, emperor, king, and prince lead us to dismiss this amendment as a petty postrevolution act of spite directed against the British monarchy. But in our modern world of Lady Di and Prince Charles, anti-royalist sentiments seem so archaic and quaint, that the Amendment can be ignored. Not so. Consider some evidence of its historical significance: First, titles of nobility were prohibited in both Article VI of the Articles of Confederation (1777) and in Article I, Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution of the United States (1787); Second, although already prohibited by the Constitution, an additional title of nobility amendment was proposed in 1789, again in 1810, and according to Dodge, finally ratified in 1819.
Our Constitutional Republic was set up with 3-co-equal branches of Government: Executive, Judicial, & Congressional. The lawyers belong in the Judicial branch NOT the Congressional or Executive Branches! BAR Lawyers MUST be removed from Congress.
Difference between current/past office holders of both DNC & GOP
Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school. Other notable democratic public office holders were also lawyers: Barack, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, John Edwards, Elizabeth Edwards, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, and Ex-Senator Harry Reid. It appears the DNC is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, who heal the sick like, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich. Apparently the DNC sees people who provide goods and services as enemies.
The Republican Party is different. President Trump, President Bush 1 and 2, and Vice President Cheney, businessman. President Eisenhower a 5 star General. Newt Gingricha history professor. Tom Delay an exterminator. Dick Armey an economist. Ex-House Minority Leader Boehner a plastic manufacturer. Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist a heart surgeon. Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.
Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. . . . The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers! . . . When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.
With the recent rumors of the Trump Administration, and even President Trump himself,appearing to seriously consider the United States becoming a member state of the United Kingdom as well as the number of activist judges appearing to usurp the role of the Presidency (including a couple judges currently in SCOTUS), it might behoove us to pursue the idea of making ratification of the Original 13th Amendment of the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights aka Titles of Nobility Amendment a reality.
Something to ponder
Would the concept of honor apply to holders of non-US Citizenship or dual citizenship?
VIDEO Interview with David Dodge Nov 2012
ANP EMERGENCY Fundraiser: Dangerous, Derogatory, Harmful, Unreliable!Those are some of the exact words used by Googles censors, aka 'Orwelliancontent police,' in describing many of our controversial stories.Stories later proven to be truthful and light years ahead of the mainstream media. But because we reported those 'inconvenient truths' they're trying to bankrupt ANP.
